Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Feedback on potential Gigabit build using C2758

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    30 Posts 11 Posters 5.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G
      geesu
      last edited by

      I've been looking around for a lower power pfSense build which will also be performant enough to give me full WAN gigabit usage (not PPPoE). Today I'm using a Q9300 which gives me full use but on idle it uses is 115 - 130 W, which is terrible.

      I have Cincinnati Bell Fioptics which today is giving me roughly 980 down and 250 up. (I pay for 1000/250)

      Here is what I'm thinking:

      Motherboard: SUPERMICRO MBD-A1SRi-2758F ($340)
      Processor: Atom C2758 (embedded in the above mobo)
      Case: Supermicro Superchassis Cse-504-203B 200W  1U ($100)
      8GB ECC RAM: Kingston 8GB 204-Pin DDR3 SO-DIMM ECC ($47)

      These brings me to just shy of $500: $486.97.

      I was going to use a 128GB SSD I have sitting around the house.

      Anyone have any suggestions? See any potential issues?

      And FYI I was inspired by this great thread.

      Thanks in advance!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        Guest
        last edited by

        I would try out 2 x 4 GB ECC or 2 x 8 GB ECC pending on the dual channel mostly and only marginal higher price.

        • Enable TRIM support for the SSD
          How to enable TRIM support on pfSense

        • high up the mbuf size to 1000000
          available on 8 GB and for sure at 16 GB

        • please ensure that the SSD is supporting TRIM

        • please give us an information on your WAN throughput without PPPoE please!

        • for a nice set up I would be trying at first version 2.2.6 (64Bit) VGA image and do a fresh and full install

        • version 2.3.1 (64Bit) could also be tried out but if it produces perhapx failures its better for a more stable set up

        Have fun its a great platform as many others reported back.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • E
          edwardwong
          last edited by

          @geesu:

          I've been looking around for a lower power pfSense build which will also be performant enough to give me full WAN gigabit usage (not PPPoE). Today I'm using a Q9300 which gives me full use but on idle it uses is 115 - 130 W, which is terrible.

          I have Cincinnati Bell Fioptics which today is giving me roughly 980 down and 250 up. (I pay for 1000/250)

          Here is what I'm thinking:

          Motherboard: SUPERMICRO MBD-A1SRi-2758F ($340)
          Processor: Atom C2758 (embedded in the above mobo)
          Case: Supermicro Superchassis Cse-504-203B 200W  1U ($100)
          8GB ECC RAM: Kingston 8GB 204-Pin DDR3 SO-DIMM ECC ($47)

          These brings me to just shy of $500: $486.97.

          I was going to use a 128GB SSD I have sitting around the house.

          Anyone have any suggestions? See any potential issues?

          And FYI I was inspired by this great thread.

          Thanks in advance!

          It's more than enough already, I don't see any issue, maybe you can save some money and go for C2358 which is even lower TDP.
          Not sure you need features from full install or not (like HAVP), if not I guess you can save the 128G SSD for other purposes and use USB stick to boot.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            damir
            last edited by

            I am looking into new box for Gigabit which i am getting installed on Friday.

            so, this Atom is powerful enough to handle this speed?

            Is there any other (smaller) Case you guys would recommend for this mobo?

            Thanks

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              Guest
              last edited by

              @NEK4TE

              I am looking into new box for Gigabit which i am getting installed on Friday.

              Over PPPoE or FTTH/FTTC without PPPoE?
              Together with a static IP address or a dynamic one?

              so, this Atom is powerful enough to handle this speed?

              What do you need really? If your Internet connection is based on using PPPoE only one cpu core will be running
              at the WAN interface. And I really think this will be not really delivering 1 GBit/s but if you are not using PPPoE
              it could really be that then 1 GBit/s will be delivered.

              Is there any other (smaller) Case you guys would recommend for this mobo?

              This is also pending on many more circumstances as only one!

              • Installed packets
              • running services
              • offered options in the entire network
              • The entire amount of users that are using that network
              • Real offered WAN speed (real GB or only nearly GB Internet connection speed)
              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                dgall
                last edited by

                If the SUPERMICRO MBD-A1SRi-2758F motherboard will fit in the M350 I may go the route

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • MikeV7896M
                  MikeV7896
                  last edited by

                  The mini-box M350 case works with the A1SRi-2558F motherboard, so I would imagine it would work with the 2758 version too.

                  The S in IOT stands for Security

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JailerJ
                    Jailer
                    last edited by

                    @virgiliomi:

                    The mini-box M350 case works with the A1SRi-2558F motherboard, so I would imagine it would work with the 2758 version too.

                    Physically yes but you may need to add a fan to aid in cooling from the increased heat output of the 8 core CPU on the 2758.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • MikeV7896M
                      MikeV7896
                      last edited by

                      @Jailer:

                      @virgiliomi:

                      The mini-box M350 case works with the A1SRi-2558F motherboard, so I would imagine it would work with the 2758 version too.

                      Physically yes but you may need to add a fan to aid in cooling from the increased heat output of the 8 core CPU on the 2758.

                      Which is very much possible. If a SATA-DOM SSD or USB storage will be used, then you can use the included bracket to mount a fan (or two) to. If you'll be using a 2.5" SSD or hard drive, then a second bracket can be ordered to mount the fan(s) to.

                      The S in IOT stands for Security

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A
                        AR15USR
                        last edited by

                        I just built exactly this recently. An A1SRi-2758 in a M350 case. Works perfect.

                        Here's what I used:
                        SuperMicro A1SRi-2758
                        16gb Ram (2x8gb sticks)
                        Samsung EVO 850 120gb SSD
                        +1 Hard Drive Bracket
                        2x Evercool 40mm fans

                        I started out without the fans, but it got past the published operating range of the board, so I added them. Huge difference, now runs at a constant 18-21c and is not very loud at all. For the case I went with the M-350 that includes the power source from the get go, I didn't feel like mucking around with finding one. Only thing I don't like about the case is no LEDs, but thats a personal pref. I'm going to eventually migrate it to a 1U case because I am going that route with all my equipment anyhow..


                        2.6.0-RELEASE

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • D
                          damir
                          last edited by

                          @BlueKobold:

                          @NEK4TE

                          I am looking into new box for Gigabit which i am getting installed on Friday.

                          Over PPPoE or FTTH/FTTC without PPPoE?
                          Together with a static IP address or a dynamic one?

                          so, this Atom is powerful enough to handle this speed?

                          What do you need really? If your Internet connection is based on using PPPoE only one cpu core will be running
                          at the WAN interface. And I really think this will be not really delivering 1 GBit/s but if you are not using PPPoE
                          it could really be that then 1 GBit/s will be delivered.

                          Is there any other (smaller) Case you guys would recommend for this mobo?

                          This is also pending on many more circumstances as only one!

                          • Installed packets
                          • running services
                          • offered options in the entire network
                          • The entire amount of users that are using that network
                          • Real offered WAN speed (real GB or only nearly GB Internet connection speed)

                          Service i am getting is Cable, Gigabit (download) and 50mbit (upload).

                          Right now, i only have iperf/service watch dog installed on my pfSense which is running on Core2Duo CPU E7200 @ 2.53GHz.

                          I expect to see around 950-970mbit actually ( i think ) from this service.

                          Not sure if my Core2Duo will be able to handle it, that is why i am already looking into different option.

                          Thanks

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • T
                            trumee
                            last edited by

                            @AR15USR:

                            I just built exactly this recently. An A1SRi-2758 in a M350 case. Works perfect.

                            Here's what I used:
                            SuperMicro A1SRi-2758
                            16gb Ram (2x8gb sticks)
                            Samsung EVO 850 120gb SSD
                            +1 Hard Drive Bracket
                            2x Evercool 40mm fans

                            I started out without the fans, but it got past the published operating range of the board, so I added them. Huge difference, now runs at a constant 18-21c and is not very loud at all. For the case I went with the M-350 that includes the power source from the get go, I didn't feel like mucking around with finding one. Only thing I don't like about the case is no LEDs, but thats a personal pref. I'm going to eventually migrate it to a 1U case because I am going that route with all my equipment anyhow..

                            I have a similar setup as yours. What 1U chassis are you planning to use? I havent migrated over yet because i think it maybe too noisy.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • A
                              AR15USR
                              last edited by

                              @trumee:

                              @AR15USR:

                              I just built exactly this recently. An A1SRi-2758 in a M350 case. Works perfect.

                              Here's what I used:
                              SuperMicro A1SRi-2758
                              16gb Ram (2x8gb sticks)
                              Samsung EVO 850 120gb SSD
                              +1 Hard Drive Bracket
                              2x Evercool 40mm fans

                              I started out without the fans, but it got past the published operating range of the board, so I added them. Huge difference, now runs at a constant 18-21c and is not very loud at all. For the case I went with the M-350 that includes the power source from the get go, I didn't feel like mucking around with finding one. Only thing I don't like about the case is no LEDs, but thats a personal pref. I'm going to eventually migrate it to a 1U case because I am going that route with all my equipment anyhow..

                              I have a similar setup as yours. What 1U chassis are you planning to use? I havent migrated over yet because i think it maybe too noisy.

                              Haven't really researched it yet, but maybe SuperMicro's 505: https://www.supermicro.com/products/chassis/1u/505/sc505-203.cfm. Looks pretty well ventilated..


                              2.6.0-RELEASE

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • D
                                damir
                                last edited by

                                That case comes with PSU unit, right? nothing else is needed regarding power for this mobo?

                                so, it would be this case + that mobo + ram + disk, done? no custom parts / custom power setup, etc?

                                thnx!

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • ?
                                  Guest
                                  last edited by

                                  Right now, i only have iperf/service watch dog installed on my pfSense which is running on Core2Duo CPU E7200 @ 2.53GHz.

                                  Then try it out based on that hardware and if you are not able to archive that needed throughput you are able
                                  to still change it against any other hardware.

                                  I expect to see around 950-970mbit actually ( i think ) from this service.

                                  From 1 GBit/s often or the most users will be able to see 940 MBit/s - 950 MBit/s, but it is a full GBit/s!
                                  Because the TCP/IP overhead must be count on top of this and then the time that is needed for working
                                  over or processing the NAT and firewall rules.

                                  Not sure if my Core2Duo will be able to handle it, that is why i am already looking into different option.

                                  A Intel Core i3 or i5 will do it for you; this would be the edge tech. specs. for what I would looking out for.

                                  • @3.0GHz (core frequ. or turbo)
                                  • 4 Core
                                  • AES-NI

                                  One good board that will be supporting many different CPUs are this two ones here:
                                  – ASUS Q87T
                                  -- Gigabyte Q87TN

                                  • 16 GB RAM
                                  • mini-ITX format
                                  • real PCIe 2.0 x4 slot for add on NICs (single, dual or quad port)
                                  • one mSATA (full) miniPCIe slot and one WiFi (half) miniPCIe slot

                                  Would in my eyes one good way to walk on in your case.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • D
                                    damir
                                    last edited by

                                    Big thanks for your response and providing additional VERY helpful information.
                                    I appreciate it.

                                    Hardware you just suggested to me, would be more recommended then getting something like:
                                    SUPERMICRO MBD-A1SRi-2758F  as advised in this thread?

                                    iPerf:

                                    [  4] local 192.168.1.1 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.10 port 10337
                                    [ ID] Interval      Transfer    Bandwidth
                                    [  4]  0.0-10.0 sec  1.09 GBytes  932 Mbits/sec
                                    [  5] local 192.168.1.1 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.10 port 10342
                                    [  5]  0.0-10.0 sec  1.09 GBytes  933 Mbits/sec
                                    [  4] local 192.168.1.1 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.10 port 10345
                                    [  4]  0.0-10.0 sec  1.06 GBytes  914 Mbits/sec
                                    [  5] local 192.168.1.1 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.10 port 10353
                                    [  5]  0.0-10.0 sec  1.07 GBytes  921 Mbits/sec
                                    [  4] local 192.168.1.1 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.10 port 10356
                                    [  4]  0.0-10.0 sec  1.05 GBytes  905 Mbits/sec
                                    [  5] local 192.168.1.1 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.10 port 10366
                                    [  5]  0.0-10.0 sec  1.07 GBytes  916 Mbits/sec

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • E
                                      edwardwong
                                      last edited by

                                      Maybe you should try to do WAN-LAN NAT throughput test? From your test the pfSense box virtually did nothing.

                                      PC1 (WAN) –- pfSense Box NAT -- PC2 (LAN)
                                      I did that with my Celeron N2930 + 4 x Intel i210AT and the result is great.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • A
                                        AR15USR
                                        last edited by

                                        @NEK4TE:

                                        That case comes with PSU unit, right? nothing else is needed regarding power for this mobo?

                                        so, it would be this case + that mobo + ram + disk, done? no custom parts / custom power setup, etc?

                                        thnx!

                                        If you are referring to the M350 it only comes with the PSU if you get that version.


                                        2.6.0-RELEASE

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • D
                                          damir
                                          last edited by

                                          @edwardwong:

                                          Maybe you should try to do WAN-LAN NAT throughput test? From your test the pfSense box virtually did nothing.

                                          PC1 (WAN) –- pfSense Box NAT -- PC2 (LAN)
                                          I did that with my Celeron N2930 + 4 x Intel i210AT and the result is great.

                                          ::) i think i better wait for Friday, and see what the throughput is, so i dont break something :)

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • D
                                            damir
                                            last edited by

                                            @AR15USR:

                                            @NEK4TE:

                                            That case comes with PSU unit, right? nothing else is needed regarding power for this mobo?

                                            so, it would be this case + that mobo + ram + disk, done? no custom parts / custom power setup, etc?

                                            thnx!

                                            If you are referring to the M350 it only comes with the PSU if you get that version.

                                            yes sir, and thank you

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.