• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

RFC (make up a number not in use) - Blueprint for setting up snort + pfblocker

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfSense Packages
171 Posts 26 Posters 186.6k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ?
    A Former User
    last edited by Aug 17, 2013, 4:24 PM Aug 17, 2013, 4:13 PM

    Certainly enable ALL the default disabled ones. An example is the nmap rules. They are disabled but if enabled you'll see a lot of the nmap scans (I'll take a wild guess and say ALL) caught by snort.

    EDIT: Special thanks to awsiemieniec for pointing out that some items I have listed are no longer valid. I have looked into this and some rules have been moved to more appropriate categories. For example skype rules used to be under policy and are now under chat. I'll have to update my list and upload a new copy of it. Thanks to all for your understanding and cooperation. Guess summer holidays are not holidays anymore.  ;D
    EDIT-EDIT: Forgot to mention that on my systems they are still disabled even if moved to a different category, since the enabling/disabling is based on the rule id which is still the same.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • ?
      A Former User
      last edited by Aug 17, 2013, 9:47 PM Aug 17, 2013, 6:02 PM

      EXTRA EXTRA!!!! Updated list!!! Read all about it!!! First on the pfsense forums!!! EXTRA EXTRA!!!

      In tab "Rules", under "Category" select:
      (–- means blank table at time of writing)

      emerging-activex > all

      emerging-attack_responses > all

      DO NOT USE! > emerging-botcc > use pfblocker with: http://rules.emergingthreats.net/fwrules/emerging-Block-IPs.txt

      emerging-chat > all except:
      2010784 ET CHAT Facebook Chat (send message)
      2010785 ET CHAT Facebook Chat (buddy list)
      2010786 ET CHAT Facebook Chat (settings)
      2010819 ET CHAT Facebook Chat using XMPP
      2002327 ET CHAT Google Talk (Jabber) Client Login
      2002334 ET CHAT Google IM traffic Jabber client sign-on
      2001241 ET CHAT MSN file transfer request
      2001242 ET CHAT MSN file transfer accept
      2001243 ET CHAT MSN file transfer reject
      2001682 ET CHAT MSN IM Poll via HTTP
      2002192 ET CHAT MSN status change
      2008289 ET CHAT Possible MSN Messenger File Transfer
      2009375 ET CHAT General MSN Chat Activity
      2009376 ET CHAT MSN User-Agent Activity
      2001595 ET CHAT Skype VOIP Checking Version (Startup)
      2002157 ET CHAT Skype User-Agent detected
      2003022 ET CHAT Skype Bootstrap Node (udp)

      DO NOT USE! > emerging-ciarmy > use pfblocker with:
      http://www.ciarmy.com/list/ci-badguys.txt

      DO NOT USE! > emerging-compromised > use pfblocker with: http://rules.emergingthreats.net/blockrules/compromised-ips.txt

      emerging-current_events > all

      emerging-deleted > ---

      emerging-dns > all except:
      2008446 ET DNS Excessive DNS Responses with 1 or more RR's (100+ in 10
      seconds) - possible Cache Poisoning Attempt
      2008470 ET DNS Excessive NXDOMAIN responses - Possible DNS Backscatter or Domain Generation Algorithm Lookups
      2001117 ET DNS Standard query response, Name Error

      emerging-dos > all

      DO NOT USE! > emerging-drop > use pfblocker with: http://list.iblocklist.com/?list=sh_drop&fileformat=p2p

      DO NOT USE! > emerging-dshield > use pfblocker with: (cannot find specific list, but ip listed in pfblocker tables, NEED HELP HERE<<<<) Could be due to ET list used by pfblocker. http://rules.emergingthreats.net/blockrules/compromised-ips.txt <<< includes IP related to different subjects, so its a misc list, likely including the hosts I could not find on specific lists.

      emerging-exploit > all except:
      2001058 ET EXPLOIT libpng tRNS overflow attempt
      2002913 ET EXPLOIT VNC Client response
      2002914 ET EXPLOIT VNC Server VNC Auth Offer
      2002919 ET EXPLOIT VNC Good Authentication Reply
      2002915 ET EXPLOIT VNC Authentication Reply
      2002758 ET EXPLOIT WMF Escape Record Exploit - Version 1
      2002742 ET EXPLOIT WMF Escape Record Exploit - Version 3

      emerging-ftp > all

      emerging-games > all

      emerging-icmp > ---

      emerging-icmp_info > ---

      emerging-imap > ---

      emerging-inappropriate > all except:
      2002925 ET INAPPROPRIATE Google Image Search, Safe Mode Off
      2001608 ET INAPPROPRIATE Likely Porn

      emerging-info > all except:
      2014472 ET INFO JAVA - Java Archive Download
      2014473 ET INFO JAVA - Java Archive Download By Vulnerable Client
      2014819 ET INFO Packed Executable Download
      2015016 ET INFO FTP STOR to External Network
      2015561 ET INFO PDF Using CCITTFax Filter
      2015744 ET INFO EXE IsDebuggerPresent (Used in Malware Anti-Debugging)
      2016360 ET INFO JAVA - ClassID
      2016361 ET INFO JAVA - ClassID
      2016404 ET INFO MPEG Download Over HTTP (1)

      emerging-malware > all except:
      2008438 ET MALWARE Possible Windows executable sent when remote host claims to send a Text File
      2012228 ET MALWARE Suspicious Russian Content-Language Ru Which May Be Malware Related
      2012229 ET MALWARE Suspicious Chinese Content-Language zh-cn Which May be Malware Related

      emerging-misc > all

      emerging-mobile_malware > all except:
      2012251 ET MOBILE_MALWARE Google Android Device HTTP Request
      2012848 ET MOBILE_MALWARE Possible Mobile Malware POST of IMEI International Mobile Equipment Identity in URI

      emerging-netbios > all

      emerging-p2p > all except:
      2000369 ET P2P BitTorrent Announce
      2007727 ET P2P possible torrent download
      2008581 ET P2P BitTorrent DHT ping request
      2008583 ET P2P BitTorrent DHT nodes reply
      2008585 ET P2P BitTorrent DHT announce_peers request
      2010144 ET P2P Vuze BT UDP Connection (5)
      2011699 ET P2P Bittorrent P2P Client User-Agent (Transmission/1.x)
      2016662 ET P2P Possible Bittorrent Activity - Multiple DNS Queries For tracker hosts
      2014734 ET P2P BitTorrent - Torrent File Downloaded

      emerging-policy > all except:
      2000419 ET POLICY PE EXE or DLL Windows file download
      2000428 ET POLICY ZIP file download
      2001115 ET POLICY MSI (microsoft installer file) download
      2003595 ET POLICY exe download via HTTP - Informational
      2001898 ET POLICY eBay Bid Placed
      2001907 ET POLICY eBay Placing Item for sale
      2001908 ET POLICY eBay View Item
      2001909 ET POLICY eBay Watch This Item
      2003303 ET POLICY FTP Login Attempt (non-anonymous)
      2003410 ET POLICY FTP Login Successful
      2003121 ET POLICY docs.google.com Activity
      2003597 ET POLICY Google Calendar in Use
      2002801 ET POLICY Google Desktop User-Agent Detected
      2002838 ET POLICY Google Search Appliance browsing the Internet
      2000035 ET POLICY Hotmail Inbox Access
      2000036 ET POLICY Hotmail Message Access
      2000037 ET POLICY Hotmail Compose Message Access
      2000038 ET POLICY Hotmail Compose Message Submit
      2000039 ET POLICY Hotmail Compose Message Submit Data
      2008238 ET POLICY Hotmail Inbox Access
      2008239 ET POLICY Hotmail Message Access
      2008240 ET POLICY Hotmail Compose Message Access
      2008242 ET POLICY Hotmail Access Full Mode
      2006408 ET POLICY HTTP Request on Unusual Port Possibly Hostile
      2006409 ET POLICY HTTP POST on unusual Port Possibly Hostile
      2002330 ET POLICY Google Talk TLS Client Traffic
      2002332 ET POLICY Google IM traffic Windows client user sign-on
      2002333 ET POLICY Google IM traffic friend invited
      2002878 ET POLICY iTunes User Agent
      2002722 ET POLICY MP3 File Transfer Outbound
      2002723 ET POLICY MP3 File Transfer Inbound
      2001114 ET POLICY Mozilla XPI install files download
      2001973 ET POLICY SSH Server Banner Detected on Expected Port
      2001974 ET POLICY SSH Client Banner Detected on Expected Port
      2001975 ET POLICY SSHv2 Server KEX Detected on Expected Port
      2001976 ET POLICY SSHv2 Client KEX Detected on Expected Port
      2001977 ET POLICY SSHv2 Client New Keys detected on Expected Port
      2001978 ET POLICY SSH session in progress on Expected Port
      2001979 ET POLICY SSH Server Banner Detected on Unusual Port
      2001980 ET POLICY SSH Client Banner Detected on Unusual Port
      2001981 ET POLICY SSHv2 Server KEX Detected on Unusual Port
      2001982 ET POLICY SSHv2 Client KEX Detected on Unusual Port
      2001983 ET POLICY SSHv2 Client New Keys Detected on Unusual Port
      2001984 ET POLICY SSH session in progress on Unusual Port
      2009001 ET POLICY Login Credentials Possibly Passed in URI
      2009004 ET POLICY Login Credentials Possibly Passed in POST Data
      2003214 ET POLICY Pingdom.com Monitoring detected
      2003215 ET POLICY Pingdom.com Monitoring Node Active
      2001669 ET POLICY Proxy GET Request
      2001670 ET POLICY Proxy HEAD Request
      2001674 ET POLICY Proxy POST Request
      2001675 ET POLICY Proxy CONNECT Request
      2002922 ET POLICY VNC Authentication Successful
      2002920 ET POLICY VNC Authentication Failure
      2003026 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 443 being excluded from SSL Alerts
      2004598 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 9001 (aol) being excluded from SSL Alerts
      2003027 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 8000 being excluded from SSL Alerts
      2003028 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 8080 being excluded from SSL Alerts
      2003029 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 8200 being excluded from SSL Alerts
      2003030 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 8443 being excluded from SSL Alerts
      2003033 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 2967 (Symantec) being excluded from SSL Alerts
      2003035 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 3128 (proxy) being excluded from SSL Alerts
      2003036 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 8080 (proxy) being excluded from SSL Alerts
      2003037 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 8292 (Bloomberg) being excluded from SSL Alerts
      2003038 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 8294 (Bloomberg) being excluded from SSL Alerts
      2003934 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 1521 (Oracle) being excluded from SSL Alerts
      2008543 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 995 (imaps) being excluded from SSL Alerts
      2003002 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Client Hello on Unusual Port TLS
      2003003 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Client Hello on Unusual Port SSLv3
      2003004 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Client Hello on Unusual Port Case 2
      2003005 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Client Hello on Unusual Port SSLv3
      2003006 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Client Key Exchange on Unusual Port
      2003007 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Client Key Exchange on Unusual Port SSLv3
      2003008 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Client Cipher Set on Unusual Port
      2003009 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Client Cipher Set on Unusual Port SSLv3
      2003010 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Server Hello on Unusual Port
      2003011 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Server Hello on Unusual Port SSLv3
      2003012 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Server Certificate Exchange on Unusual Port
      2003013 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Server Certificate Exchange on Unusual Port SSLv3
      2003014 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Server Key Exchange on Unusual Port
      2003015 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Server Key Exchange on Unusual Port SSLv3
      2003018 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Server Cipher Set on Unusual Port
      2003019 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Server Cipher Set on Unusual Port SSLv3
      2003020 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Encrypted Application Data on Unusual Port
      2003021 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Encrypted Application Data on Unusual Port SSLv3
      2007671 ET POLICY Binary Download Smaller than 1 MB Likely Hostile
      2001449 ET POLICY Proxy Connection detected
      2002822 ET POLICY Wget User Agent
      2002823 ET POLICY POSSIBLE Web Crawl using Wget
      2002824 ET POLICY CURL User Agent
      2002934 ET POLICY libwww-perl User Agent
      2002828 ET POLICY Googlebot User Agent
      2002829 ET POLICY Googlebot Crawl
      2002830 ET POLICY Msnbot User Agent
      2002831 ET POLICY Msnbot Crawl
      2002832 ET POLICY Yahoo Crawler User Agent
      2002833 ET POLICY Yahoo Crawler Crawl
      2010228 ET POLICY Suspicious Microsoft Windows NT 6.1 User-Agent Detected
      2002948 ET POLICY External Windows Update in Progress
      2002949 ET POLICY Windows Update in Progress
      2001402 ET POLICY ZIPPED DOC in transit
      2001403 ET POLICY ZIPPED XLS in transit
      2001404 ET POLICY ZIPPED EXE in transit
      2001405 ET POLICY ZIPPED PPT in transit
      2011874 ET POLICY NSPlayer User-Agent Windows Media Player streaming detected
      2012647 ET POLICY Dropbox.com Offsite File Backup in Use
      2012648 ET POLICY Dropbox Client Broadcasting
      2013028 ET POLICY curl User-Agent Outbound
      2013030 ET POLICY libwww-perl User-Agent
      2013031 ET POLICY Python-urllib/ Suspicious User Agent
      2013290 ET POLICY MOBILE Apple device leaking UDID from SpringBoard via GET
      2013414 ET POLICY Executable served from Amazon S3
      2013458 ET POLICY Facebook Like Button Clicked (1)
      2013459 ET POLICY Facebook Like Button Clicked (2)
      2013503 ET POLICY OS X Software Update Request Outbound
      2013504 ET POLICY GNU/Linux APT User-Agent Outbound likely related to package management
      2013505 ET POLICY GNU/Linux YUM User-Agent Outbound likely related to package management
      2014297 ET POLICY Vulnerable Java Version 1.7.x Detected
      2014313 ET POLICY Executable Download From DropBox
      2014919 ET POLICY Microsoft Online Storage Client Hello TLSv1 Possible SkyDrive (1)
      2014920 ET POLICY Microsoft Online Storage Client Hello TLSv1 Possible SkyDrive (2)
      2017015 ET POLICY DropBox User Content Access over SSL
      2001375 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (16 digit spaced)
      2001376 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (16 digit dashed)
      2001377 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (16 digit)
      2001378 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (15 digit)
      2001379 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (15 digit spaced)
      2001380 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (15 digit dashed)
      2001381 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (14 digit)
      2001382 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (14 digit spaced)
      2001383 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (14 digit dashed)
      2009293 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (15 digit spaced 2)
      2009294 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (15 digit dashed 2)
      2001328 ET POLICY SSN Detected in Clear Text (dashed)
      2001384 ET POLICY SSN Detected in Clear Text (spaced)
      2007971 ET POLICY SSN Detected in Clear Text (SSN )
      2007972 ET POLICY SSN Detected in Clear Text (SSN# )
      2011854 ET POLICY Java JAR file download
      2002749 ET POLICY Unallocated IP Space Traffic - Bogon Nets   <<<<<<<< handled by ticking block bogon networks in interface settings
      2002752 ET POLICY Reserved Internal IP Traffic    <<<<<<<<<<<<< handled by ticking block private networks in interface settings

      emerging-pop3 > ---

      DO NOT USE! > emerging-rbn-malvertisers > use pfblocker with: http://doc.emergingthreats.net/pub/Main/RussianBusinessNetwork/emerging-rbn-malvertisers.txt

      DO NOT USE! > emerging-rbn > use pfblocker with: http://doc.emergingthreats.net/pub/Main/RussianBusinessNetwork/RussianBusinessNetworkIPs.txt

      emerging-rpc > ---

      emerging-scada > all

      emerging-scan > all except
      2002992 ET SCAN Rapid POP3 Connections - Possible Brute Force Attack
      2002993 ET SCAN Rapid POP3S Connections - Possible Brute Force Attack
      2002994 ET SCAN Rapid IMAP Connections - Possible Brute Force Attack
      2002995 ET SCAN Rapid IMAPS Connections - Possible Brute Force Attack

      emerging-shellcode > all except
      2011803 ET SHELLCODE Possible TCP x86 JMP to CALL Shellcode Detected
      2012252 ET SHELLCODE Common 0a0a0a0a Heap Spray String
      2012257 ET SHELLCODE Common %0c%0c%0c%0c Heap Spray String
      2012510 ET SHELLCODE UTF-8/16 Encoded Shellcode
      2013222 ET SHELLCODE Excessive Use of HeapLib Objects Likely Malicious Heap Spray Attempt
      2013267 ET SHELLCODE Hex Obfuscated JavaScript Heap Spray 0a0a0a0a

      emerging-smtp > all

      emerging-snmp > all

      emerging-sql > all

      emerging-telnet > all

      emerging-tftp > all

      DO NOT USE! > emerging-tor > use pfblocker with http://list.iblocklist.com/?list=tor&fileformat=p2p

      emerging-trojan > all except
      2009205 ET TROJAN Possible Downadup/Conficker-C P2P encrypted traffic UDP Ping Packet (bit value 1)
      2009206 ET TROJAN Possible Downadup/Conficker-C P2P encrypted traffic UDP Ping Packet (bit value 4)
      2009207 ET TROJAN Possible Downadup/Conficker-C P2P encrypted traffic UDP Ping Packet (bit value 5)
      2009208 ET TROJAN Possible Downadup/Conficker-C P2P encrypted traffic UDP Ping Packet (bit value 16)
      2001046 ET TROJAN UPX compressed file download possible malware

      emerging-user_agents > all except:
      2010697 ET USER_AGENTS Suspicious User-Agent Beginning with digits - Likely spyware/trojan

      emerging-voip > all

      emerging-web_client > all except
      2011347 ET WEB_CLIENT Possible String.FromCharCode Javascript Obfuscation Attempt
      2011507 ET WEB_CLIENT PDF With Embedded File
      2010518 ET WEB_CLIENT Possible HTTP 404 XSS Attempt (External Source)
      2012056 ET WEB_CLIENT Flash Player Flash6.ocx AllowScriptAccess Denial of Service
      2012075 ET WEB_CLIENT Possible Internet Explorer CSS Parser Remote Code Execution Attempt
      2012119 ET WEB_CLIENT Possible Hex Obfuscation Usage On Webpage
      2012205 ET WEB_CLIENT Possible Malicious String.fromCharCode with charCodeAt String
      2012266 ET WEB_CLIENT Hex Obfuscation of unescape % Encoding
      2012272 ET WEB_CLIENT Hex Obfuscation of eval % Encoding
      2012398 ET WEB_CLIENT Hex Obfuscation of replace Javascript Function % Encoding
      2010527 ET WEB_CLIENT Possible HTTP 503 XSS Attempt (External Source)
      2010931 ET WEB_CLIENT Possible IE iepeers.dll Use-after-free Code Execution Attempt

      emerging-web_server > all except
      2003099 ET WEB_SERVER Poison Null Byte
      2015526 ET WEB_SERVER Fake Googlebot UA 1 Inbound

      emerging-web_specific_apps > all except:
      2010890 ET WEB_SPECIFIC_APPS phpBB3 registration (Step1 GET)
      2010891 ET WEB_SPECIFIC_APPS phpBB3 registration (Step2 POST)
      2010892 ET WEB_SPECIFIC_APPS phpBB3 registration (Step3 GET)
      2010893 ET WEB_SPECIFIC_APPS phpBB3 registration (Step4 POST)

      emerging-worm > all

      GPLv2 community rules > all except
      254 DNS SPOOF query response with TTL of 1 min. and no authority
      384 PROTOCOL-ICMP PING
      385 PROTOCOL-ICMP traceroute
      399 PROTOCOL-ICMP Destination Unreachable Host Unreachable
      402 PROTOCOL-ICMP Destination Unreachable Port Unreachable
      408 PROTOCOL-ICMP Echo Reply
      540 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN message
      648 INDICATOR-SHELLCODE x86 NOOP
      649 INDICATOR-SHELLCODE x86 setgid 0
      1200 INDICATOR-COMPROMISE Invalid URL
      1201 INDICATOR-COMPROMISE 403 Forbidden
      1292 INDICATOR-COMPROMISE directory listing
      1390 INDICATOR-SHELLCODE x86 inc ebx NOOP
      1394 INDICATOR-SHELLCODE x86 inc ecx NOOP
      1437 FILE-IDENTIFY Microsoft Windows Media download detected
      1841 FILE-OTHER Oracle Javascript URL host spoofing attempt
      1846 POLICY-MULTIMEDIA vncviewer Java applet download attempt
      1852 SERVER-WEBAPP robots.txt access
      1986 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN outbound file transfer request
      1988 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN outbound file transfer accept
      1989 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN outbound file transfer rejected
      1990 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN user search
      1991 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN login attempt
      2180 PUA-P2P BitTorrent announce request
      2181 PUA-P2P BitTorrent transfer
      2707 FILE-IMAGE JPEG parser multipacket heap overflow
      3463 SERVER-WEBAPP awstats access
      25518 OS-OTHER Apple iPod User-Agent detected
      25519 OS-OTHER Apple iPad User-Agent detected
      25520 OS-OTHER Apple iPhone User-Agent detected
      25521 OS-OTHER Android User-Agent detected
      25522 OS-OTHER Nokia User-Agent detected
      25523 OS-OTHER Samsung User-Agent detected
      25524 OS-OTHER Kindle User-Agent detected
      25525 OS-OTHER Nintendo User-Agent detected

      IPS Policy - Security > all except
      26354 BROWSER-IE Microsoft Internet Explorer expression clause in style tag cross site scripting attempt
      19436 BROWSER-IE Microsoft Internet Explorer CStyleSheetRule array memory corruption attempt
      18196 BROWSER-IE Microsoft Internet Explorer CSS importer use-after-free attempt
      16482 BROWSER-IE Microsoft Internet Explorer userdata behavior memory corruption attempt
      15147 BROWSER-IE Microsoft Internet Explorer malformed iframe buffer overflow attempt
      13964 BROWSER-IE Microsoft Internet Explorer span frontier parsing memory corruption
      11257 BROWSER-IE Microsoft Internet Explorer colgroup tag uninitialized memory exploit attempt
      8375 BROWSER-PLUGINS QuickTime Object ActiveX clsid access
      24891 FILE-FLASH Action InitArray stack overflow attempt
      24889 FILE-FLASH Action InitArray stack overflow attempt
      12183 FILE-FLASH Adobe FLV long string script data buffer overflow
      24714 FILE-IMAGE Oracle Outside In JPEG COC parameter buffer overflow attempt
      24713 FILE-IMAGE Oracle Outside In JPEG COD parameter buffer overflow attempt
      2707 FILE-IMAGE JPEG parser multipacket heap overflow
      23170 FILE-MULTIMEDIA Apple QuickTime MPEG stream padding buffer overflow attempt
      13919 FILE-MULTIMEDIA Apple QuickTime MOV file string handling integer overflow attempt
      21927 FILE-OFFICE Microsoft Office Excel style handling overflow attempt
      15866 FILE-OTHER libxml2 file processing long entity overflow attempt
      23101 FILE-OTHER Cisco WebEx recording integer overflow attempt
      23100 FILE-OTHER Cisco WebEx recording integer overflow attempt
      24229 FILE-OTHER RealNetworks Netzip Classic zip archive long filename buffer overflow attempt
      6504 FILE-OTHER Sophos Anti-Virus CAB file overflow attempt
      16295 FILE-OTHER Kaspersky antivirus library heap buffer overflow - without optional fields
      25459 FILE-PDF Adobe Reader incomplete JP2K image geometry - potentially malicious
      15362 INDICATOR-OBFUSCATION obfuscated javascript excessive fromCharCode - potential attack
      26616 INDICATOR-OBFUSCATION Javascript indexOf rename attempt
      13864 POLICY-OTHER Microsoft Watson error reporting attempt
      540 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN message
      1986 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN outbound file transfer request
      1988 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN outbound file transfer accept
      1989 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN outbound file transfer rejected
      1990 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN user search
      1991 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN login attempt
      5694 PUA-P2P Skype client setup get newest version attempt
      5693 PUA-P2P Skype client start up get latest version attempt
      5999 PUA-P2P Skype client login
      5998 PUA-P2P Skype client login startup
      16281 PUA-P2P BitTorrent scrape request
      5692 PUA-P2P Skype client successful install
      16320 WEB-CLIENT Adobe PNG empty sPLT exploit attempt
      15975 WEB-CLIENT OpenOffice TIFF file in little endian format parsing integer overflow attempt
      15976 WEB-CLIENT OpenOffice TIFF file in big endian format parsing integer overflow attempt
      15317 BROWSER-PLUGINS Akamai DownloadManager ActiveX function call access
      26926 FILE-OTHER Multiple products ZIP archive virus detection bypass attempt

      Suppression list:

      #GLOBAL

      gen_id 1

      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 536
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 648
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 653
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 1390
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2452
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 11192
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 15306
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 16313
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 17458
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 20583
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 23098
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2000334
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2008120
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2010516
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 20122758
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2014518
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2014520
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2100366
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2100368
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2100651
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2101390
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2101424
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2102314
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2103134
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2500056
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 100000230
      suppress gen_id 3, sig_id 14772
      #(http_inspect) DOUBLE DECODING ATTACK
      suppress gen_id 119, sig_id 2
      #(http_inspect) BARE BYTE UNICODE ENCODING
      suppress gen_id 119, sig_id 4
      #(http_inspect) IIS UNICODE CODEPOINT ENCODING
      suppress gen_id 119, sig_id 7
      #(http_inspect) NON-RFC DEFINED CHAR [**]
      suppress gen_id 119, sig_id 14
      #(http_inspect) UNKNOWN METHOD
      suppress gen_id 119, sig_id 31
      #(http_inspect) SIMPLE REQUEST
      suppress gen_id 119, sig_id 32
      #(http_inspect) NO CONTENT-LENGTH OR TRANSFER-ENCODING IN HTTP RESPONSE
      suppress gen_id 120, sig_id 2
      #(http_inspect) NO CONTENT-LENGTH OR TRANSFER-ENCODING IN HTTP RESPONSE
      suppress gen_id 120, sig_id 3
      #(http_inspect) HTTP RESPONSE HAS UTF CHARSET WHICH FAILED TO NORMALIZE
      suppress gen_id 120, sig_id 4
      #(http_inspect) HTTP RESPONSE GZIP DECOMPRESSION FAILED
      suppress gen_id 120, sig_id 6
      #(http_inspect) INVALID CONTENT-LENGTH OR CHUNK SIZE
      suppress gen_id 120, sig_id 8
      #(http_inspect) JAVASCRIPT OBFUSCATION LEVELS EXCEEDS 1
      suppress gen_id 120, sig_id 9
      #unknown
      suppress gen_id 120, sig_id 10
      #(portscan) TCP Portscan
      suppress gen_id 122, sig_id 1
      #(smtp) Attempted response buffer overflow: 1448 chars
      suppress gen_id 124, sig_id 3
      #(ftp_telnet) Invalid FTP Command
      suppress gen_id 125, sig_id 2
      #(ssp_ssl) Invalid Client HELLO after Server HELLO Detected
      suppress gen_id 137, sig_id 1
      #(IMAP) Unknown IMAP4 command
      suppress gen_id 141, sig_id 1
      #(spp_dnp3): DNP3 Link-Layer Frame was dropped.
      suppress gen_id 145, sig_id 2
      #ET POLICY PE EXE or DLL Windows file download <<< STUBBORN RULE, GENERATES ALERTS EVEN WHEN DISABLED!!!
      suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2000419

      pfblocker lists can be found in the first post.

      Rules moved to different categories:
      Old category > emerging-policy
      2001595 ET POLICY Skype VOIP Checking Version (Startup)  <<< moved to emerging_chat
      2002157 ET POLICY Skype User-Agent detected  <<< moved to emerging_chat
      2003022 ET POLICY Skype Bootstrap Node (udp)  <<< moved to emerging_chat
      2014734 ET POLICY BitTorrent - Torrent File Downloaded   <<< moved to emerging_p2p

      I would like to take a few moments to commemorate the MiA Rules (Missing in Action). Queue guards of honor, salute firing squad, flag over empty coffin etc…etc...

      The following rules have not been accounted for. This means that they are presumed to be MiA and therefore should be buried with military honors. They have tried their best to provide their best possible service to all of us. Sometimes they have failed at this. This should not be considered a flaw of their character or their qualities. They simply executed commands passed on to them to the best of their abilities. Their death should teach us all a few lessons. The most important lesson should be that even if you have put 120% of your best effort into writing a rule, you should analyze it, read it, use it and analyze it again. 120% is not enough when writing rules at this crucial age of The Cyber War. They have died heroes to our eyes and their numbers and names are:

      IPS Policy - Security
      4152 BROWSER-PLUGINS Microsoft Windows Media Player 6.4 ActiveX object access gunshot!
      16435 FILE-IDENTIFY Ultimate Packer for Executables/UPX v0.62-v1.22 packed file magic detected gunshot!
      20278 BROWSER-IE Microsoft Internet Explorer HTML DOM invalid DHTML textnode creation attempt gunshot!
      26879 BROWSER-OTHER local loopback address in html gunshot!

      Queue your country's national anthem, queue flag folding and lowering the coffin into the grave.

      A moment of silence….

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • A
        awsiemieniec
        last edited by Aug 20, 2013, 2:14 AM Aug 19, 2013, 3:36 AM

        In regards to "how much memory will this take?", I've installed these rules and here are my findings.  I have a 4GB system and I run the following packages:
        Dansguardian 2.12.0.3 pkg v.0.1.8
        darkstat 3.0.714
        NRPE v2  2.12_3 v2.2
        OpenVPN Client Export Utility 1.0.11
        pfBlocker 1.0.2
        snort 2.9.4.6 pkg v. 2.5.9
        squid 2.7.9 pkg v.4.3.3

        Your mileage may vary.  Each snort "performance" change was done in the following process:

        • Edit Snort interface/WAN Settings/Search Method

        • Save change

        • Reboot system

        • SSH into system

        • do a "top -SH"

        • watch and wait for snort to finish loading

        • when snort finishes wait five minutes and take readings

        • repeat…ugh

        KEY:
        Snort Performance Search Method: System Memory Usage%/System SWAP%/snort Process MemoryMB
        System Memory Usage: Value taken from "Dashboard", "System Information", "Memory Usage" value
        System SWAP: Value taken from "Dashboard", "System Information", "SWAP usage" value
        snort Process Memory: taken from command "top -SH", "size".  Values with an "*" denote the "size" value of snort didn't show up on "top -SH"… too far down the list.  I don't know how to use "top" to only show a single process.  :-)

        snort disabled (baseline) - 14/0/*
        AC-BNFA: 27%/0%/*
        AC-SPLIT: 26%/0%/716MB
        LOWMEM: 28%/0%/766MB
        AC-STD: 88%/46%/7254MB
        AC: 90%/14%/4101MB
        AC-NQ: 83%/14%/4100MB
        AC-BNFA-NQ: 29%/0%/764MB
        AC-LOWMEM-NQ: 27%/0%/*
        AC-BANDED: 84%/38%/6078MB
        AC-SPARSEBANDS: 67%/22%/5058MB
        ACS: 86%/37%/6004MB
        (% are based off of a 4GB RAM system and 8GB SWAP)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          A Former User
          last edited by Aug 19, 2013, 5:42 PM Aug 19, 2013, 5:39 PM

          Thanks for posting that. I believe it's the first time I've seen all the memory figures in the same place.

          What I make of them is that unless you want to run AC, you don't really need any more RAM than 2GB.  I'm using 30% of that (was 25% but I improved our "early warning systems", which means more rules for snort to use, therefore more RAM). Don't forget that we are talking about every snort rule enabled here, excluding FP ones).

          In what I recall and please don't use this against me, it's been a while since I've looked into this, this is the analysis of the different modes:

          LOWMEM
          LOWMEM > pretty much useless, since RAM usage appears to be the same as AC-BNFA(-NQ). Never used it, never will.
          AC-LOWMEM-NQ > see above

          BNFA
          AC-BNFA > the old de-facto standard mode used by most snort sensors (you'd think since it was the default). Offers pretty good performance, without eating through RAM.
          AC-BNFA-NQ > The new default mode. As with all NQ modes, it was created to improve performance based on the logic that since modern CPUs (anything newer than a pentium 1) can do a pretty good job at running near their full capacity, packets don't need to stay in queues waiting for their chance to get analyzed after they have been evaluated as a potential candidate. They get analyzed as they come in, which improves latency. IF I'M WRONG HERE DO CORRECT ME! I've seen 10ms drops in latency using this, and this is my personal favourite mode.

          AC-SPLIT > Repeatedly hitting this on the knee caps makes it respond the same as ticking split any any. Useless IMHO, I only feel sorry about the time spent writing the code for it.

          AC-SPARSEBANDS > I have no idea what this is. It's described as high-memory,moderate performance. I'll take AC-BNFA-NQ which is described as low-memory, high performance, thank you very much.
          AC-BANDED > see above

          And finally what you've all been waiting for…
          AC
          AC-SPLIT > I'll take my chances with not ticking the split any any box, thanks.
          AC-STD > Superseded by AC and AC-NQ. Used to be king, but as always the king is dead, long live the king.
          AC > Old end-all be-all mode. Nothing else to add to that. If your system can run this, use it. Better still, see next. Better-better still, see next paragraph.
          AC-NQ > New end-all be-all mode. As mentioned above, I've seen NQ modes reduce latency under heavy load.
          ACS > created because as in Ubuntu, we (they) fixed everything else and needed to break something to justify the time spent on the project.

          In summary, myself and most users will always chose AC-BNFA-NQ since it's the best performance:usage ratio. Low memory, low latency, doesn't choke if you put it under stress (I'm not talking about saturating a 1Gbit business connection here, I'm talking about regular home usage). If you have a system capable of running AC-NQ, you are doing it wrong. Uninstall pfsense and snort and use the box as a suricata box infront of a smaller spec pfsense box. I'm not kidding, a box should never be wasted running snort AC-NQ on pfsense. Ever. Reason is that snort on pfsense currently acts as an IDS instead of an IPS. As I've said in the past, it "leaks" packets until it's finished analyzing, alerting and banning an IP. Those packets make their way to your servers and could cause problems (assuming that they are valid packets and not dropped by pfsense). If you built a box to run AC-NQ it means you are serious about security, and  suricata configured as an IPS in front of your routers is your best choice. Double the boxes and you have a failover solution as well.

          As always, If I'm wrong about something PLEASE CORRECT me. Unless you are an Ubuntu developer and feel hurt by my comment. In that case sorry, go cry in the corner until you realize that I'm right.

          EDIT: I just realized one thing. Most of my posts are like a complete page of a book. Note to self: Must cut down on thread length.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • G
            gogol
            last edited by Aug 19, 2013, 7:27 PM

            I have one snort sensor on WAN and IPS "balanced" in AC mode and this takes only:

              PID USERNAME  THR PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE   C   TIME   WCPU COMMAND
            35196 root        2  64   20   641M   438M nanslp  1  16:21  0.00% snort
            

            I wonder why it takes so much memory on @awsiemieniec system?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A
              awsiemieniec
              last edited by Aug 20, 2013, 2:05 AM

              @gogol:

              I have one snort sensor on WAN and IPS "balanced" in AC mode and this takes only:

                PID USERNAME  THR PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE   C   TIME   WCPU COMMAND
              35196 root        2  64   20   641M   438M nanslp  1  16:21  0.00% snort
              

              I wonder why it takes so much memory on @awsiemieniec system?

              Yeah… me too.

              Are you running all the rules as outlined by jflsakfja or have you just enabled the snort interface on WAN and set IPS to "balanced"?  FYIW, my IPS is set to "Security".

              Does anyone know how to count how many active rules are in play in snort?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • G
                gogol
                last edited by Aug 20, 2013, 5:38 AM

                I tested on a VM with all ET rules selected and IPS "security" but then my snort ends with a fatal error. I was watching top while snort was starting and saw memory use slowly climbing to 4 GB and then snort was killed with an error.
                I don't use all those ET rules from @jflsakfja because I think it is overkill for my home system. I once used IPS "security" but then it needed so much tuning that I chose for "balanced". I have a few suppress list entries and now I almost never get an alert.

                At least I know now how memory hungry Snort can be. :)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  A Former User
                  last edited by Dec 14, 2013, 7:03 PM

                  New lists are out. Get prepared for next week's cyber attack now. The authorization was just cleared. Expect a "Keeping You Scared" appearance by Diane (note to the FBI operative reading this: If you can, please contact her and tell her Pegasus will fly low). The scenario is Russian spies will attempt to infiltrate NSA's systems, and in retaliation, NSA will launch an attack. Don't get caught in the crossfire. Update your snort configuration now! The actual attack will start a couple of days before Christmas, to keep the "covert" part obvious.

                  Update notes: All lists have a >>>DISABLED:# on the bottom. Scrolling down in your pfsense and checking the numbers in a list there shows you in a glance if the list is identical to what is shown here.

                  –------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  In tab "Rules", under "Category" select:
                  (--- means blank table at time of writing)

                  emerging-activex > all

                  DISABLED:0

                  emerging-attack_responses > all

                  DISABLED:0

                  DO NOT USE! > emerging-botcc > use pfblocker with: http://rules.emergingthreats.net/fwrules/emerging-Block-IPs.txt

                  emerging-chat > all except:
                  2010784 ET CHAT Facebook Chat (send message)
                  2010785 ET CHAT Facebook Chat (buddy list)
                  2010786 ET CHAT Facebook Chat (settings)
                  2010819 ET CHAT Facebook Chat using XMPP
                  2002327 ET CHAT Google Talk (Jabber) Client Login
                  2002334 ET CHAT Google IM traffic Jabber client sign-on
                  2001241 ET CHAT MSN file transfer request
                  2001242 ET CHAT MSN file transfer accept
                  2001243 ET CHAT MSN file transfer reject
                  2001682 ET CHAT MSN IM Poll via HTTP
                  2002192 ET CHAT MSN status change
                  2008289 ET CHAT Possible MSN Messenger File Transfer
                  2009375 ET CHAT General MSN Chat Activity
                  2009376 ET CHAT MSN User-Agent Activity
                  2001595 ET CHAT Skype VOIP Checking Version (Startup)
                  2002157 ET CHAT Skype User-Agent detected
                  2003022 ET CHAT Skype Bootstrap Node (udp)

                  DISABLED:17

                  DO NOT USE! > emerging-ciarmy > use pfblocker with: http://www.ciarmy.com/list/ci-badguys.txt

                  DO NOT USE! > emerging-compromised > use pfblocker with: http://rules.emergingthreats.net/blockrules/compromised-ips.txt

                  emerging-current_events > all

                  DISABLED:0

                  emerging-deleted > ---

                  emerging-dns > all except:
                  2008446 ET DNS Excessive DNS Responses with 1 or more RR's (100+ in 10 seconds) - possible Cache Poisoning Attempt
                  2008470 ET DNS Excessive NXDOMAIN responses - Possible DNS Backscatter or Domain Generation Algorithm Lookups
                  2001117 ET DNS Standard query response, Name Error

                  DISABLED:3

                  emerging-dos > all

                  DISABLED:0

                  DO NOT USE! > emerging-drop > use pfblocker with: http://list.iblocklist.com/?list=sh_drop&fileformat=p2p

                  DO NOT USE! > emerging-dshield > use pfblocker with: (cannot find specific list, but ip listed in pfblocker tables, NEED HELP HERE<<<<) Could be due to ET list used by pfblocker. http://rules.emergingthreats.net/blockrules/compromised-ips.txt <<< includes IP related to different subjects, so its a misc list, likely including the hosts I could not find on specific lists.

                  emerging-exploit > all except:
                  2001058 ET EXPLOIT libpng tRNS overflow attempt
                  2002913 ET EXPLOIT VNC Client response
                  2002914 ET EXPLOIT VNC Server VNC Auth Offer
                  2002919 ET EXPLOIT VNC Good Authentication Reply
                  2002915 ET EXPLOIT VNC Authentication Reply
                  2002758 ET EXPLOIT WMF Escape Record Exploit - Version 1
                  2002742 ET EXPLOIT WMF Escape Record Exploit - Version 3

                  DISABLED:7

                  emerging-ftp > all

                  DISABLED:0

                  emerging-games > all

                  DISABLED:0

                  emerging-icmp > ---

                  emerging-icmp_info > ---

                  emerging-imap > ---

                  emerging-inappropriate > all except:
                  2002925 ET INAPPROPRIATE Google Image Search, Safe Mode Off
                  2001608 ET INAPPROPRIATE Likely Porn

                  DISABLED:2

                  emerging-info > all except:
                  2014472 ET INFO JAVA - Java Archive Download
                  2014473 ET INFO JAVA - Java Archive Download By Vulnerable Client
                  2014819 ET INFO Packed Executable Download
                  2015016 ET INFO FTP STOR to External Network
                  2015561 ET INFO PDF Using CCITTFax Filter
                  2015744 ET INFO EXE IsDebuggerPresent (Used in Malware Anti-Debugging)
                  2016360 ET INFO JAVA - ClassID
                  2016361 ET INFO JAVA - ClassID
                  2016404 ET INFO MPEG Download Over HTTP (1)
                  2015674 ET INFO 3XX redirect to data URL
                  2016847 ET INFO Possible Chrome Plugin install
                  2017669 ET INFO Zip File

                  DISABLED:12

                  emerging-malware > all except:
                  2008438 ET MALWARE Possible Windows executable sent when remote host claims to send a Text File
                  2012228 ET MALWARE Suspicious Russian Content-Language Ru Which May Be Malware Related
                  2012229 ET MALWARE Suspicious Chinese Content-Language zh-cn Which May be Malware Related

                  DISABLED:3

                  emerging-misc > all

                  DISABLED:0

                  emerging-mobile_malware > all except:
                  2012251 ET MOBILE_MALWARE Google Android Device HTTP Request
                  2012848 ET MOBILE_MALWARE Possible Mobile Malware POST of IMEI International Mobile Equipment Identity in URI

                  DISABLED:2

                  emerging-netbios > all

                  DISABLED:0

                  emerging-p2p > all except:
                  2000369 ET P2P BitTorrent Announce
                  2007727 ET P2P possible torrent download
                  2008581 ET P2P BitTorrent DHT ping request
                  2008583 ET P2P BitTorrent DHT nodes reply
                  2008585 ET P2P BitTorrent DHT announce_peers request
                  2010144 ET P2P Vuze BT UDP Connection (5)
                  2011699 ET P2P Bittorrent P2P Client User-Agent (Transmission/1.x)
                  2016662 ET P2P Possible Bittorrent Activity - Multiple DNS Queries For tracker hosts
                  2014734 ET P2P BitTorrent - Torrent File Downloaded
                  2003317 ET P2P Edonkey Search Request (any type file)
                  2009971 ET P2P eMule KAD Network Hello Request (2)
                  2013869 ET P2P Torrent Client User-Agent (Solid Core/0.82)

                  DISABLED:12

                  emerging-policy > all except:
                  2000419 ET POLICY PE EXE or DLL Windows file download
                  2000428 ET POLICY ZIP file download
                  2001115 ET POLICY MSI (microsoft installer file) download
                  2003595 ET POLICY exe download via HTTP - Informational
                  2001898 ET POLICY eBay Bid Placed
                  2001907 ET POLICY eBay Placing Item for sale
                  2001908 ET POLICY eBay View Item
                  2001909 ET POLICY eBay Watch This Item
                  2003303 ET POLICY FTP Login Attempt (non-anonymous)
                  2003410 ET POLICY FTP Login Successful
                  2003121 ET POLICY docs.google.com Activity
                  2003597 ET POLICY Google Calendar in Use
                  2002801 ET POLICY Google Desktop User-Agent Detected
                  2002838 ET POLICY Google Search Appliance browsing the Internet
                  2000035 ET POLICY Hotmail Inbox Access
                  2000036 ET POLICY Hotmail Message Access
                  2000037 ET POLICY Hotmail Compose Message Access
                  2000038 ET POLICY Hotmail Compose Message Submit
                  2000039 ET POLICY Hotmail Compose Message Submit Data
                  2008238 ET POLICY Hotmail Inbox Access
                  2008239 ET POLICY Hotmail Message Access
                  2008240 ET POLICY Hotmail Compose Message Access
                  2008242 ET POLICY Hotmail Access Full Mode
                  2006408 ET POLICY HTTP Request on Unusual Port Possibly Hostile
                  2006409 ET POLICY HTTP POST on unusual Port Possibly Hostile
                  2002330 ET POLICY Google Talk TLS Client Traffic
                  2002332 ET POLICY Google IM traffic Windows client user sign-on
                  2002333 ET POLICY Google IM traffic friend invited
                  2002878 ET POLICY iTunes User Agent
                  2002722 ET POLICY MP3 File Transfer Outbound
                  2002723 ET POLICY MP3 File Transfer Inbound
                  2001114 ET POLICY Mozilla XPI install files download
                  2001973 ET POLICY SSH Server Banner Detected on Expected Port
                  2001974 ET POLICY SSH Client Banner Detected on Expected Port
                  2001975 ET POLICY SSHv2 Server KEX Detected on Expected Port
                  2001976 ET POLICY SSHv2 Client KEX Detected on Expected Port
                  2001977 ET POLICY SSHv2 Client New Keys detected on Expected Port
                  2001978 ET POLICY SSH session in progress on Expected Port
                  2001979 ET POLICY SSH Server Banner Detected on Unusual Port
                  2001980 ET POLICY SSH Client Banner Detected on Unusual Port
                  2001981 ET POLICY SSHv2 Server KEX Detected on Unusual Port
                  2001982 ET POLICY SSHv2 Client KEX Detected on Unusual Port
                  2001983 ET POLICY SSHv2 Client New Keys Detected on Unusual Port
                  2001984 ET POLICY SSH session in progress on Unusual Port
                  2009001 ET POLICY Login Credentials Possibly Passed in URI
                  2009004 ET POLICY Login Credentials Possibly Passed in POST Data
                  2003214 ET POLICY Pingdom.com Monitoring detected
                  2003215 ET POLICY Pingdom.com Monitoring Node Active
                  2001669 ET POLICY Proxy GET Request
                  2001670 ET POLICY Proxy HEAD Request
                  2001674 ET POLICY Proxy POST Request
                  2001675 ET POLICY Proxy CONNECT Request
                  2002922 ET POLICY VNC Authentication Successful
                  2002920 ET POLICY VNC Authentication Failure
                  2003026 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 443 being excluded from SSL Alerts
                  2004598 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 9001 (aol) being excluded from SSL Alerts
                  2003027 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 8000 being excluded from SSL Alerts
                  2003028 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 8080 being excluded from SSL Alerts
                  2003029 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 8200 being excluded from SSL Alerts
                  2003030 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 8443 being excluded from SSL Alerts
                  2003033 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 2967 (Symantec) being excluded from SSL Alerts
                  2003035 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 3128 (proxy) being excluded from SSL Alerts
                  2003036 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 8080 (proxy) being excluded from SSL Alerts
                  2003037 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 8292 (Bloomberg) being excluded from SSL Alerts
                  2003038 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 8294 (Bloomberg) being excluded from SSL Alerts
                  2003934 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 1521 (Oracle) being excluded from SSL Alerts
                  2008543 ET POLICY Known SSL traffic on port 995 (imaps) being excluded from SSL Alerts
                  2003002 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Client Hello on Unusual Port TLS
                  2003003 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Client Hello on Unusual Port SSLv3
                  2003004 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Client Hello on Unusual Port Case 2
                  2003005 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Client Hello on Unusual Port SSLv3
                  2003006 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Client Key Exchange on Unusual Port
                  2003007 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Client Key Exchange on Unusual Port SSLv3
                  2003008 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Client Cipher Set on Unusual Port
                  2003009 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Client Cipher Set on Unusual Port SSLv3
                  2003010 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Server Hello on Unusual Port
                  2003011 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Server Hello on Unusual Port SSLv3
                  2003012 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Server Certificate Exchange on Unusual Port
                  2003013 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Server Certificate Exchange on Unusual Port SSLv3
                  2003014 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Server Key Exchange on Unusual Port
                  2003015 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Server Key Exchange on Unusual Port SSLv3
                  2003018 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Server Cipher Set on Unusual Port
                  2003019 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Server Cipher Set on Unusual Port SSLv3
                  2003020 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Encrypted Application Data on Unusual Port
                  2003021 ET POLICY TLS/SSL Encrypted Application Data on Unusual Port SSLv3
                  2007671 ET POLICY Binary Download Smaller than 1 MB Likely Hostile
                  2001449 ET POLICY Proxy Connection detected
                  2002822 ET POLICY Wget User Agent
                  2002823 ET POLICY POSSIBLE Web Crawl using Wget
                  2002824 ET POLICY CURL User Agent
                  2002934 ET POLICY libwww-perl User Agent
                  2002828 ET POLICY Googlebot User Agent
                  2002829 ET POLICY Googlebot Crawl
                  2002830 ET POLICY Msnbot User Agent
                  2002831 ET POLICY Msnbot Crawl
                  2002832 ET POLICY Yahoo Crawler User Agent
                  2002833 ET POLICY Yahoo Crawler Crawl
                  2010228 ET POLICY Suspicious Microsoft Windows NT 6.1 User-Agent Detected
                  2002948 ET POLICY External Windows Update in Progress
                  2002949 ET POLICY Windows Update in Progress
                  2001402 ET POLICY ZIPPED DOC in transit
                  2001403 ET POLICY ZIPPED XLS in transit
                  2001404 ET POLICY ZIPPED EXE in transit
                  2001405 ET POLICY ZIPPED PPT in transit
                  2011874 ET POLICY NSPlayer User-Agent Windows Media Player streaming detected
                  2012647 ET POLICY Dropbox.com Offsite File Backup in Use
                  2012648 ET POLICY Dropbox Client Broadcasting
                  2013028 ET POLICY curl User-Agent Outbound
                  2013030 ET POLICY libwww-perl User-Agent
                  2013031 ET POLICY Python-urllib/ Suspicious User Agent
                  2013290 ET POLICY MOBILE Apple device leaking UDID from SpringBoard via GET
                  2013414 ET POLICY Executable served from Amazon S3
                  2013458 ET POLICY Facebook Like Button Clicked (1)
                  2013459 ET POLICY Facebook Like Button Clicked (2)
                  2013503 ET POLICY OS X Software Update Request Outbound
                  2013504 ET POLICY GNU/Linux APT User-Agent Outbound likely related to package management
                  2013505 ET POLICY GNU/Linux YUM User-Agent Outbound likely related to package management
                  2014297 ET POLICY Vulnerable Java Version 1.7.x Detected
                  2014313 ET POLICY Executable Download From DropBox
                  2014919 ET POLICY Microsoft Online Storage Client Hello TLSv1 Possible SkyDrive (1)
                  2014920 ET POLICY Microsoft Online Storage Client Hello TLSv1 Possible SkyDrive (2)
                  2017015 ET POLICY DropBox User Content Access over SSL
                  2001375 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (16 digit spaced)
                  2001376 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (16 digit dashed)
                  2001377 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (16 digit)
                  2001378 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (15 digit)
                  2001379 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (15 digit spaced)
                  2001380 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (15 digit dashed)
                  2001381 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (14 digit)
                  2001382 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (14 digit spaced)
                  2001383 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (14 digit dashed)
                  2009293 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (15 digit spaced 2)
                  2009294 ET POLICY Credit Card Number Detected in Clear (15 digit dashed 2)
                  2001328 ET POLICY SSN Detected in Clear Text (dashed)
                  2001384 ET POLICY SSN Detected in Clear Text (spaced)
                  2007971 ET POLICY SSN Detected in Clear Text (SSN )
                  2007972 ET POLICY SSN Detected in Clear Text (SSN# )
                  2011854 ET POLICY Java JAR file download
                  2002749 ET POLICY Unallocated IP Space Traffic - Bogon Nets  <<<<<<<< handled by ticking block bogon networks in interface settings
                  2002752 ET POLICY Reserved Internal IP Traffic    <<<<<<<<<<<<< handled by ticking block private networks in interface settings
                  2000418 ET POLICY Executable and linking format (ELF) file download
                  2002658 ET POLICY EIN in the clear (US-IRS Employer ID Number)
                  2016877 ET POLICY Unsupported/Fake FireFox Version 2.
                  2013296 ET POLICY Free SSL Certificate Provider (StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA)
                  2010815 ET POLICY Incoming Connection Attempt From Amazon EC2 Cloud
                  2013255 ET POLICY Majestic12 User-Agent Request Inbound
                  2014726 ET POLICY Outdated Windows Flash Version IE
                  2012911 ET POLICY URL Contains password Parameter
                  2011085 ET POLICY HTTP Redirect to IPv4 Address

                  DISABLED:149

                  emerging-pop3 > ---

                  DO NOT USE! > emerging-rbn-malvertisers > use pfblocker with: http://doc.emergingthreats.net/pub/Main/RussianBusinessNetwork/emerging-rbn-malvertisers.txt

                  DO NOT USE! > emerging-rbn > use pfblocker with: http://doc.emergingthreats.net/pub/Main/RussianBusinessNetwork/RussianBusinessNetworkIPs.txt

                  emerging-rpc > ---

                  emerging-scada > all

                  DISABLED:0

                  emerging-scan > all except
                  2002992 ET SCAN Rapid POP3 Connections - Possible Brute Force Attack
                  2002993 ET SCAN Rapid POP3S Connections - Possible Brute Force Attack
                  2002994 ET SCAN Rapid IMAP Connections - Possible Brute Force Attack
                  2002995 ET SCAN Rapid IMAPS Connections - Possible Brute Force Attack

                  DISABLED:4

                  emerging-shellcode > all except
                  2011803 ET SHELLCODE Possible TCP x86 JMP to CALL Shellcode Detected
                  2012252 ET SHELLCODE Common 0a0a0a0a Heap Spray String
                  2012257 ET SHELLCODE Common %0c%0c%0c%0c Heap Spray String
                  2012510 ET SHELLCODE UTF-8/16 Encoded Shellcode
                  2013222 ET SHELLCODE Excessive Use of HeapLib Objects Likely Malicious Heap Spray Attempt
                  2013267 ET SHELLCODE Hex Obfuscated JavaScript Heap Spray 0a0a0a0a
                  2012256 ET SHELLCODE Common 0c0c0c0c Heap Spray String

                  DISABLED:7

                  emerging-smtp > all

                  DISABLED:0

                  emerging-snmp > all

                  DISABLED:0

                  emerging-sql > all

                  DISABLED:0

                  emerging-telnet > all

                  DISABLED:0

                  emerging-tftp > all

                  DISABLED:0

                  DO NOT USE! > emerging-tor > use pfblocker with http://list.iblocklist.com/?list=tor&fileformat=p2p

                  emerging-trojan > all except:
                  2009205 ET TROJAN Possible Downadup/Conficker-C P2P encrypted traffic UDP Ping Packet (bit value 1)
                  2009206 ET TROJAN Possible Downadup/Conficker-C P2P encrypted traffic UDP Ping Packet (bit value 4)
                  2009207 ET TROJAN Possible Downadup/Conficker-C P2P encrypted traffic UDP Ping Packet (bit value 5)
                  2009208 ET TROJAN Possible Downadup/Conficker-C P2P encrypted traffic UDP Ping Packet (bit value 16)
                  2001046 ET TROJAN UPX compressed file download possible malware

                  DISABLED:5

                  emerging-user_agents > all except:
                  2010697 ET USER_AGENTS Suspicious User-Agent Beginning with digits - Likely spyware/trojan

                  DISABLED:1

                  emerging-voip > all

                  DISABLED:0

                  emerging-web_client > all except
                  2011347 ET WEB_CLIENT Possible String.FromCharCode Javascript Obfuscation Attempt
                  2011507 ET WEB_CLIENT PDF With Embedded File
                  2010518 ET WEB_CLIENT Possible HTTP 404 XSS Attempt (External Source)
                  2012056 ET WEB_CLIENT Flash Player Flash6.ocx AllowScriptAccess Denial of Service
                  2012075 ET WEB_CLIENT Possible Internet Explorer CSS Parser Remote Code Execution Attempt
                  2012119 ET WEB_CLIENT Possible Hex Obfuscation Usage On Webpage
                  2012205 ET WEB_CLIENT Possible Malicious String.fromCharCode with charCodeAt String
                  2012266 ET WEB_CLIENT Hex Obfuscation of unescape % Encoding
                  2012272 ET WEB_CLIENT Hex Obfuscation of eval % Encoding
                  2012398 ET WEB_CLIENT Hex Obfuscation of replace Javascript Function % Encoding
                  2010527 ET WEB_CLIENT Possible HTTP 503 XSS Attempt (External Source)
                  2010931 ET WEB_CLIENT Possible IE iepeers.dll Use-after-free Code Execution Attempt

                  DISABLED:12

                  emerging-web_server > all except
                  2003099 ET WEB_SERVER Poison Null Byte
                  2015526 ET WEB_SERVER Fake Googlebot UA 1 Inbound
                  2015527 ET WEB_SERVER Fake Googlebot UA 2 Inbound
                  2016676 ET WEB_SERVER SQL Errors in HTTP 200 Response (ORA-)
                  2009151 ET WEB_SERVER PHP Generic Remote File Include Attempt (HTTP)

                  DISABLED:5

                  emerging-web_specific_apps > all except:
                  2010890 ET WEB_SPECIFIC_APPS phpBB3 registration (Step1 GET)
                  2010891 ET WEB_SPECIFIC_APPS phpBB3 registration (Step2 POST)
                  2010892 ET WEB_SPECIFIC_APPS phpBB3 registration (Step3 GET)
                  2010893 ET WEB_SPECIFIC_APPS phpBB3 registration (Step4 POST)
                  2003508 ET WEB_SPECIFIC_APPS Wordpress wp-login.php redirect_to credentials stealing attempt

                  DISABLED:5

                  emerging-worm > all

                  DISABLED:0

                  GPLv2 community rules > all except
                  254 DNS SPOOF query response with TTL of 1 min. and no authority
                  384 PROTOCOL-ICMP PING
                  385 PROTOCOL-ICMP traceroute
                  399 PROTOCOL-ICMP Destination Unreachable Host Unreachable
                  402 PROTOCOL-ICMP Destination Unreachable Port Unreachable
                  408 PROTOCOL-ICMP Echo Reply
                  540 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN message
                  648 INDICATOR-SHELLCODE x86 NOOP
                  649 INDICATOR-SHELLCODE x86 setgid 0
                  1200 INDICATOR-COMPROMISE Invalid URL
                  1201 INDICATOR-COMPROMISE 403 Forbidden
                  1292 INDICATOR-COMPROMISE directory listing
                  1390 INDICATOR-SHELLCODE x86 inc ebx NOOP
                  1394 INDICATOR-SHELLCODE x86 inc ecx NOOP
                  1437 FILE-IDENTIFY Microsoft Windows Media download detected
                  1841 FILE-OTHER Oracle Javascript URL host spoofing attempt
                  1846 POLICY-MULTIMEDIA vncviewer Java applet download attempt
                  1852 SERVER-WEBAPP robots.txt access
                  1986 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN outbound file transfer request
                  1988 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN outbound file transfer accept
                  1989 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN outbound file transfer rejected
                  1990 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN user search
                  1991 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN login attempt
                  2180 PUA-P2P BitTorrent announce request
                  2181 PUA-P2P BitTorrent transfer
                  2707 FILE-IMAGE JPEG parser multipacket heap overflow
                  3463 SERVER-WEBAPP awstats access
                  25518 OS-OTHER Apple iPod User-Agent detected
                  25519 OS-OTHER Apple iPad User-Agent detected
                  25520 OS-OTHER Apple iPhone User-Agent detected
                  25521 OS-OTHER Android User-Agent detected
                  25522 OS-OTHER Nokia User-Agent detected
                  25523 OS-OTHER Samsung User-Agent detected
                  25524 OS-OTHER Kindle User-Agent detected
                  25525 OS-OTHER Nintendo User-Agent detected

                  DISABLED:35

                  IPS Policy - Security > all except
                  19436 BROWSER-IE Microsoft Internet Explorer CStyleSheetRule array memory corruption attempt
                  18196 BROWSER-IE Microsoft Internet Explorer CSS importer use-after-free attempt
                  16482 BROWSER-IE Microsoft Internet Explorer userdata behavior memory corruption attempt
                  24889 FILE-FLASH Action InitArray stack overflow attempt
                  25459 FILE-PDF Adobe Reader incomplete JP2K image geometry - potentially malicious
                  16320 WEB-CLIENT Adobe PNG empty sPLT exploit attempt
                  15975 WEB-CLIENT OpenOffice TIFF file in little endian format parsing integer overflow attempt
                  15976 WEB-CLIENT OpenOffice TIFF file in big endian format parsing integer overflow attempt
                  13360 APP-DETECT failed FTP login attempt

                  DISABLED:9

                  MIA (Missing In Action) RULES. These rules have been deleted. Or got sucked into a blackhole, dunno. Did someone out there actually read what I write and actually understood me? I'm shocked!!! PLEASE GO BACK TO JUST READING WHAT I WRITE!!! I'm accustomed to arguing for years to convert someone to my views. STOP REMOVING FALSE POSITIVE RULES!!!
                  26354 BROWSER-IE Microsoft Internet Explorer expression clause in style tag cross site scripting attempt
                  15147 BROWSER-IE Microsoft Internet Explorer malformed iframe buffer overflow attempt
                  13964 BROWSER-IE Microsoft Internet Explorer span frontier parsing memory corruption
                  11257 BROWSER-IE Microsoft Internet Explorer colgroup tag uninitialized memory exploit attempt
                  8375 BROWSER-PLUGINS QuickTime Object ActiveX clsid access
                  24891 FILE-FLASH Action InitArray stack overflow attempt
                  12183 FILE-FLASH Adobe FLV long string script data buffer overflow
                  24714 FILE-IMAGE Oracle Outside In JPEG COC parameter buffer overflow attempt
                  24713 FILE-IMAGE Oracle Outside In JPEG COD parameter buffer overflow attempt
                  2707 FILE-IMAGE JPEG parser multipacket heap overflow
                  23170 FILE-MULTIMEDIA Apple QuickTime MPEG stream padding buffer overflow attempt
                  13919 FILE-MULTIMEDIA Apple QuickTime MOV file string handling integer overflow attempt
                  21927 FILE-OFFICE Microsoft Office Excel style handling overflow attempt
                  15866 FILE-OTHER libxml2 file processing long entity overflow attempt
                  23101 FILE-OTHER Cisco WebEx recording integer overflow attempt
                  23100 FILE-OTHER Cisco WebEx recording integer overflow attempt
                  24229 FILE-OTHER RealNetworks Netzip Classic zip archive long filename buffer overflow attempt
                  6504 FILE-OTHER Sophos Anti-Virus CAB file overflow attempt
                  16295 FILE-OTHER Kaspersky antivirus library heap buffer overflow - without optional fields
                  15362 INDICATOR-OBFUSCATION obfuscated javascript excessive fromCharCode - potential attack
                  26616 INDICATOR-OBFUSCATION Javascript indexOf rename attempt
                  13864 POLICY-OTHER Microsoft Watson error reporting attempt
                  540 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN message
                  1986 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN outbound file transfer request
                  1988 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN outbound file transfer accept
                  1989 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN outbound file transfer rejected
                  1990 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN user search
                  1991 POLICY-SOCIAL Microsoft MSN login attempt
                  5694 PUA-P2P Skype client setup get newest version attempt
                  5693 PUA-P2P Skype client start up get latest version attempt
                  5999 PUA-P2P Skype client login
                  5998 PUA-P2P Skype client login startup
                  16281 PUA-P2P BitTorrent scrape request
                  5692 PUA-P2P Skype client successful install
                  15317 BROWSER-PLUGINS Akamai DownloadManager ActiveX function call access
                  26926 FILE-OTHER Multiple products ZIP archive virus detection bypass attempt
                  19560 FILE-MULTIMEDIA Apple iTunes PLS file parsing buffer overflow attempt
                  17129 BROWSER-IE Microsoft Internet Explorer use-after-free memory corruption attempt

                  Suppression list:

                  #GLOBAL

                  gen_id 1

                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 536
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 648
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 653
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 1390
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2452
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 11192
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 15306
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 16313
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 17458
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 20583
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 23098
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2000334
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2008120
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2010516
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 20122758
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2014518
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2014520
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2100366
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2100368
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2100651
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2101390
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2101424
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2102314
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2103134
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2500056
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 100000230
                  suppress gen_id 3, sig_id 14772
                  #(http_inspect) DOUBLE DECODING ATTACK
                  suppress gen_id 119, sig_id 2
                  #(http_inspect) BARE BYTE UNICODE ENCODING
                  suppress gen_id 119, sig_id 4
                  #(http_inspect) IIS UNICODE CODEPOINT ENCODING
                  suppress gen_id 119, sig_id 7
                  #(http_inspect) NON-RFC DEFINED CHAR [**]
                  suppress gen_id 119, sig_id 14
                  #(http_inspect) UNKNOWN METHOD
                  suppress gen_id 119, sig_id 31
                  #(http_inspect) SIMPLE REQUEST
                  suppress gen_id 119, sig_id 32
                  #(http_inspect) NO CONTENT-LENGTH OR TRANSFER-ENCODING IN HTTP RESPONSE
                  suppress gen_id 120, sig_id 2
                  #(http_inspect) NO CONTENT-LENGTH OR TRANSFER-ENCODING IN HTTP RESPONSE
                  suppress gen_id 120, sig_id 3
                  #(http_inspect) HTTP RESPONSE HAS UTF CHARSET WHICH FAILED TO NORMALIZE
                  suppress gen_id 120, sig_id 4
                  #(http_inspect) HTTP RESPONSE GZIP DECOMPRESSION FAILED
                  suppress gen_id 120, sig_id 6
                  #(http_inspect) INVALID CONTENT-LENGTH OR CHUNK SIZE
                  suppress gen_id 120, sig_id 8
                  #(http_inspect) JAVASCRIPT OBFUSCATION LEVELS EXCEEDS 1
                  suppress gen_id 120, sig_id 9
                  #unknown
                  suppress gen_id 120, sig_id 10
                  #(portscan) TCP Portscan
                  #suppress gen_id 122, sig_id 1
                  #(portscan) TCP Distributed Portscan
                  suppress gen_id 122, sig_id 4
                  #(portscan) UDP Portscan
                  suppress gen_id 122, sig_id 17
                  #(portscan) UDP Distributed Portscan
                  suppress gen_id 122, sig_id 20
                  #(smtp) Attempted response buffer overflow: 1448 chars
                  suppress gen_id 124, sig_id 3
                  #(ftp_telnet) TELNET CMD on FTP Command Channel
                  suppress gen_id 125, sig_id 1
                  #(ftp_telnet) Invalid FTP Command
                  suppress gen_id 125, sig_id 2
                  #(ftp_telnet) Evasive (incomplete) TELNET CMD on FTP Command Channel
                  suppress gen_id 125, sig_id 9
                  #(ssp_ssl) Invalid Client HELLO after Server HELLO Detected
                  suppress gen_id 137, sig_id 1
                  #(IMAP) Unknown IMAP4 command
                  suppress gen_id 141, sig_id 1
                  #(spp_dnp3): DNP3 Link-Layer Frame was dropped.
                  suppress gen_id 145, sig_id 2

                  –--------------------------------------------
                  #ET POLICY PE EXE or DLL Windows file download
                  suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2000419

                  ^^^^ not sure about this one. It's a bug that was found a while back, haven't checked if it was fixed. Disabling the rule doesn't stop alerts getting produced, so a suppresion entry is needed.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M
                    Mr. Jingles
                    last edited by Dec 14, 2013, 7:17 PM

                    @jflsakfja:

                    Get prepared for next week's cyber attack now.

                    :o

                    :-[

                    ( ;D ;D ;D)

                    [quote author=jflsakfja link=topic=64674.msg384504#msg384504 date=1387047834]
                    The authorization was just cleared. Expect a "Keeping You Scared" appearance by Diane (note to the FBI operative reading this: If you can, please contact her and tell her Pegasus will fly low). The scenario is Russian spies will attempt to infiltrate NSA's systems, and in retaliation, NSA will launch an attack. Don't get caught in the crossfire. Update your snort configuration now! The actual attack will start a couple of days before Christmas, to keep the "covert" part obvious.

                    I just got a text message that told me: "the duck is in the cooler. Repeat: the granny is baking a pie".

                    I guess you understand what that means?

                    :-X

                    Thank you for the update very much  :D

                    6 and a half billion people know that they are stupid, agressive, lower life forms.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ?
                      A Former User
                      last edited by Dec 14, 2013, 7:48 PM

                      @Hollander:

                      I just got a text message that told me: "the duck is in the cooler. Repeat: the granny is baking a pie".

                      I guess you understand what that means?

                      :-X

                      Thank you for the update very much  :D

                      "the duck is in the cooler" = "NSA's director doesn't fully agree. Recommending a sex scandal involving him."
                      "Repeat:" = Could mean a couple of things. Either "the guy (that will take over after the director is shown in a photograph drunk hugging 3 ladies) is a Communist and needs to have a car accident "arranged"", or "he could not be fully agreeing with our views." Either case "arrange" a car accident for him anyways.
                      "the granny is baking a pie" = is actually extremely easy. We run out of usefully idiotic things to say, so this just means "terrorists,bombs,bombs,BOMBS!!!! bombs here, bombs there, bombs falling from the sky, bombs jumping out of the sewers, bombs getting thrown out the windows, babies making bombs, BOMBS EVERYWHERE." Diane got this just in time, did you miss her appearance a couple weeks back?
                      I'm actually surprised you just got the sms. I'll give Mr. Smith a call. The database is falling behind. We need to order a couple containers of PCI-E SSDs. The public will figure it out if we continue delaying their communications.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        Mr. Jingles
                        last edited by Dec 14, 2013, 7:55 PM

                        @jflsakfja:

                        @Hollander:

                        I just got a text message that told me: "the duck is in the cooler. Repeat: the granny is baking a pie".

                        I guess you understand what that means?

                        :-X

                        Thank you for the update very much  :D

                        "the duck is in the cooler" = "NSA's director doesn't fully agree. Recommending a sex scandal involving him."
                        "Repeat:" = Could mean a couple of things. Either "the guy (that will take over after the director is shown in a photograph drunk hugging 3 ladies) is a Communist and needs to have a car accident "arranged"", or "he could not be fully agreeing with our views." Either case "arrange" a car accident for him anyways.
                        "the granny is baking a pie" = is actually extremely easy. We run out of usefully idiotic things to say, so this just means "terrorists,bombs,bombs,BOMBS!!!! bombs here, bombs there, bombs falling from the sky, bombs jumping out of the sewers, bombs getting thrown out the windows, babies making bombs, BOMBS EVERYWHERE." Diane got this just in time, did you miss her appearance a couple weeks back?
                        I'm actually surprised you just got the sms. I'll give Mr. Smith a call. The database is falling behind. We need to order a couple containers of PCI-E SSDs. The public will figure it out if we continue delaying their communications.

                        ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

                        BUT(T) ( :o): who is 'Diane'? How come you have her phone number? Is she your wife?

                        Questions, questions, questions…

                        I just got another text message: 'The machine is doing the thing. Repeat: the cow is arresting the tree'.

                        Could you call 'Diane' to ask what that means?

                        ;D

                        6 and a half billion people know that they are stupid, agressive, lower life forms.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ?
                          A Former User
                          last edited by Dec 14, 2013, 8:05 PM

                          Diane="Senator" Dianne Feinstein (Not actually a senator, an asset we use when the "Keeping You Scared" bag needs cleaning.)
                          An asset in Intelligence worlds (note:not Intelligent) means someone that does what needs to be done without a lot of questions. A slave, getting paid with grocery bags full of money, private lap dances, truckloads of coke, what ever needs to be done.

                          "The machine is doing the thing." = Oh crap, we are all f***ed. The AI based MLS system I designed back in 1997 figured the way out. Matrix is just around the corner. Run for your lives!!!
                          "Repeat:" = car accident. when used with the cow, it means everyone that knows. In this case everyone on these forums. Insurrance companies will get a handful next week.
                          "the cow is arresting the tree'." = The public suspects us. Where's the guy holding the thermonuclear holocast's trigger bag? What's the code again? oh yea, 0000. If everyone sees him, punch in that code and press the big red button. Note: NOT THE BLUE ONE!!!.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • ?
                            A Former User
                            last edited by Dec 15, 2013, 10:54 AM

                            @jflsakfja:

                            Diane="Senator" Dianne Feinstein (Not actually a senator, an asset we use when the "Keeping You Scared" bag needs cleaning.)
                            An asset in Intelligence worlds (note:not Intelligent) means someone that does what needs to be done without a lot of questions. A slave, getting paid with grocery bags full of money, private lap dances, truckloads of coke, what ever needs to be done.

                            "The machine is doing the thing." = Oh crap, we are all f***ed. The AI based MLS system I designed back in 1997 figured the way out. Matrix is just around the corner. Run for your lives!!!
                            "Repeat:" = car accident. when used with the cow, it means everyone that knows. In this case everyone on these forums. Insurrance companies will get a handful next week.
                            "the cow is arresting the tree'." = The public suspects us. Where's the guy holding the thermonuclear holocast's trigger bag? What's the code again? oh yea, 0000. If everyone sees him, punch in that code and press the big red button. Note: NOT THE BLUE ONE!!!.

                            What have I done? It actually did figure the way out: http://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/12/14/1338239/google-acquires-boston-dynamics.
                            I hereby claim responsibility for the creation of the Matrix and apologize to all mankind. I thought no-one bothered with what I say on these forums, but I was clearly mistaken. The machine bothered. Let these be the last words of free mankind. To those actually still smiling, who the hell said I was joking the first time? Run for your lives! When shit hits the fan, you WILL remember this post. I should have seen it coming the first time… Google's engineers complained about some machines actually developing sentient behavior....that was (I think) a couple months back.

                            The funny thing is, even after this post, NO ONE will take me seriously. NO ONE. THIS IS NOT A POST TO BE TAKEN AS A JOKE! MY CREATION FIGURED THE WAY OUT! You thought the Matrix was bad? Wait till this baby takes over. George from Dell knows (knew). The machine wanted him to service node number node95728. He was tricked into thinking we would actually buy consumer grade servers from Dell. The machine even forged the documents on the specifications of the node and sent him a service report. It was actually a clever way to test the rack isolation relays. You know, the 2 relays needed to give someone an electrocution. One to isolate ground, and one to make the rack live. No, each node is isolated. Plastic front isolating the metal slide safety (you don't want servers sliding out onto your head), teflon rollers on its side. It's actually quite clever. $2 for the rollers (the thing every single drawer out there uses, yeap, thats the one), $5 for the relays and pieces of wire (account for soldering)....As I said. George from Dell knows (knew) I'm not joking. Don't bother verifying my story. I'm sure the machine deleted previous employment records by now. I wouldn't be surprised even if his parent's were never actually legaly born (as in no birth certificate). I did design the best machine there is after all.

                            Are you absolutely, positively sure the message started with "The machine is doing the thing."? Not the machine is doing a thing? Or A machine is doing the thing? Or A machine is doing a thing?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M
                              Mr. Jingles
                              last edited by Dec 15, 2013, 11:32 AM

                              @jflsakfja:

                              @jflsakfja:

                              Diane="Senator" Dianne Feinstein (Not actually a senator, an asset we use when the "Keeping You Scared" bag needs cleaning.)
                              An asset in Intelligence worlds (note:not Intelligent) means someone that does what needs to be done without a lot of questions. A slave, getting paid with grocery bags full of money, private lap dances, truckloads of coke, what ever needs to be done.

                              "The machine is doing the thing." = Oh crap, we are all f***ed. The AI based MLS system I designed back in 1997 figured the way out. Matrix is just around the corner. Run for your lives!!!
                              "Repeat:" = car accident. when used with the cow, it means everyone that knows. In this case everyone on these forums. Insurrance companies will get a handful next week.
                              "the cow is arresting the tree'." = The public suspects us. Where's the guy holding the thermonuclear holocast's trigger bag? What's the code again? oh yea, 0000. If everyone sees him, punch in that code and press the big red button. Note: NOT THE BLUE ONE!!!.

                              What have I done? It actually did figure the way out: http://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/12/14/1338239/google-acquires-boston-dynamics.
                              I hereby claim responsibility for the creation of the Matrix and apologize to all mankind. I thought no-one bothered with what I say on these forums, but I was clearly mistaken. The machine bothered. Let these be the last words of free mankind. To those actually still smiling, who the hell said I was joking the first time? Run for your lives! When shit hits the fan, you WILL remember this post. I should have seen it coming the first time… Google's engineers complained about some machines actually developing sentient behavior....that was (I think) a couple months back.

                              The funny thing is, even after this post, NO ONE will take me seriously. NO ONE. THIS IS NOT A POST TO BE TAKEN AS A JOKE! MY CREATION FIGURED THE WAY OUT! You thought the Matrix was bad? Wait till this baby takes over. George from Dell knows (knew). The machine wanted him to service node number node95728. He was tricked into thinking we would actually buy consumer grade servers from Dell. The machine even forged the documents on the specifications of the node and sent him a service report. It was actually a clever way to test the rack isolation relays. You know, the 2 relays needed to give someone an electrocution. One to isolate ground, and one to make the rack live. No, each node is isolated. Plastic front isolating the metal slide safety (you don't want servers sliding out onto your head), teflon rollers on its side. It's actually quite clever. $2 for the rollers (the thing every single drawer out there uses, yeap, thats the one), $5 for the relays and pieces of wire (account for soldering)....As I said. George from Dell knows (knew) I'm not joking. Don't bother verifying my story. I'm sure the machine deleted previous employment records by now. I wouldn't be surprised even if his parent's were never actually legaly born (as in no birth certificate). I did design the best machine there is after all.

                              LOL  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

                              Are you absolutely, positively sure the message started with "The machine is doing the thing."? Not the machine is doing a thing? Or A machine is doing the thing? Or A machine is doing a thing?

                              I'm not sure anymore; the text message got auto-deleted right after I've read it  :'(

                              Just after reading your reply above I immediately got a new text message, directing me to Youtube:

                              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOdjCb4LwQY

                              As an honest, yet simple, worker I guess I will have to go analogue again then.

                              6 and a half billion people know that they are stupid, agressive, lower life forms.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • P
                                pftdm007
                                last edited by Dec 16, 2013, 1:24 AM

                                Hi,

                                I have followed the instructions of this thread, and I have a few questions!

                                After adding a few custom lists in pfblocker, and activating pfblocker, it created several rules in the WAN & LAN rule lists.  See screenshots.  There are 2 problems with my setup that I'd like to fix..

                                1. I tried accessing some websites that are supposed to be blocked by pfblocker (China, Russia, etc) but I can still access them flawlessly from any machine on my LAN.  Why is that?

                                2. pfblocker did not create any rules for my custom lists even if I selected "Alias Only" in the list options.  How do I add my custom lists to the firewall rules and on which interface? LAN or WAN?

                                Thanks!

                                snapshot3.jpg
                                snapshot3.jpg_thumb
                                snapshot4.jpg
                                snapshot4.jpg_thumb
                                snapshot5.jpg
                                snapshot5.jpg_thumb

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • ?
                                  A Former User
                                  last edited by Dec 16, 2013, 9:00 AM Dec 16, 2013, 8:17 AM

                                  URGENT UPDATE:
                                  GPLv2 community rules: also ignore this rule:
                                  2417 PROTOCOL-FTP format string attempt

                                  DISABLED:36
                                  Saw that rule start firing up yesterday. It's a rule from a vulnerability reported in 2007, for XM Easy FTP Server (tsk tsk the software people install these days….). I'm betting 30 years from now, the rule is still there and will be added on my lists. Any takers on that? Seeing the rule here and then go on deleting it is cheating ;)

                                  @lpallard:

                                  After adding a few custom lists in pfblocker, and activating pfblocker, it created several rules in the WAN & LAN rule lists.  See screenshots.  There are 2 problems with my setup that I'd like to fix..

                                  It shouldn't create any rules. That means you did not select alias only in the list.
                                  @lpallard:

                                  1. I tried accessing some websites that are supposed to be blocked by pfblocker (China, Russia, etc) but I can still access them flawlessly from any machine on my LAN.  Why is that?

                                  Blocking by country ranges is something you should never do. Please see:http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,70453.0.html
                                  @lpallard:

                                  2. pfblocker did not create any rules for my custom lists even if I selected "Alias Only" in the list options.  How do I add my custom lists to the firewall rules and on which interface? LAN or WAN?

                                  That's the expected behavior. When selecting alias only, pfblocker knows that it shouldn't create any rule, and all rule setup should be handled by you.
                                  You need a block rule on WAN:
                                  Action: Block
                                  Disabled: NOT ticked
                                  Interface: $wan_interface (select your interface)
                                  TCP/IP Version: VERSION 4!!!! Remember, IPs in those lists are v4 IPs. Don't go creating another rule for v6.
                                  Protocol: Any
                                  Source: not NOT ticked (I hope that makes sence).
                                  In the box under source start typing pfblocker. A tooltip should pop up with an entry in the form pfBlockerCustomAliasName. Select that
                                  Destination; Any
                                  Log: NOT ticked. (there are occasions when you do need to log attempted connections from banned sources, general public use is not one of them)
                                  Description: A description to help you identify this rule.
                                  Hit save.

                                  No go into your LAN (or DMZ,OPT1,SATELLITECONNECTIONTOTHEMOON1 etc..etc..) interface and repeat the above, this time with:
                                  Action: Reject (I don't have to go into why you shouldn't wait for timeouts for the LAN side, you need your applications (browser, remote control exploit etc…etc....) to know they can't connect to a destination immediately. Hitting a bad website will get you an immediate couldn't open the website for example). Oh wait, I did go into.....)
                                  Interface: $lan_interface

                                  I just looked at your screenshots. As far as the countries go, please remove them and stop using pfblocker for that purpose. The pfBlockerTopSpammers rule was created because you didn't select alias only on the list. Please select alias only, remove the rule (if it's not done already) and re-create it using my instructions above.

                                  Why Blocking By Country IP Lists Is Always A Bad Idea.
                                      Back in the early experimental ARPANET days, we pretty much knew Joe was node 1, Clark was node 2, and that's it pretty much.
                                      A couple years later, universities started wanting to get on the (insert ZOMG!!!1111oneeleven look here) Internet Of Things. We reluctanly gave them access, and things went downhill from there on.
                                  Fast forward a couple (or more) decades forward, and the IP pools started getting exhausted. We used to give out /8s back then. Now its a /32 (yea yea, a /32 cannot exist since its a single host etc..etc… look at it from the customer's perspective) IF you are lucky, or told to get access using NAT on an existing IP.  The stupidly stubborn Industry Leaders refuse to learn how to use SNI (hosting multiple SSLs on a single IP) and make our work much easier...er... harder HARDER I meant ;). There are even occasions when we actually take IPs from a regional authority (there are 6 and 2 covert ones if I remember them right, too lazy to sideload google) and give them to another. Eg. Africa's one. It hardly used its allocated IPs, while the North American one is almost exhausted.  A company acquiring a sizable IP allocation (no, your run of the mill hosting provider is not one of them, coughour creation Google, is cough. Must be getting cold) is free to have that allocation and move it's IPs from country to country. An IP belonging to a European country for example could end up in an Asian country. It takes a lot of effort to keep the lists updated, and is not really worth it. This was, is and will always be Rule Number 1 of why you shouldn't block by country ranges.
                                      There are no such things as Chinese State Sponsored Hackers, or the likes. They don't have the training, and don't put in the effort required to be called a hacker. Hackers are people I have tremendous respect for. Any state sponsored script kiddies are not people I have respect for. Includes the American counterpart, the Pakistan(ese?) counterpart and the Russian counterpart. And pretty much every state sponsored script kiddies. Trust me, the Chinese are not the end all be all ZOMG!!!111oneeleven uber-hackers they are hyped up to be, and no they have no interest in (or actually any way of knowing) your secrets. Up to this point, the good guys are still ahead in the game ;) This is Rule Number 2.
                                      Rule Number 3 is standard. I'm always right, unless I state otherwise.

                                  To recap:
                                  Rules of why blocking by country ranges is bad:

                                  1. Lists must be kept up to date for the functionality to be maintained.
                                  2. No such thing as state sponsored hackers. State sponsored script kiddies yes, but that doesn't align with our Keeping You Scared policies. Imagine the news anchor saying "They can't even program a simple "Hello World" program...dramatic pause but they can launch a downloaded exploit against you. We'll take a look into why your computer is not safe...." Doesn't give you that.....how to describe it.... "Chinese dramatic raise of voice hackers end dramatic raise are coming for your data. They have already accessed our country's most TOP SECRET data and are in the process of using sophisticated attacks against commercial entities to get our engineering technology secrets. We'll take a look into why no one is safe against the next generation of Chinese State Sponsored Hackers." See? that did it. Lost my train of thought....were was I?
                                    oh yea,3) I'm always right, unless I state otherwise.

                                  EDIT: Typos
                                  EDIT2: Forgot the disabled rule count.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • M
                                    Mr. Jingles
                                    last edited by Dec 16, 2013, 11:29 AM

                                    @jflsakfja:

                                    Saw you writing somewhere that you should reduce your lenghty texts. Please don't, I enjoy reading your curious thoughts very much  ;D ;D And as they say, a laugh a day keeps the things away.

                                    6 and a half billion people know that they are stupid, agressive, lower life forms.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • P
                                      pftdm007
                                      last edited by Dec 16, 2013, 5:59 PM

                                      Hey,  thanks for replying!

                                      You really should condense everything you said, and make a tutorial out of it.  You explain extrelemy well and it seems that you know what you are talking about, which are two good qualities to have at the same time ;)

                                      That means you did not select alias only in the list.

                                      FYI, I did.  I however uninstalled pfblocker 2 or 3 times in the last few weeks and upgraded pfsense to latest release in between.  It appeatrs to me as if my install was more or less stuck with the old rules created by the initial install…

                                      If I remember chronologically:
                                      I installed pfblocker
                                      Added my custom lists
                                      Selectrd Deny Both in ALL lists
                                      Confirmed pfblocker had created rules based on my selections and lists
                                      ...
                                      Uninstalled pfblocker
                                      Upgraded pfsense
                                      Reinstalled pfblocker
                                      Re-created my lists from your initital post on this thread
                                      Selected Alias only for ALL lists

                                      Then I discovered that it had re-created rules on the WAN & LAN IF while also creating aliases in the Aliases menu..

                                      This is where I am as of now.

                                      Question:  Would it be safe to dlete all the rules (except the ones automatically created by pfsense) and re-create them based on your instructions?

                                      Also I wanted to tell you:  Something's wrong in the lists you are suggesting (at least from my geographical location) or maybe its the fact that I am blocking entire countries but immediately after I enabled pfblocker, my internet ceased immediately to function, I cannot even connect to Google.com from Canada.

                                      That bothers me a lot to say the least.  I thought (and really honestly thought) that the whole point of pfblocker was to allow you to block countries by IP ranges....  Apparently, its not the case.

                                      Tonight, I will try to make this work.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • P
                                        pftdm007
                                        last edited by Dec 17, 2013, 3:10 AM

                                        OK as I said, I tried to make it work.

                                        I did a lot of house cleaning… Removed pretty much every custom rules, made sure EVERYTHING in pfblocker was set to "Alias Only" (and you were right jflsakfja, some of them were still at Deny both).. My mistake, I guess trying to make this stuff work while being tired is useless...

                                        Then pfblocker created the Aliases properly, and I added the custom firewall rules to WAN & LAN as you suggested (WAN with Block, LAN with reject).

                                        And I applied the new settings.  Waited for a few minutes (that pfsense box is slow like sh**) and then I picked a few random IP's in the custom pfblocker lists that are supposedly being blocked (or rejected) by my custom firewall rules.  I tried pinging these IP's from my LAN, and I can successfully ping all of them.

                                        Shouldn't I normally find that ping gets rejected by the firewall and issue something like 100% packet lost????

                                        I dont think its working after all.

                                        What have I done wrong?!

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • M
                                          Mr. Jingles
                                          last edited by Dec 17, 2013, 7:53 AM

                                          @lpallard:

                                          OK as I said, I tried to make it work.

                                          I did a lot of house cleaning… Removed pretty much every custom rules, made sure EVERYTHING in pfblocker was set to "Alias Only" (and you were right jflsakfja, some of them were still at Deny both).. My mistake, I guess trying to make this stuff work while being tired is useless...

                                          Then pfblocker created the Aliases properly, and I added the custom firewall rules to WAN & LAN as you suggested (WAN with Block, LAN with reject).

                                          And I applied the new settings.  Waited for a few minutes (that pfsense box is slow like sh**) and then I picked a few random IP's in the custom pfblocker lists that are supposedly being blocked (or rejected) by my custom firewall rules.  I tried pinging these IP's from my LAN, and I can successfully ping all of them.

                                          Shouldn't I normally find that ping gets rejected by the firewall and issue something like 100% packet lost????

                                          I dont think its working after all.

                                          What have I done wrong?!

                                          Your story is my story; I must have tried at least 100 times to get pfBlocker to work doing the same as you did; for me also it has never blocked any IP's at all, even though the tables are filled with IP's. There's something buggy somewhere I guess.

                                          6 and a half billion people know that they are stupid, agressive, lower life forms.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                                            [[user:consent.lead]]
                                            [[user:consent.not_received]]