Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    DNS Resolver

    2.2 Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    44
    186
    133.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      dstroot
      last edited by

      @CMB - thanks for the swift response.  I know you are working at banging out 2.2.

      Can you elaborate what "forwarding mode" does for unbound?  I want unbound to cache DNS queries and be the DNS server for my LAN.  I was under the impression I needed it on so unbound would be a cache server and "forward" the results of my main DNS servers (for example say 8.8.8.8).

      BTW I did turn forwarding off to see what happens and the DNS hijacking stopped.  Thx for that tip!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P
        phil.davis
        last edited by

        Forwarding mode means it will just send queries (for domains not already in the cache) directly upstream to the defined upstream DNS server/s it has been told about.
        With recursion, unbound does its queries directly through the chain of internet root servers down to the authoritative server for the requested domain, thus avoiding using some intermediate upstream DNS and its cache, but keeps a cache for itself.
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Name_System#Recursive_and_caching_name_server

        As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
        If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          dstroot
          last edited by

          So it caches either way?

          So what is the use case for the forwarder option?  To force something like OpenDNS?  Because it sounds as if the non-forwarder behavior is the most accurate option, no?  (maybe slower?).

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            phil.davis
            last edited by

            For example, I subscribe to the DynDNS "Internet Guide" service (it is cheap for 10 public IPs). So it can filter name responses for categories of sites (porn, violent…). That does a good job of keeping staff away from that sort of content.
            So I want the pfSense DNS to just forward to DynDNS servers, because I really do want a changed (filtered) view of what the real root servers have.

            As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
            If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P
              phil.davis
              last edited by

              DNS Forwarder Host Overrides - the aliases (if any) of the main host override display on the main screen, in addition to the main override entry itself.
              DNS Resolver Host Overrides - the aliases (if any) of the main host override do not display on the main screen. Only the main override entry itself is displayed.
              It is not effecting what is stored in the actual config. When you edit a DNS Resolver Host Override the aliases are there.

              Does anybody care?
              Leave it as it is?

              DNS-Forwarder-Host-Overrides.png
              DNS-Forwarder-Host-Overrides.png_thumb
              DNS-Resolver-Host-Override-entry.png
              DNS-Resolver-Host-Override-entry.png_thumb
              DNS-Resolver-Host-Overrides.png
              DNS-Resolver-Host-Overrides.png_thumb

              As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
              If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                cmb
                last edited by

                It'd be nice to have that back if you'd like to put in a pull request Phil. If not, it's not a big deal.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Raul RamosR
                  Raul Ramos
                  last edited by

                  Hi

                  Is asking to match if the aliases appears like expanded p2 in IPsec, more or less?

                  Thanks

                  Edit: Can't start Resolver with DHCP Registration (Register DHCP leases in the DNS Resolver) checked.

                  Resolver log:

                  Nov 19 18:13:32	unbound: [86446:0] notice: Restart of unbound 1.4.22.
Nov 19 18:13:32	unbound: [86446:0] fatal error: Could not read config file: /unbound.conf
Nov 19 18:14:04	unbound: [40605:0] notice: init module 0: iterator
Nov 19 18:14:04	unbound: [40605:0] info: start of service (unbound 1.4.22).
Nov 19 18:14:04	unbound: [40605:0] info: service stopped (unbound 1.4.22).
Nov 19 18:14:04	unbound: [40605:0] info: server stats for thread 0: 0 queries, 0 answers from cache, 0 recursions, 0 prefetch
Nov 19 18:14:04	unbound: [40605:0] info: server stats for thread 0: requestlist max 0 avg 0 exceeded 0 jostled 0
Nov 19 18:14:04	unbound: [40605:0] info: server stats for thread 1: 0 queries, 0 answers from cache, 0 recursions, 0 prefetch
Nov 19 18:14:04	unbound: [40605:0] info: server stats for thread 1: requestlist max 0 avg 0 exceeded 0 jostled 0

                  System -> General  log:

                  dhcpleases: Could not deliver signal HUP to process because its pidfile (/var/run/unbound.pid) does not exist, No such process.

                  pfSense:
                  ASRock -> Wolfdale1333-D667 (2GB TeamElite Ram)
                  Marvell 88SA8040 Sata to CF(Sandisk 4GB) Controller
                  NIC's: RTL8100E (Internal ) and Intel® PRO/1000 PT Dual (Intel 82571GB)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P
                    phil.davis
                    last edited by

                    @cmb:

                    It'd be nice to have that back if you'd like to put in a pull request Phil. If not, it's not a big deal.

                    Yes, I will have a look. It should be just a copy-paste-search-replace operation to put the same functionality into the Resolver host override aliases case.
                    and yes, it was that easy, pull request: https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/pull/1344

                    As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
                    If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      stewgoin
                      last edited by

                      @mais_um:

                      Edit: Can't start Resolver with DHCP Registration (Register DHCP leases in the DNS Resolver) checked.

                      I'm seeing the same behavior this morning after updating to the latest snapshot. I turned off the DHCP registration stuff in DNS Resolver and it starts up just fine.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Raul RamosR
                        Raul Ramos
                        last edited by

                        Hi

                        Thu Nov 20 00:23:34 CST 2014 build i can enable DHCP Registration.

                        pfSense:
                        ASRock -> Wolfdale1333-D667 (2GB TeamElite Ram)
                        Marvell 88SA8040 Sata to CF(Sandisk 4GB) Controller
                        NIC's: RTL8100E (Internal ) and Intel® PRO/1000 PT Dual (Intel 82571GB)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • H
                          hiwi
                          last edited by

                          Today with build Fri Nov 21 01:58:53 CST 2014 I'm getting again 'fatal error: Could not read config file: /unbound.conf' with DHCP Registration checked.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • C
                            cmb
                            last edited by

                            @hiwi:

                            Today with build Fri Nov 21 01:58:53 CST 2014 I'm getting again 'fatal error: Could not read config file: /unbound.conf' with DHCP Registration checked.

                            Can't seem to replicate that. How is your Unbound configured?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • H
                              hiwi
                              last edited by

                              @cmb:

                              @hiwi:

                              Today with build Fri Nov 21 01:58:53 CST 2014 I'm getting again 'fatal error: Could not read config file: /unbound.conf' with DHCP Registration checked.

                              Can't seem to replicate that. How is your Unbound configured?

                              What information do you need?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • H
                                Hugovsky
                                last edited by

                                To me, it gives the error attached if I try to start resolver with "Register DHCP leases in the DNS Resolver" set.

                                2.2-BETA (amd64)
                                built on Fri Nov 21 08:16:06 CST 2014
                                FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE

                                system.jpg
                                system.jpg_thumb

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • H
                                  hiwi
                                  last edited by

                                  @cmb:

                                  @hiwi:

                                  Today with build Fri Nov 21 01:58:53 CST 2014 I'm getting again 'fatal error: Could not read config file: /unbound.conf' with DHCP Registration checked.

                                  Can't seem to replicate that. How is your Unbound configured?

                                  With version '2.2-BETA (amd64) built on Fri Nov 21 08:16:06 CST 2014' unbound started directly after upgrade. After another reboot it didn't start with DHCP Registration ('Register DHCP leases in the DNS Resolver') on.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • C
                                    cmb
                                    last edited by

                                    What's in your resolver log? Re: config, how are all the settings under Services>DNS Resolver configured?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • H
                                      hiwi
                                      last edited by

                                      resolver.log

                                      Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] fatal error: Could not read config file: /unbound.conf
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] info: ignored infra-lame-ttl: 900 (option removed, use infra-host-ttl)
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] notice: Restart of unbound 1.4.22.
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] debug: cache memory msg=66072 rrset=66072 infra=2600 val=66280
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] info: mesh has 0 recursion states (0 with reply, 0 detached), 0 waiting replies, 0 recursion replies sent, 0 replies dropped, 0 states jostled out
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] info: server stats for thread 1: requestlist max 0 avg 0 exceeded 0 jostled 0
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] info: server stats for thread 1: 0 queries, 0 answers from cache, 0 recursions, 0 prefetch
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] debug: cache memory msg=66072 rrset=66072 infra=2600 val=66280
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] info: mesh has 0 recursion states (0 with reply, 0 detached), 0 waiting replies, 0 recursion replies sent, 0 replies dropped, 0 states jostled out
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] info: server stats for thread 0: requestlist max 0 avg 0 exceeded 0 jostled 0
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] info: server stats for thread 0: 0 queries, 0 answers from cache, 0 recursions, 0 prefetch
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] info: service stopped (unbound 1.4.22).
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] debug: caught signal SIGHUP
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:1] debug: cache memory msg=66072 rrset=66072 infra=2600 val=66280
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] info: start of service (unbound 1.4.22).
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] debug: cache memory msg=66072 rrset=66072 infra=2600 val=66280
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] debug: target fetch policy for level 4 is 0
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] debug: target fetch policy for level 3 is 0
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] debug: target fetch policy for level 2 is 1
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] debug: target fetch policy for level 1 is 2
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] debug: target fetch policy for level 0 is 3
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] notice: init module 1: iterator
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] notice: init module 0: validator
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] debug: module config: "validator iterator"
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] debug: duplicate acl address ignored.
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] debug: drop user privileges, run as unbound
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] debug: chroot to /var/unbound
Nov 21 23:04:26	unbound: [6842:0] debug: chdir to /var/unbound
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] debug: switching log to stderr
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] debug: cache memory msg=66072 rrset=66072 infra=288782 val=149925
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: 1.000000 2.000000 7
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: 0.524288 1.000000 21
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: 0.262144 0.524288 62
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: 0.131072 0.262144 100
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: 0.065536 0.131072 50
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: 0.032768 0.065536 83
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: 0.016384 0.032768 176
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: 0.008192 0.016384 27
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: 0.004096 0.008192 1
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: 0.000000 0.000001 37
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: lower(secs) upper(secs) recursions
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: [25%]=0.0234589 median[50%]=0.0489546 [75%]=0.195297
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: histogram of recursion processing times
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: average recursion processing time 0.139959 sec
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: mesh has 0 recursion states (0 with reply, 0 detached), 0 waiting replies, 564 recursion replies sent, 0 replies dropped, 0 states jostled out
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: server stats for thread 1: requestlist max 14 avg 0.603774 exceeded 0 jostled 0
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: server stats for thread 1: 1688 queries, 1124 answers from cache, 564 recursions, 178 prefetch
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] debug: cache memory msg=66072 rrset=66072 infra=288782 val=149925
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: 1.000000 2.000000 1
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: 0.524288 1.000000 14
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: 0.262144 0.524288 30
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: 0.131072 0.262144 42
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: 0.065536 0.131072 28
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: 0.032768 0.065536 39
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: 0.016384 0.032768 52
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: 0.008192 0.016384 13
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: 0.004096 0.008192 1
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: 0.000000 0.000001 18
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: lower(secs) upper(secs) recursions
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: [25%]=0.0250486 median[50%]=0.0621752 [75%]=0.216893
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: histogram of recursion processing times
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: average recursion processing time 0.147787 sec
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: mesh has 0 recursion states (0 with reply, 0 detached), 0 waiting replies, 238 recursion replies sent, 0 replies dropped, 0 states jostled out
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: server stats for thread 0: requestlist max 40 avg 3.168 exceeded 0 jostled 0
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: server stats for thread 0: 548 queries, 310 answers from cache, 238 recursions, 12 prefetch
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] info: service stopped (unbound 1.4.22).
Nov 21 23:04:25	unbound: [87880:0] debug: caught signal SIGTERM
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] debug: cache memory msg=418824 rrset=714129 infra=288782 val=149925
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: validator operate: query cl4appf.com. A IN
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] debug: validator[module 0] operate: extstate:module_wait_module event:module_event_moddone
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: finishing processing for cl4appf.com. A IN
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: query response was ANSWER
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: reply from <cl4appf.com.> 78.140.168.56#53
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: response for cl4appf.com. A IN
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: sanitize: storing potential poison RRset: ns2.dcrmt.net. A IN
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: sanitize: storing potential poison RRset: ns1.dcrmt.net. A IN
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: iterator operate: query cl4appf.com. A IN
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] debug: iterator[module 1] operate: extstate:module_wait_reply event:module_event_reply
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] debug: cache memory msg=418824 rrset=714129 infra=288782 val=149925
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: Verified that unsigned response is INSECURE
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: validator operate: query cl4appf.com. AAAA IN
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] debug: validator[module 0] operate: extstate:module_wait_subquery event:module_event_pass
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: NSEC3s for the referral proved no DS.
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: validator operate: query cl4appf.com. DS IN
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] debug: validator[module 0] operate: extstate:module_wait_module event:module_event_moddone
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: finishing processing for cl4appf.com. DS IN
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: query response was nodata ANSWER
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: reply from <com.> 2001:503:a83e::2:30#53
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: response for cl4appf.com. DS IN
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: iterator operate: query cl4appf.com. DS IN
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] debug: iterator[module 1] operate: extstate:module_wait_reply event:module_event_reply
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] debug: cache memory msg=418824 rrset=714129 infra=288782 val=149925
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] debug: sending to target: <com.> 2001:503:a83e::2:30#53
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: sending query: cl4appf.com. DS IN
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: processQueryTargets: cl4appf.com. DS IN
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: resolving (init part 3): cl4appf.com. DS IN
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: resolving (init part 2): cl4appf.com. DS IN
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: resolving cl4appf.com. DS IN
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] debug: iterator[module 1] operate: extstate:module_state_initial event:module_event_pass
Nov 21 23:04:23	unbound: [87880:1] info: validator operate: query cl4appf.com. DS IN</com.></com.></cl4appf.com.>

                                      system.log

                                      Nov 21 23:04:26 zh01-rt02 dhcpleases: Could not deliver signal HUP to process because its pidfile (/var/run/unbound.pid) does not exist, No such process.
Nov 21 23:04:27 zh01-rt02 dhcpleases: Could not deliver signal HUP to process because its pidfile (/var/run/unbound.pid) does not exist, No such process.
Nov 21 23:04:29 zh01-rt02 dhcpleases: Could not deliver signal HUP to process because its pidfile (/var/run/unbound.pid) does not exist, No such process.
Nov 21 23:04:29 zh01-rt02 dhcpleases: kqueue error: unkown
Nov 21 23:04:29 zh01-rt02 dhcpleases: Could not deliver signal HUP to process because its pidfile (/var/run/unbound.pid) does not exist, No such process.

                                      Image with options is attached.

                                      ![Screenshot 2014-11-21 23.10.46.gif](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screenshot 2014-11-21 23.10.46.gif)
                                      ![Screenshot 2014-11-21 23.10.46.gif_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screenshot 2014-11-21 23.10.46.gif_thumb)

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • D
                                        DiskWizard
                                        last edited by

                                        2.2-BETA (amd64)
                                        built on Sat Nov 22 01:52:19 CST 2014
                                        FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE

                                        After today's upgrade Resolver "went to sleep", had to switch for DNS Forwarder.

                                        Oct 28 14:12:42 unbound: [23277:3] notice: sendto failed: No buffer space available

                                        I know, the date is wrong.

                                        1. GA-N3150M-D3P 8Gb RAM

                                        2. GA-C1037EN-EU 4GB RAM

                                        • 2,5 SATA III Solid State Drive SLIM S60
                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • C
                                          cmb
                                          last edited by

                                          @hiwi:

                                          Today with build Fri Nov 21 01:58:53 CST 2014 I'm getting again 'fatal error: Could not read config file: /unbound.conf' with DHCP Registration checked.

                                          That seems to be fixed after merging a pull request from wagonza yesterday. I found one system where I could replicate that, and after that change, I no longer could. There is a bug ticket on that issue. https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4036

                                          Others who could replicate that, are you seeing it on snapshots from the 23rd or newer?

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • H
                                            hiwi
                                            last edited by

                                            @cmb:

                                            That seems to be fixed after merging a pull request from wagonza yesterday. I found one system where I could replicate that, and after that change, I no longer could. There is a bug ticket on that issue. https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4036

                                            Others who could replicate that, are you seeing it on snapshots from the 23rd or newer?

                                            The latest snapshot I can get is 'Sat Nov 22 01:52:19 CST 2014'.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.