Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Issue adding interfaces under ESXi

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Virtualization
    14 Posts 7 Posters 2.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F
      FauxShow
      last edited by

      I've had issues where the order of the interfaces was wrong after I added a few VMXNet3 adapters. It looked like nothing was working correctly at first, but it just didn't map the interfaces through in the correct order.

      brb; gotta reboot my pfsense

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • KOMK
        KOM
        last edited by

        I've never had any such problems with pfSense & ESXi, but I always add & configure in this order: WAN, LAN, OPT1, OPT2…

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
          last edited by

          I normally setup specific mac for my interfaces in esxi so I know for SURE which one is suppose to be which and not have to worry about order they come up, etc..

          I could prob get more creative in the numbers ;)  But this makes it real simple, so as long as someone else on my isp and on my same network gets the bright idea of using the same exact mac I won't have any issues with that 00:00:01 ;)  But then again im on 24/7/365 and its working.. So they are the ones that would have the problem if they tried to use that same mac.

          em0: flags=8843 <up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                  options=9b <rxcsum,txcsum,vlan_mtu,vlan_hwtagging,vlan_hwcsum>ether 00:50:56:00:00:01

          em1: flags=8843 <up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                  options=9b <rxcsum,txcsum,vlan_mtu,vlan_hwtagging,vlan_hwcsum>ether 00:50:56:00:00:02

          em2: flags=8843 <up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                  options=9b <rxcsum,txcsum,vlan_mtu,vlan_hwtagging,vlan_hwcsum>ether 00:50:56:00:00:03

          em3: flags=8843 <up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                  options=9b <rxcsum,txcsum,vlan_mtu,vlan_hwtagging,vlan_hwcsum>ether 00:50:56:00:00:04</rxcsum,txcsum,vlan_mtu,vlan_hwtagging,vlan_hwcsum></up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast></rxcsum,txcsum,vlan_mtu,vlan_hwtagging,vlan_hwcsum></up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast></rxcsum,txcsum,vlan_mtu,vlan_hwtagging,vlan_hwcsum></up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast></rxcsum,txcsum,vlan_mtu,vlan_hwtagging,vlan_hwcsum></up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • KOMK
            KOM
            last edited by

            I normally setup specific mac for my interfaces in esxi so I know for SURE which one is suppose to be which

            em0 = :01
            em1 = :02
            em2 = :03

            Clear as mud…  ;D

            Reminds me of when I was supporting optical jukebox software.  The developers in their wisdom decided to index the jukebox shelves starting at 1, but index the drives starting at 0.  So when you read an event log message saying that drive 2 had a problem with the media in shelf 34, you had to try and remember, was that really drive 2 shelf 34, or drive 2 shelf 35, or drive 3 shelf 34, or drive 3 shelf 35...

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
              last edited by

              Well you can not use 0 for a mac, not that I am aware of?  Maybe you could ;)

              Yeah interfaces always start at 0.. But its simple enough for me to look in esxi on which interface is on which vswitch, and then just easy numbers 1,2,3,4 to look at.

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • KOMK
                KOM
                last edited by

                Well you can not use 0 for a mac, not that I am aware of?

                Do I have to think of everything?  Obviously, the solution is to not have an em0…

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  MikeKulls
                  last edited by

                  Can't you use 00:00:00 for the last 6 digits?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • johnpozJ
                    johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                    last edited by

                    Maybe you can - will give it a try when get a chance.. That would make numbers match up.. How do not have a 0 interface though?  I don't think that is possible either.  Other than having one and not using it ;)

                    But could also just change to A,B,C and D for the last of the mac address - just need something that is very easy to see which one is which so can make sure pick the right one when setting up pfsense..

                    An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                    If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                    Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                    SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • KOMK
                      KOM
                      last edited by

                      How do not have a 0 interface though?  I don't think that is possible either.

                      It was a joke.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • L
                        l4k3k3m4n
                        last edited by

                        I have the same problem, when I add a new interface and reboot the order is mixed and I have to manually remap everything.
                        Is there a fix to this problem?

                        Another question:

                        Is it better to use multiple untagged interfaces in pfsense and do the VLAN separation on ESX vswitch ?
                        Or just use one trunked interface on ESX vswitch and create VLAN interfaces in pfsense?

                        Thanks.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • H
                          heper
                          last edited by

                          personally i just trunk it straight in the VM and play with vlans inside the VM.
                          no clue if there's any performance difference in doing the tagging/untagging on the esx level.

                          i find it easier to manage, by doing vlans in pfsense. This also solves the adding/removing interfaces "regulary'. (i don't add/remove physical/virtual interfaces a lot. i do regulary need more or less vlans)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            sebyp
                            last edited by

                            Hi there gents,

                            I'm experiencing the same issue here, after I'm adding a new "physical" (from pfSense's point of view) interface things go kaboom!

                            I've been thinking about using VLAN's as well, but my only question is: will it work on multiple hosts?

                            I have a pretty straight setup with two hosts, connected via switches. Of course, for inter-host communication I'm mapping the virtual networks to VLANS.

                            Is there a possibility to add "virtual dot1q tags" inside the actual virtual networks?

                            Thanks,
                            Sebastian

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.