• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

PfBlockerNG v2.0 w/DNSBL

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfBlockerNG
1.1k Posts 192 Posters 1.7m Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R
    RonpfS
    last edited by Dec 5, 2015, 11:38 PM Dec 5, 2015, 11:11 PM

    I read it  ;)

    However the suppression only seems to happen when you do a force reload, not when you click on the suppress icon

    IBlock_Badpeer       47283      47283      195706 
     Suppression IBlock_Ads: 50.31.164.0/24
     Suppression IBlock_Ads: 50.31.164.0/24
     Suppression IBlock_Ads: 50.31.164.0/24
     Suppression IBlock_Ads: 50.31.164.0/24
     Suppression IBlock_Ads: 50.31.164.0/24
    IBlock_Ads           3217       3211       195955   
    

    This take a few minutes to get online suppression results  :-\

    2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
    Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
    Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • B
      BBcan177 Moderator
      last edited by Dec 6, 2015, 7:20 PM

      @RonpfS:

      However the suppression only seems to happen when you do a force reload, not when you click on the suppress icon

      Check your pfBlockerNGSuppress alias and remove all of the single /32 addresses in 50.31.164.x and just use a single /24

      "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

      Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
      Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
      Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        Soloam
        last edited by Dec 7, 2015, 11:20 AM

        Hello all, I have my rules now allowing and not blocking, as we should do, I just have one question. Should I add a default reject all to the end of my LAN interfaces? Since I only allow, the traffic that does not match my allow rules will be blocked by default by pfsense, making my browser (for example) wait for a timeout (for example blocked IP's). If I add a reject all to the end of my rules, the request on the browser will be a lot faster, returning a rejected error.

        Thank you all

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          Jamerson
          last edited by Dec 7, 2015, 1:06 PM Dec 7, 2015, 12:55 PM

          Thank you so much for the great tools, it works great so far two weeks now no complains.
          i have a request, can we use the DNSBL to block Microsoft Telemtry ?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • H
            Hugovsky
            last edited by Dec 7, 2015, 7:00 PM

            http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/

            search near the bottom. There might be more lists out there.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • F
              f34rinc
              last edited by Dec 7, 2015, 8:51 PM

              @Jamerson:

              Thank you so much for the great tools, it works great so far two weeks now no complains.
              i have a request, can we use the DNSBL to block Microsoft Telemtry ?

              https://raw.githubusercontent.com/WindowsLies/BlockWindows/master/hostslist
              Taken from project - https://github.com/WindowsLies/BlockWindows

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                Jamerson
                last edited by Dec 7, 2015, 10:16 PM

                @f34rinc:

                @Jamerson:

                Thank you so much for the great tools, it works great so far two weeks now no complains.
                i have a request, can we use the DNSBL to block Microsoft Telemtry ?

                https://raw.githubusercontent.com/WindowsLies/BlockWindows/master/hostslist
                Taken from project - https://github.com/WindowsLies/BlockWindows

                those are domains, I have plenty of them :)
                can those be blocked using DNSBL ?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • F
                  f34rinc
                  last edited by Dec 8, 2015, 3:19 AM

                  @Jamerson:

                  can those be blocked using DNSBL ?

                  Yes it can

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • R
                    RonpfS
                    last edited by Dec 8, 2015, 8:02 AM

                    Is-it normal that during boot, Resolver start twice?

                    
                    Configuring WAN interface...done.
                    Configuring LAN interface...Starting DNS Resolver...done.
                    Starting DHCPv6 service...done.
                    done.
                    Configuring CARP settings...done.
                    Configuring OpenVPN settings...done.
                    Configuring firewall......done.
                    Starting PFLOG...done.
                    Setting up gateway monitors...done.
                    Synchronizing user settings...done.  
                    Starting webConfigurator...done.
                    Configuring CRON...done
                    Starting DNS resolver...done.
                    Starting NTP time client....done.
                    Starting DCHP service....done.
                    Starting DHCPv6 service...done.
                    Configuring firewall......done.
                    
                    

                    and when I access the Webconfigurator, resolver and ntp are both stopped.

                    I added Unbound under Service Watchdog and unbound start within 5 min of bootup.

                    Strange output from starting pfBlockerNG :

                    
                    Starting package pfBlockerNG...            ?done.
                    
                    

                    2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
                    Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
                    Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      Jamerson
                      last edited by Dec 8, 2015, 12:59 PM

                      @f34rinc:

                      @Jamerson:

                      can those be blocked using DNSBL ?

                      Yes it can

                      just post them on the block domain DNS feed ?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B
                        Bummer
                        last edited by Dec 8, 2015, 2:09 PM

                        Hey all!

                        This is just what the doctor ordered! Thans BBcan177, great job!

                        I have a dumb question. I was looking over the default settings and had a question about the below. If you're going to protect against spam, wouldn't you select "Inbound" as the default instead of "Outbound"? I want to prevent stuff from coming in to the network. I know I'm missing something here, just don't know what it is.

                        DNSBL IP Firewall Rule Settings:
                        Select Deny outbound or as per your requirements
                        select Enable logging

                        Thanks!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • H
                          Hugovsky
                          last edited by Dec 8, 2015, 3:43 PM

                          All connections are initiated from inside to outside direction, so, you should block what starts the connection. Unless you have open ports from the internet to your network.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • B
                            Bummer
                            last edited by Dec 8, 2015, 4:01 PM

                            Thanks for the replyl Hugovsky. But I'm still confused.

                            My mail server is inside my network and is clean. It would seem to me you'd want to block what is coming in from the outside to the ports opened on the mail server, etc.

                            Sorry, I can be dense at times.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • H
                              Hugovsky
                              last edited by Dec 8, 2015, 5:37 PM

                              Best way to do that is to make an alias and use it with the nat rule that forwards to your server. Remember: the firewall is already blocking everything you don't allow.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • B
                                BBcan177 Moderator
                                last edited by Dec 9, 2015, 2:07 AM

                                @Jamerson:

                                @f34rinc:

                                @Jamerson:

                                can those be blocked using DNSBL ?

                                Yes it can

                                just post them on the block domain DNS feed ?

                                You can add domains to the custom list at the bottom of any Alias, or create a new alias.

                                "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                                Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                                Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                                Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • B
                                  BBcan177 Moderator
                                  last edited by Dec 9, 2015, 2:09 AM

                                  @RonpfS:

                                  I added Unbound under Service Watchdog and unbound start within 5 min of bootup.

                                  Don't use Service Watchdog with DNSBL as that will interfere with how DNSBL updates.

                                  "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                                  Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                                  Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                                  Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • R
                                    RonpfS
                                    last edited by Dec 9, 2015, 4:59 AM Dec 9, 2015, 4:47 AM

                                    I tried to find out why unbound dies silently on bootup

                                    I did a fresh install, disabling all package before saving the config, bring the config back, normal pkg installation went smoothly.

                                    I enabled all packages except pfBlockerNG and DNSBL , rebooted 2-3 times and unbound is present on reboot.

                                    I enabled pfBlockerNG, DNSBL, on first reboot unbound was alive
                                    After 2-3 reboot it kept dying on reboot.
                                    Watching the services status, I could see it running until DNSBL start, then it dies.
                                    I went thru the /var/log files, no error is logged !

                                    Once it is started it keeps running fine.

                                    So I only put unbound in Service Watchdog, not DNSBL, is this ok?
                                    Now unbound restart 1 or 2 minutes after it dies.

                                    2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
                                    Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
                                    Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • B
                                      BBcan177 Moderator
                                      last edited by Dec 9, 2015, 5:00 AM Dec 9, 2015, 4:50 AM

                                      No don't use Service Watchguard for either.

                                      Do you have any of the Unbound DHCP registration checkboxes enabled? If so, disable those.

                                      "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                                      Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                                      Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                                      Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • R
                                        RonpfS
                                        last edited by Dec 9, 2015, 5:00 AM

                                        @BBcan177:

                                        No don't use Service Watchguard for either.

                                        So how do I find out what's making it dies on reboot ?

                                        2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
                                        Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
                                        Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • R
                                          RonpfS
                                          last edited by Dec 9, 2015, 5:07 AM

                                          @BBcan177:

                                          Do you have any of the Unbound DHCP registration checkboxes enabled? If so, disable those.

                                          Nope only Enable DNSSEC Support is ticked.
                                          Network interface is set to ALL
                                          Outgoing interface is set to WAN

                                          I do have Host Overrides for a local domain (not the local domain of pfense), including the WAN IP of the firewal (it is behind my present pfsense box)

                                          2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
                                          Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
                                          Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          199 out of 1077
                                          • First post
                                            199/1077
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                                            This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                                            consent.not_received