Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Squid bypassing Sort?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Cache/Proxy
    1 Posts 1 Posters 662 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      dingbat
      last edited by

      I have tinkered around with this for some time, and cant find a solution. I am trying to make SNORT and Squid transparent proxy work together on the same box [2.3-RELEASE (i386)].

      BACKGROUND:
      I had Snort working for a long time. It was happily logging and blocking various traffic pursuant to the rule-set I selected. Everything appeared fine. Then I put Squid transparent proxy (with A/V) on, and started it up. It ran fine. Squid started eliminating various pieces of browser headers, as desired, and so on. But I noticed that Snort stopped having as many logs and blocks, though it continued to run normal (not broke).

      THOUGHTS:
      It appears that both programs are running fine, but it seems that the traffic that Squid is handling is somehow bypassing the Snort sensors. I think it may have something to do with this: http://bugs.endian.com/view.php?id=4455

      QUESTION:
      Does the traffic need to do this:
      Internet > Squid > Snort > LANĀ  (I think this is preferred)
      Or does the traffic need to do this:
      Internet > Snort > Squid > LAN

      And how does one tell Squid / Snort to pass traffic to the other.
      How do we get Snort and Squid to be fully operational under one PFSense box?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • First post
        Last post
      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.