Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    OpenVPN Issue – [Resolved 4 Apr 16]

    2.3-RC Snapshot Feedback and Issues - ARCHIVED
    6
    11
    3.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      jits
      last edited by

      **  Resolved in .. VPN / OpenVPN / Client Specific Overrides.

      ** /30 addressing removed and replaced with /24 address.
      ** Example : removed 10.192.168.12/30 and replaced with 10.192.168.12/24.

      ** Logs now show…

      Mon Apr 04 22:47:19 2016 TAP-WIN32 device [Ethernet 2] opened: \\.\Global\{535AE7AA-F3DF-4F97-BDD8-E88CDD18FA4A}.tap
      Mon Apr 04 22:47:19 2016 Set TAP-Windows TUN subnet mode network/local/netmask = 10.192.168.0/10.192.168.12/255.255.255.0 [SUCCEEDED]
      Mon Apr 04 22:47:19 2016 Notified TAP-Windows driver to set a DHCP IP/netmask of 10.192.168.12/255.255.255.0 on interface {535AE7AA-F3DF-4F97-BDD8-E88CDD18FA4A} [DHCP-serv: 10.192.168.254, lease-time: 31536000]
      Mon Apr 04 22:47:19 2016 Successful ARP Flush on interface [11] {535AE7AA-F3DF-4F97-BDD8-E88CDD18FA4A}
      Mon Apr 04 22:47:20 2016 Initialization Sequence Completed
      
      

      Hello.

      I am running latest and greatest…community edition.

      2.3-RC (amd64)
      built on Mon Apr 04 07:32:16 CDT 2016
      FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE

      Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU D510 @ 1.66GHz
      4 CPUs: 1 package(s) x 2 core(s) x 2 HTT threads

      I do have a problem with OpenVPN clients who can connect into the VPN, but are unable to communicate further. Anyone else having this problem?

      Jits.

      OpenVPN clients

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        cremesk
        last edited by

        for me help's a reboot..

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • O
          Ofloo
          last edited by

          What do you mean by further?

          • Add allow rule to the firewall?
          • If it's to the web NAT rules?
          • other IP routes, did you properly advertise the IP routes the router has to the client?
          • …

          Please explain closer, there's several things I can understand from your question, all with different solutions.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • johnpozJ
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
            last edited by

            so did this use to work and after the upgrade to this snapshot it failed.. Or is this a new setup?

            What I can tell you is I am using CE

            2.3-RC (amd64)
            built on Sun Apr 03 14:24:26 CDT 2016

            And I am currently remote oopenvpn in and not having any issues getting to anything.  I don't really like upgrading while I am gone to a new snapshot.. If something happens to fail, I am kind of locked out and wife would be pissed no internet until I get home sort of thing ;)

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              serialdie
              last edited by

              no issues here.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                jits
                last edited by

                my apologies…

                It's Monday.

                This is an upgrade from 2.2.6 version. I've rebooted and then thought that perhaps I need to resend the client files to the users after the upgrade. That made sense to me. I resent to myself, and on the client side, when logging in this is what I get...

                Mon Apr 04 14:19:22 2016 OpenVPN 2.3.7 x86_64-w64-mingw32 [SSL (OpenSSL)] [LZO] [PKCS11] [IPv6] built on Jun  8 2015
                Mon Apr 04 14:19:22 2016 library versions: OpenSSL 1.0.1m 19 Mar 2015, LZO 2.08
                Enter Management Password:
                Mon Apr 04 14:19:23 2016 Control Channel Authentication: using 'gateway-luna-udp-3396-Paperlips-tls.key' as a OpenVPN static key file
                Mon Apr 04 14:19:23 2016 UDPv4 link local (bound): [undef]
                Mon Apr 04 14:19:23 2016 UDPv4 link remote: [AF_INET]X.X.106.2:3396
                Mon Apr 04 14:19:24 2016 [GPOServer] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]X.X.106.2:3396
                Mon Apr 04 14:19:26 2016 do_ifconfig, tt->ipv6=0, tt->did_ifconfig_ipv6_setup=0
                Mon Apr 04 14:19:26 2016 open_tun, tt->ipv6=0
                Mon Apr 04 14:19:26 2016 TAP-WIN32 device [Ethernet 2] opened: \\.\Global\{C4F2E093-407F-483C-BBAC-0A1AD555208A}.tap
                Mon Apr 04 14:19:26 2016 Set TAP-Windows TUN subnet mode network/local/netmask = 10.192.168.12/10.192.168.12/255.255.255.252 [SUCCEEDED]
                Mon Apr 04 14:19:26 2016 Notified TAP-Windows driver to set a DHCP IP/netmask of 10.192.168.12/255.255.255.252 on interface {C4F2E093-407F-483C-BBAC-0A1AD555208A} [DHCP-serv: 10.192.168.14, lease-time: 31536000]
                Mon Apr 04 14:19:26 2016 Successful ARP Flush on interface [13] {C4F2E093-407F-483C-BBAC-0A1AD555208A}
                Mon Apr 04 14:19:57 2016 SIGTERM[hard,] received, process exiting
                
                

                And..on the server side, this is what I get…

                Apr 4 14:21:54 	openvpn 	32873 	Paperlips/192.168.1.177:52769 [Paperlips] Inactivity timeout (--ping-restart), restarting
                Apr 4 14:19:23 	openvpn 	32873 	Paperlips/192.168.1.177:52769 send_push_reply(): safe_cap=940
                Apr 4 14:19:21 	openvpn 	32873 	192.168.1.177:52769 [Paperlips] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]192.168.1.177:52769 
                

                Logs recorded from 02 APR…

                
                Apr 4 14:21:54 	openvpn 	32873 	Paperlips/192.168.1.177:52769 [Paperlips] Inactivity timeout (--ping-restart), restarting
                Apr 4 14:19:23 	openvpn 	32873 	Paperlips/192.168.1.177:52769 send_push_reply(): safe_cap=940
                Apr 4 14:19:21 	openvpn 	32873 	192.168.1.177:52769 [Paperlips] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]192.168.1.177:52769
                Apr 4 14:18:55 	openvpn 	32873 	x.x.132.52:63855 send_push_reply(): safe_cap=940
                Apr 4 14:18:54 	openvpn 	32873 	x.x.167.158:60368 send_push_reply(): safe_cap=940
                Apr 4 14:18:52 	openvpn 	32873 	x.x.132.52:63855 [C] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]x.x.132.52:63855
                Apr 4 14:18:52 	openvpn 	32873 	x.x.96.41:50427 send_push_reply(): safe_cap=940
                Apr 4 14:18:52 	openvpn 	32873 	x.x.167.158:60368 [C] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]x.x.167.158:60368
                Apr 4 14:18:50 	openvpn 	32873 	x.x.96.41:50427 MULTI_sva: pool returned IPv4=10.192.168.2, IPv6=(Not enabled)
                Apr 4 14:18:50 	openvpn 	32873 	x.x.96.41:50427 [car] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]x.x.96.41:50427
                Apr 4 14:18:44 	openvpn 	32873 	x.x.167.158:60368 write UDPv4: No route to host (code=65)
                Apr 4 14:18:44 	openvpn 	32873 	x.x.132.52:63855 write UDPv4: No route to host (code=65)
                Apr 4 14:18:44 	openvpn 	32873 	x.x.96.41:50427 write UDPv4: No route to host (code=65)
                Apr 4 14:18:42 	openvpn 	32873 	x.x.167.158:60368 write UDPv4: No route to host (code=65)
                Apr 4 14:18:41 	openvpn 	32873 	x.x.96.41:50427 write UDPv4: No route to host (code=65)
                Apr 4 14:18:40 	openvpn 	32873 	x.x.167.158:60368 write UDPv4: No route to host (code=65)
                Apr 4 14:18:33 	openvpn 	32873 	Initialization Sequence Completed
                Apr 4 14:18:33 	openvpn 	32873 	UDPv4 link remote: [undef]
                Apr 4 14:18:33 	openvpn 	32873 	UDPv4 link local (bound): [AF_INET]x.x.106.2:3396
                Apr 4 14:18:33 	openvpn 	32873 	/usr/local/sbin/ovpn-linkup ovpns2 1500 1602 10.192.168.1 255.255.255.0 init
                Apr 4 14:18:33 	openvpn 	32873 	/sbin/ifconfig ovpns2 10.192.168.1 10.192.168.2 mtu 1500 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
                Apr 4 14:18:33 	openvpn 	32873 	do_ifconfig, tt->ipv6=0, tt->did_ifconfig_ipv6_setup=0
                Apr 4 14:18:33 	openvpn 	32873 	ioctl(TUNSIFMODE): Device busy: Device busy (errno=16)
                Apr 4 14:18:33 	openvpn 	32873 	TUN/TAP device /dev/tun2 opened
                Apr 4 14:18:33 	openvpn 	32873 	TUN/TAP device ovpns2 exists previously, keep at program end
                Apr 4 14:18:33 	openvpn 	32873 	Control Channel Authentication: using '/var/etc/openvpn/server2.tls-auth' as a OpenVPN static key file
                Apr 4 14:18:33 	openvpn 	32873 	NOTE: the current --script-security setting may allow this configuration to call user-defined scripts
                Apr 4 14:18:33 	openvpn 	32873 	Could not retrieve default gateway from route socket:: No such process (errno=3)
                Apr 4 14:18:33 	openvpn 	32553 	library versions: OpenSSL 1.0.1s-freebsd 1 Mar 2016, LZO 2.09
                Apr 4 14:18:33 	openvpn 	32553 	OpenVPN 2.3.9 amd64-portbld-freebsd10.3 [SSL (OpenSSL)] [LZO] [MH] [IPv6] built on Mar 31 2016
                Apr 4 14:13:22 	openvpn 	31123 	S/x.x.82.18:53174 [s] Inactivity timeout (--ping-restart), restarting
                Apr 4 14:11:22 	openvpn 	31123 	S/x.x.82.18:53174 send_push_reply(): safe_cap=940
                Apr 4 14:11:20 	openvpn 	31123 	x.x.82.18:53174 [s] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]x.x.82.18:53174
                Apr 4 14:10:54 	openvpn 	31123 	S/x.x.82.18:42576 send_push_reply(): safe_cap=940
                Apr 4 14:10:52 	openvpn 	31123 	x.x.82.18:42576 [s] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]x.x.82.18:42576
                Apr 4 13:41:26 	openvpn 	31123 	S/x.x.82.18:15892 [s] Inactivity timeout (--ping-restart), restarting
                Apr 4 13:39:26 	openvpn 	31123 	S/x.x.82.18:15892 send_push_reply(): safe_cap=940
                Apr 4 13:39:24 	openvpn 	31123 	x.x.82.18:15892 [s] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]x.x.82.18:15892
                Apr 4 13:38:49 	openvpn 	31123 	S/x.x.82.18:55188 send_push_reply(): safe_cap=940
                Apr 4 13:38:47 	openvpn 	31123 	x.x.82.18:55188 [s] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]x.x.82.18:55188
                Apr 4 13:24:11 	openvpn 	31123 	Paperlips/x.x.96.41:40544 [Paperlips] Inactivity timeout (--ping-restart), restarting
                Apr 4 13:13:05 	openvpn 	31123 	S/192.168.90.46:63234 [Sacha] Inactivity timeout (--ping-restart), restarting
                Apr 4 13:07:08 	openvpn 	31123 	Paperlips/x.x.96.41:40544 send_push_reply(): safe_cap=940
                Apr 4 13:07:06 	openvpn 	31123 	x.x.96.41:40544 [PaperClips] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]x.x.96.41:40544
                Apr 4 12:55:22 	openvpn 	31123 	S/192.168.90.46:63234 send_push_reply(): safe_cap=940
                Apr 4 12:55:20 	openvpn 	31123 	S/192.168.90.46:63234 MULTI_sva: pool returned IPv4=10.192.168.3, IPv6=(Not enabled)
                Apr 4 12:55:20 	openvpn 	31123 	192.168.90.46:63234 [s] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]192.168.90.46:63234
                Apr 4 12:31:06 	openvpn 	31123 	Sacha/192.168.90.46:57861 [s] Inactivity timeout (--ping-restart), restarting
                Apr 4 11:49:20 	openvpn 	31123 	C/x.x.132.52:52432 send_push_reply(): safe_cap=940
                Apr 4 11:49:18 	openvpn 	31123 	x.x.132.52:52432 [C] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]x.x.132.52:52432
                Apr 4 11:46:41 	openvpn 	31123 	Paperlips/x.x.96.41:53734 [Paperlips] Inactivity timeout (--ping-restart), restarting
                Apr 4 11:40:01 	openvpn 	31123 	Paperlips/x.x.96.41:53734 send_push_reply(): safe_cap=940
                Apr 4 11:39:58 	openvpn 	31123 	x.x.96.41:53734 [Paperlips] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]x.x.96.41:53734
                Apr 4 11:11:13 	openvpn 	31123 	Sacha/192.168.90.46:57861 send_push_reply(): safe_cap=940
                Apr 4 11:11:10 	openvpn 	31123 	Sacha/192.168.90.46:57861 MULTI_sva: pool returned IPv4=10.192.168.3, IPv6=(Not enabled)
                Apr 4 11:11:10 	openvpn 	31123 	192.168.90.46:57861 [s] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]192.168.90.46:57861
                Apr 4 10:18:00 	openvpn 	31123 	C/x.x.167.158:50190 send_push_reply(): safe_cap=940
                Apr 4 10:18:00 	openvpn 	31123 	C/x.x.132.52:55873 send_push_reply(): safe_cap=940
                Apr 4 10:17:58 	openvpn 	31123 	carletta/x.x.96.41:35123 send_push_reply(): safe_cap=940
                Apr 4 10:17:58 	openvpn 	31123 	x.x.132.52:55873 [C] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]x.x.132.52:55873
                Apr 4 10:17:58 	openvpn 	31123 	x.x.167.158:50190 [C] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]5.189.167.158:50190
                Apr 4 10:17:55 	openvpn 	31123 	carletta/x.x.96.41:35123 MULTI_sva: pool returned IPv4=10.192.168.2, IPv6=(Not enabled)
                Apr 4 10:17:55 	openvpn 	31123 	209.59.96.41:35123 [c] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]x.x.96.41:35123
                [/s][/s][/s][/s][/s][/s][/s][/s][/s]
                
                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                  last edited by

                  why would you have to send anything??  I just upgraded my 2.2.6 to 2.3 couple days back and openvpn working with exact same files.  Why would the config files change?  The certs sure wouldn't of..

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    serialdie
                    last edited by

                    @johnpoz:

                    why would you have to send anything??  I just upgraded my 2.2.6 to 2.3 couple days back and openvpn working with exact same files.  Why would the config files change?  The certs sure wouldn't of..

                    +1 This.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      jits
                      last edited by

                      Correct. There are no changes made to the certs, so no need to re-issue them.

                      I left openvpn connecting and after a while, this is the error..

                      Mon Apr 04 17:21:25 2016 Warning: route gateway is not reachable on any active network adapters: 10.192.168.1

                      Why would this be?

                      Thanks…

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        cmb
                        last edited by

                        Your client's receiving a /30, so yeah .1 isn't going to be reachable. What's your server-side OpenVPN config look like, primarily for DHCP?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • J
                          jits
                          last edited by

                          @cmb:

                          Your client's receiving a /30, so yeah .1 isn't going to be reachable. What's your server-side OpenVPN config look like, primarily for DHCP?

                          I will check to make sure when I reach back, but I think it is a mixture. Remote users log in and get assigned whatever IP address within subnet.

                          Other users, Remote Agents are assigned specific IP addresses within the same subnet. This because we build VM's for them to use billing software remotely, and print customer receipts locally. Within the VMs we use the NETUSE LPT1 to assign USB receipt printer back at their location.

                          This used to work before the upgrade to 2.3. Hope this help. Is there any further information I should provide?

                          Thanks…

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.