Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Reverse Proxy whith SQUID3 (or whatever)

    Cache/Proxy
    3
    3
    1.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • L
      larrysys
      last edited by

      Hello everyone, I hope you can help me with a lab that I am doing to implement a reverse proxy with squid3 (or whatever).

      I Set up two WAMP servers behind the pfSense and want to reach for different domain names to publish these various sites by the same IP. No NAT.

      I hope to explain myself better with pictures of my diagram tests, to publish it in Spanish. An apology for if something does not sound consistent, I use google translator.
      postscript: I Remove the restriction defaul firewall to allow ip addresses class A, B, C for the WAN interface. If only I put fordward port works, but I need de qualities of a reverse proxy.
      Thank you very much to all.  :)

      Network Diagram of my lab
      http://www.subeimagenes.com/img/diagrama-de-red-laboratorio-1465442.html

      Reverse Proxy, General
      http://www.subeimagenes.com/img/reverse-proxy-general-settings-1465448.html

      WEb Servers
      http://www.subeimagenes.com/img/web-servers-1465449.html

      Mappings
      http://www.subeimagenes.com/img/mappings-1465451.html

      Mapping 1 config
      http://www.subeimagenes.com/img/mapping-1-1465453.html

      Mapping 1 config
      http://www.subeimagenes.com/img/mapping-2-1465456.html

      Firewall Rule, NO NAT, only accept 80 port
      http://www.subeimagenes.com/img/regla-de-firewall-1465491.html

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        chris4916
        last edited by

        Sorry, I didn't read yet links you provided but, to me, reverse proxy is better achieved relying on web server like mechanism rather than Squid mechanism.
        Reason, as far as I understand, is that Apache, Nginx or similar solution will offer more flexibility in term of URL rewriting and control and, furthermore, is will avoid to expose to internet your Squid proxy.

        This said, I'm going to look at your design details  ;D

        EDIT: now that I've looked at your design, could you please explain more in detail what doesn't work? This is not clear to me. What is the behaviour when you try to reach URL exposed by Squid?

        Jah Olela Wembo: Les mots se muent en maux quand ils indisposent, agressent ou blessent.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          sisko212
          last edited by

          Have you tried with haproxy ? You will find it on package manager.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.