Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Wireless Support in pfSense

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Wireless
    15 Posts 9 Posters 4.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DerelictD
      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
      last edited by

      I hate to see precious resources being spent on integrating wireless cards into pfSense devices.

      Get a purpose-built access point and put it on your LAN, people.

      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        DoyleChris
        last edited by

        Well when a access point costs 20 to 50 dollars and i can get a wireless card for 10 dollars and integrate it.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          davros123
          last edited by

          @Derelict:

          I hate to see precious resources being spent on integrating wireless cards into pfSense devices.

          Get a purpose-built access point and put it on your LAN, people.

          What a short sighted attitude.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            Cino
            last edited by

            I can see both arguments. It really depends on your needs and box location. I prefer access points myself since they are built for the job.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • E
              Evanc9126
              last edited by

              Indeed, wireless is the most unreliable technology in networking today, but it is a necessary evil.  But for wireless+pfsense, one would prefer to have an internal card running as AP instead of an external device for aesthetic reasons.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P
                Paul47
                last edited by

                Also for bandwidth reasons - you might not want all that wireless traffic on your LAN (this of course depends on where your bottlenecks are, which can vary). However the OP solution, if it is the most trouble-free one, certainly makes a good backup solution, if nothing more exotic works.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  Guest
                  last edited by

                  How about captive portal and the graphing/logging/monitoring and security features. I think those features alone are a sell. Plus it is not like pfsense is supporting all wireless cards in AP mode. The concentration is on Atheros and i think that is great. I can pull one atheros radio out put another one in and my wifi settings remain untouched even with new mac on the radio. Awesome stuff i tell ya. Plus working N-mode now in Alpha releases I see less reasons for people to complain about shortcomings. Thank goodness for the Freebsd10 refresh i say… I also see alot of the driver related work done at the FreeBSD level -so where's the beef.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DerelictD
                    Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                    last edited by

                    You get all those things in pfSense if you have other wireless devices.

                    If you get a real WAP you can have 802.11ac yesterday, not be waiting for n in some weeks/months.

                    I just don't get it.

                    Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                    A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                    DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                    Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ?
                      Guest
                      last edited by

                      I feel there are many ways to approach a problem and none of them are wrong. I like the internal radio I installed in my Riverbed Steelhead. But I like internal things. You point is taken that all those features are available using an interface off pfsense. I just think that with pfSense being a monowall fork this basic function should exist. I hate to come across so blatant as a newbie but i created an account just to dispell this wireless voodoo i read all the time here. Folks -for 95 percent of the people wireless AP works fine. Just follow the hardware list.

                      What is the killer feature missing that these developers would be working on instead of wireless support??? pfSense Seems to be the most complete Router O/S i can find.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • N
                        neobauer
                        last edited by

                        @Evancool:

                        But for wireless+pfsense, one would prefer to have an internal card running as AP instead of an external device for aesthetic reasons.

                        Well said :)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • K
                          kejianshi
                          last edited by

                          Its a preference thing, obviously.  I have found using a DDWRT "router" as a wireless AP/dumb switch is both cost effective and reliable.  I prefer that for small normal home uses.

                          You can't beat getting a Gigabit switch + wireless AP for $10 which is about what I've paid every time.

                          DDWRT is starting to get long in the tooth though and not seeing much updates to it, so this may soon not be a good option.  Not sure.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DerelictD
                            Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                            last edited by

                            Right.  you're doing your wireless outside of pfSense where it belongs.

                            Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                            A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                            DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                            Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • K
                              kejianshi
                              last edited by

                              Well - Its just an opinion.
                              I have many and usually everyone disagrees.

                              The fact that you agree with me should worry you (-;

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DerelictD
                                Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                                last edited by

                                @Phishfry:

                                pfSense Seems to be the most complete Router O/S i can find.

                                Absolutely correct, until you mention "waiting for wireless n".

                                I have about 40 quality APs pumping through pfSense.  Works fantastic.  Hundreds if not thousands of simultaneous clients.  I also have 300 garbage APs pumping through pfSense.  Capping out at about 4000 captive portal sessions.  Works great.

                                Stop trying to get a wireless adapter working in your pfSense router.  It's a router.  Put your wireless at layer 2 where it belongs.  Let pfSense do what it does best - firewall router.

                                Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                                A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                                DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                                Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • N
                                  neobauer
                                  last edited by

                                  I agree also with you @Derelicht :)

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.