Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Very unstable wifi on TL-WDN4800

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Wireless
    9 Posts 5 Posters 2.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      chemicstry
      last edited by

      Hello, I have set up pfsense as wifi AP with TL-WDN4800 card and I have very dodgy connection.

      All computer disconnect randomly, ping goes anywhere between 2ms and 2000ms (even to local address), takes a while to load a page.
      On android browser stucks for like 6 seconds and then almost instantly loads the page. Would look like a dns problem, but that would not explain ping and disconnection problems.

      Signal strength is good and there aren't much interference (my AP is red):

      I tried switching channels and even 5ghz range where I have 0 interference but I got the same problems.

      pfSense version:
      2.2-RELEASE (amd64)
      built on Thu Jan 22 14:03:54 CST 2015
      FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p4

      My current settings are as follows:
      Standard: 802.11ng (smae thing happens with na)
      802.11g OFDM Protection Mode: off (tried RTS and CTS)
      Transmit power: 99
      Channel: 6 (tried various channels and auto)
      Antenna settings: all default (I tried changing some of these but it didn't seem to make a difference)
      Regulatory settings: FCC, US, Default (also tried ETSI)
      Mode: Access Point
      SSID: TuRgElIs
      Enable WME: true (tried both)
      WPA: enabled with key
      WPA Mode: WPA2
      WPA Key Management Mode: Pre-Shared key
      Authentication: Open System Authentication
      WPA Pairwise: AES

      All other settings are default.

      Maybe this will help

      Does anyone see what I did wrong here? Or maybe could point me where to start diagnosing such problems.

      Also, is it possible to setup dual band wifi on both 2.4 ghz and 5 ghz range with single NIC? My NIC says that it's dual band but I don't know if that means that it can work on both bands simultaneously.

      Thank you.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • dotdashD
        dotdash
        last edited by

        First thing to do is to update to 2.2.1- the wireless drivers are more stable.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C
          chemicstry
          last edited by

          @dotdash:

          First thing to do is to update to 2.2.1- the wireless drivers are more stable.

          Just did it and I've got a strange crash after updating and it said something about ath interface so I sent the crash report. I haven't got any more crashes so far but the problem is still there  :(

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • dotdashD
            dotdash
            last edited by

            Might be worth it to try doing a fresh install and restoring the config.

            @chemicstry:

            Also, is it possible to setup dual band wifi on both 2.4 ghz and 5 ghz range with single NIC? My NIC says that it's dual band but I don't know if that means that it can work on both bands simultaneously.

            The card is dual band in that it can operate at 2.4 or 5Ghz. It doesn't have two radios.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              cmb
              last edited by

              First, yes, make sure you're on 2.2.1. The crash report could have been from before the upgrade and you just didn't notice it until afterwards (or it could have happened as it was rebooting post-upgrade still on the old kernel potentially).

              After upgrading, make sure your wireless config is acceptable by 2.2.1's input validation. Just go to Interfaces>(wireless interface name) and hit Save. If it doesn't kick back any errors you're fine. If it does, fix what it's rejecting so you end up with no errors after saving, then apply changes.

              If all that checks out, the only outstanding issue I'm aware of is some kind of problem with power save. It's not universal, and we haven't exactly tracked down the specific cause yet, but it seems to exhibit itself similarly to what you're describing. One device I've found problematic in general is Apple TV. Phones and tablets may cause similar issues, though my iPhone and iPad seem to work just fine.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DerelictD
                Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                last edited by

                CGATES-E0C84E should move to channel 11.

                The only channels available are 1, 6, and 11.  It is better to have two stations on 11 than one on 6 and one on 8.  That way they can demodulate each others traffic and work together as best as possible.  When you overlap like that they just look like noise to each other.

                If it were me I'd move to Channel 1 if I can't get that AP moved.

                Not that it will fix your issues.  Just sayin'.

                Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  Guest
                  last edited by

                  I also think the further you drift from the Atheros reference design the more problems you have.
                  Take a look at the HP-WPEA-113N. It is a Atheros AR5BXB92 reference design module and it works well. The best desktop adapter i have found infact.

                  https://wikidevi.com/wiki/Gemtek_WPEA-113N
                  Some come with u.fl instead of rp-sma so check your pictures on ebay.

                  TP-link is not the best choice for wireless adapters in my opinion. Been there and wasted my time.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • C
                    chemicstry
                    last edited by

                    @cmb:

                    First, yes, make sure you're on 2.2.1. The crash report could have been from before the upgrade and you just didn't notice it until afterwards (or it could have happened as it was rebooting post-upgrade still on the old kernel potentially).

                    After upgrading, make sure your wireless config is acceptable by 2.2.1's input validation. Just go to Interfaces>(wireless interface name) and hit Save. If it doesn't kick back any errors you're fine. If it does, fix what it's rejecting so you end up with no errors after saving, then apply changes.

                    If all that checks out, the only outstanding issue I'm aware of is some kind of problem with power save. It's not universal, and we haven't exactly tracked down the specific cause yet, but it seems to exhibit itself similarly to what you're describing. One device I've found problematic in general is Apple TV. Phones and tablets may cause similar issues, though my iPhone and iPad seem to work just fine.

                    I did everything you mentioned above and it didn't have any effect. The save didn't give any errors.
                    Is the power save issue only related to my card? If so, are there any cards that are 100% proven to work with pfsense and could make a decent AP? I'm looking for something in a consumer price range.

                    @Phishfry:

                    I also think the further you drift from the Atheros reference design the more problems you have.
                    Take a look at the HP-WPEA-113N. It is a Atheros AR5BXB92 reference design module and it works well. The best desktop adapter i have found infact.

                    https://wikidevi.com/wiki/Gemtek_WPEA-113N
                    Some come with u.fl instead of rp-sma so check your pictures on ebay.

                    TP-link is not the best choice for wireless adapters in my opinion. Been there and wasted my time.

                    Have you tested it with pfsense?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ?
                      Guest
                      last edited by

                      Have you tested it with pfsense?

                      Yes i have –posting with it right now as a matter of fact...

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.