• How to stop split tunnel with OpenVPN

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    4k Views
    jimpJ
    Probably means to only route select networks across the VPN instead of routing everything. That is the default behavior of OpenVPN on pfSense though. You have to check the box to force client traffic through the VPN in order to not do that.
  • External Management Console

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    L
    That automatically puts the management line in?  I ran out of time, but when the next window of opportunity arises to change the network around I'll give it a shot!
  • URL based split tunnel (e.g. for hulu or netflix)

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    5k Views
    C
    You can easily use URL tables in 2.0 to do that with a list of the CIDR blocks of US IPs. Or if you want to limit that to just Netflix and Hulu, go to ARIN and find all their IP blocks and create an alias with those.
  • Pfsense openvpn 3g not working

    Locked
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    5k Views
    Q
    thanks much
  • PfSense 2.0 RC3 tap/bridging mode for "road warrior" setup

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    S
    http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,36060.0.html http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,36156.0.html Edit: http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,38166.0.html
  • Limit openvpn to only one virtual interface

    Locked
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    F
    I'm using 1.2.3, it is clear now what I have to do.
  • Internal network <- OVPN Server <- pfSense as client <- XP machine

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    P
    solved, it was a routing problem on the windos server just added a route to the 192.168.9.0 network and now it works fine
  • [SOLVED] pfsense 2.0 RC3 site to site not working, bug?

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    6k Views
    C
    Solved! But I think I found a bug in the pfsense software …..... ?? The clue was here: routing table client: default    10.138.20.68    UGS    0    40850    1500    sis0     10.138.20.0/24    link#1    U    0    31725    1500    sis0     10.138.20.67    link#1    UHS    0    0    16384    lo0     127.0.0.1    link#5    UH    0    47    16384    lo0     192.168.2.0/24    link#2    U    0    63824    1500    sis1     192.168.2.8    link#2    UHS    0    0    16384    lo0     192.168.4.0/24    192.168.12.2    UGS    0    489    1500    ovpns1   192.168.12.0/24    192.168.12.2    UGS    0    1233    1500    ovpns1     192.168.12.1    link#8    UHS    0    0    16384    lo0     192.168.12.2    link#8    UH    0    0    1500    ovpns1     192.168.18.1    link#9    UH    0    0    1500    ovpnc3     192.168.18.2    link#9    UHS    0    0    16384    lo0 Initially I wanted a tls site to site tunnel and I used this pfsense box as server, I put 192.168.4.0/24 as remote network. Afterwards I deleted it, set up a road warrior network with tls and conigured a shared key tunnel for the site to site connection. 192.168.4.0/24 was removed from the server configuration (at least when I looked at the interface). I wanted to at 192.168.4.0/24 as remote network to the client but it refused to add the route. When I looked at the routing table I noticed that 192.168.4.0 was still connected to the server interface ovpns1! I made a backup of the configuration and there I saw an item <remote_network>192.168.4.0/24</remote_network> in the server config. (Again, in the interface this was nowhere to be seen!). I removed <remote_network>192.168.4.0/24</remote_network> from the xml and restored the edited config file and…...... it works :).
  • Which ipaddress for vpn ?

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    E
    @Metu69salemi: It would be better if you don't have another nat between your setup Clients need to know what external ip-address they're accessing. But because there is router's own lan-subnet, i don't know does this work. Maybe using portforwards from router will do it, but not sure Indeed why not connect you pfsense directly to your modem? incase if it's one box most boxes have the ability to go into just modem mode so you can get your public ip on your pfsense As for a range take 192.168.254.0/24 ? It doesn't really matter just take something that is clear to you
  • OpenVPN Clients can't route to IPSEC peer

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Difference between OpenVPN Server and Client in P2P mode

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    7k Views
    O
    No, this isn't correct (I found it out myself). OpenVPN behaves exactly as described in the manual. There is NO client or server in static-key mode. Even "clients" will connect to each other. The difference with pfsense is, that it omits the "remote <adress>" option when it's configured as server (if you add it under "Advanced configuration", you'll get the "client"; "rport" option is also important). This can be important if you connect to systems with dyndns adresses (for example), because you get a conection even if the "servers"-adress won't resolve at the moment (because the "server" connects the "client"). Anyway, it works as expected…</adress>
  • OpenVPN with only certificates, no users pfSense 2.0RC3

    Locked
    21
    0 Votes
    21 Posts
    25k Views
    T
    yeah i forgot the user manager  ;D but thats cool, now I got it thats exactly what i wanted thanks all (again)  ;)
  • Is there a way to do split DNS with road warriors? TinyDNS?

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    3k Views
    No one has replied
  • Startup script

    Locked
    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    6k Views
    jimpJ
    Upgrade to a recent snapshot if you aren't seeing an OpenVPN dynamic gateway (or if you see it but it's always "gathering data"). There were some bug fixes a week or so ago, after the official RC3.
  • MOVED: Possible bug in Cert manager

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • (Solved) OpenVPN + pfSense 2.0 RC3 + Debian Client

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    M
    What solved this one?
  • Local User access

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    jimpJ
    If they don't have a certificate, and you're on SSL/TLS, then they can't access the VPN. I don't think there is a permission for OpenVPN use, though there probably should be, may not see that until 2.1 though.
  • OpenVPN traffic blocked by rule

    Locked
    19
    0 Votes
    19 Posts
    13k Views
    P
    It appears that the update "2.0-RC3 (amd64) built on Wed Jun 29 18:35:57 EDT 2011 " fixed the issue. Very odd. Thanks for the input, guys.
  • OpenVPN pfSense 2.0 RC2 as client with auth_user_pass

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    6k Views
    N
    Thank you jimp, I'll try your suggestions ASAP then report back.
  • SOLVED: server key does not appear to be valid

    Locked
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    14k Views
    N
    Just some notes on the same topic is found here: http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,7840.msg198497.html#msg198497
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.