Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    The url_rewriter helpers are crashing too rapidly

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Cache/Proxy
    7 Posts 4 Posters 1.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      paulmccherry
      last edited by

      The IT engineer that installed the Linux box and PFsense has gone incommunicado and left me to pick up the pieces. I have Linux, firewall and comms experience but do not know Pfsense.

      The system has been working fine up till today howerver many websites cannot now be accessed from the LAN, just a error white page appearing. Another interface that has a wireless access point connected is working fine via laptops.

      A message in the logs says The url_rewriter helpers are crashing too rapidly

      Do I need to reinstall Squid or Squidguard, if so how or is their something else I can configure ?

      Any help is greatly appreciated.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • KOMK
        KOM
        last edited by

        I have Linux, firewall and comms experience but do not know Pfsense.

        pfSense is based on FreeBSD, so some of your Linux skills will transfer over.

        The url_rewriter helpers are crashing too rapidly

        The URL rewriter is squidGuard.  You need to figure out why it's barfing.  Anything in /var/squidGuard/log/squidGuard.log?

        This post should be in the Cache/Proxy forum.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          doktornotor Banned
          last edited by

          I'm pretty sure it's barfing because noone reads the post-install info/GUI instructions on setting up the dummy category… Sigh.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • KOMK
            KOM
            last edited by

            Is this something that can be scripted on install to prevent people from tripping over it again and again?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              doktornotor Banned
              last edited by

              No, because noone reported what it actually fixes where. All I got here was "it creates some unknown missing folder".

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A
                aGeekhere
                last edited by

                noone reported what it actually fixes

                Was it "Shared object "libldap-2.4.so.2" not found, required by "squidGuard" a missing softlink?

                Never Fear, A Geek is Here!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  doktornotor Banned
                  last edited by

                  There shouldn't be any softlink to that anywhere (and for sure isn't created by adding a dummy target category). As said, it just doesn't make sense.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.