E2guardian package for pfsense - $??
-
first I want to say that no words are enough to thank marcelloc for his efforts,
what is the version of e2guardian you implement ?
I can compile the latest one v3.2 easily & start it in a freebsd 10.1 environment, but I can't create the pkg to try with pfsense… tell me if I can help../configure --enable-clamd --enable-avastd --enable-icap --enable-kavd --enable-sslmitm --enable-email --enable-trickledm --localstatedir=/var --with-logdir=/var/log --with-piddir=/var/run
-
I followed the above link: https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/pull/23
And there is a question of marcelloc which is answered by rbgarga and after that no more..Issues seemed to be: Packages will never be allowed to touch system files anymore. It's wrong and dangerous
-
I followed the above link: https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/pull/23
And there is a question of marcelloc which is answered by rbgarga and after that no more..Issues seemed to be: Packages will never be allowed to touch system files anymore. It's wrong and dangerous
https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense-packages/pull/866 is the pull request for E2guardian
-
I am a crap coder but I would be willing to try my hand at this if no one else will. The pfsense guys are top notch and have created a beautiful system but I need to provide a little filtering.
Can someone point me in the right direction on this to just get started?
-
Or I could just pitch money if someone else who knows what they are doing wants to pick this back up.
-
Can someone point me in the right direction on this to just get started?
I've got the BSD package working. I've just been playing with it in the hopes that the pfSense package will come soon. I am coming from Ubuntu server (and a strong Windows background) so some of the BSD structure isn't familiar to me, at this point I still have to start E2guardian up manually, haven't figured out how to get it to run at boot.
If you want to try installing the BSD package you can from the console with the following command:
pkg add http://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/release_3/All/e2guardian-3.0.4_1.txz
-
I'll give whatever else is needed, but I need this to work on all interfaces/vlans. In my environment, we have multiple vlans and subnets. Also need some type of DNS blocking option so we don't have to worry about the HTTPS cert errors. Just tell me the price.
-
Any news?
-
what seems to be the the issue here? Can someone with packaging knowledge pick this up?
-
Will this still be E2guardian 2.2 or will it be a later version? as they are up to version 3.2.0 now
For now, e2guardian 3.0.4
As of this date, what is the e2guardian version available for pfsense?
I need at least 3.1, for a working ssl_bump funtion
-
As of this date, what is the e2guardian version available for pfsense?
I need at least 3.1, for a working ssl_bump funtionThe current version in ports is 3.4.0.3, so if a package ever gets built, it will be at least that version.
-
As of this date, what is the e2guardian version available for pfsense?
I need at least 3.1, for a working ssl_bump funtionThe current version in ports is 3.4.0.3, so if a package ever gets built, it will be at least that version.
I tried to install e2g manually, but the pfsense repository does not have the application. Look for the application in pkg.freebsd.org but did not found the e2g version you are referring. Where do I get it?
-
You can install it manually, but I wouldn't suggest it. The way it stands now it's not all that stable. I would suggest (And it's what I did), installing E2Guardian on something like ubuntu then use nat to point all traffic at the second box running E2Guardian. Then E2Guardian can point all traffic back to the PFSense box and squid will proxy and send it on. Thats the most stabe way of setting up for now. It's not the best because configs are a pain, but it's more stable.
-
I tried to install e2g manually, but the pfsense repository does not have the application. Look for the application in pkg.freebsd.org but did not found the e2g version you are referring. Where do I get it?
pkg add http://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/latest/All/e2guardian-3.4.0.3.txz
This just installs the FreeBSD port, not the pfSense bits… -
You can install it manually, but I wouldn't suggest it. The way it stands now it's not all that stable. I would suggest (And it's what I did), installing E2Guardian on something like ubuntu then use nat to point all traffic at the second box running E2Guardian. Then E2Guardian can point all traffic back to the PFSense box and squid will proxy and send it on. Thats the most stabe way of setting up for now. It's not the best because configs are a pain, but it's more stable.
Can you send me a configuration file example for e2g, squid and NAT (screenshot) to follow your suggestion?
By the way the NAT is the one at Ubuntu or the one at pfsense (Newbie question) ? -
I tried to install e2g manually, but the pfsense repository does not have the application. Look for the application in pkg.freebsd.org but did not found the e2g version you are referring. Where do I get it?
pkg add http://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/latest/All/e2guardian-3.4.0.3.txz
This just installs the FreeBSD port, not the pfSense bits…Can I use this pkg to follow the manual installation procedure with Marcello codes?
-
Can I use this pkg to follow the manual installation procedure with Marcello codes?
You should be able to use the manual instructions from the 3.0.4 version, but I have not tried it. Let us know how it goes.
-
Can I use this pkg to follow the manual installation procedure with Marcello codes?
You should be able to use the manual instructions from the 3.0.4 version, but I have not tried it. Let us know how it goes.
Currently I am working with Captive Portal problems, but as soon as I try it, will post my findings here.
-
You can install it manually, but I wouldn't suggest it. The way it stands now it's not all that stable. I would suggest (And it's what I did), installing E2Guardian on something like ubuntu then use nat to point all traffic at the second box running E2Guardian. Then E2Guardian can point all traffic back to the PFSense box and squid will proxy and send it on. Thats the most stabe way of setting up for now. It's not the best because configs are a pain, but it's more stable.
Can you send me a configuration file example for e2g, squid and NAT (screenshot) to follow your suggestion?
By the way the NAT is the one at Ubuntu or the one at pfsense (Newbie question) ?I don't have all that together, but it's pretty easy to setup a nat on PFSense for all port 80 traffic to get routed to your E2Guardian box. Then you setup E2Guaridan to point at SquidProxy running on PFSense. The setup of E2Guardian can be found online fairly easily. All your doing with PFSense is funneling traffic through the E2Guadian box with NAT and then back out through Squid.
https://www.linux.com/learn/filter-content-your-home-network-e2guardian
Once you have E2Guardian installed
Edit ./etc/E2Guardian/E2Guardian.conf Change the Proxy IP and the Proxy port to match your PFSense Firewall and SquidProxy. After that it's just a matter of editing the configs for E2Guardian, which I admit is much harder than the PFSense plugin.
-
Is there any news on this? I'm more than happy to throw £20 at it - I really need content filtering on my network. I installed pfsense today primarily because I'd been told that dansguardian was a "one click install" only to discover that it isn't anymore…