• Is effective blocking whole AS w/o Squid possible?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    108 Views
    No one has replied
  • ET SCAN Potential SSH Scan OUTBOUND SSH

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    414 Views
    X

    @mcury interesting I will have to look more. I do have usb backup but have had it for a while and this snort issue just recently started popping up. My backup still does work as far as I can tell.

  • Floating rule

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    173 Views
    No one has replied
  • Floating rule

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    116 Views
    No one has replied
  • per-port SYN cookies

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    142 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    5 Posts
    255 Views
    S

    @ddbnj It's probably in the docs somewhere. That one shows when adding a rule. There's an alias for each pfSense network/subnet plus This Firewall.

  • Forward 443/80 to upstream proxy?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    160 Views
    No one has replied
  • url blocking depending on client IP

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    282 Views
    M

    @Mr_JinX I agree with the possible security problems but i haven't found much negative information on it. Also they won me over because the dev worked on a few of my issues that were not working. So NXFilter has a built in net-flow collector. It wasn't working as i thought and they worked with me on fixing it.
    Its in the back of my mind of course that this app hasn't been vetted by anyone(as far as i know) but...so far....works as advertised.
    It has an updated categorization system, builtin netflow collector, and reporting (which isn't great). Fills the home requirement.

    The issue i have with the suggestion of external DNS services is that you cant track who is visiting what site as all source IP information will come from your WAN.

  • Proxmox web interface no longer avilable

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    469 Views
    W

    @viragomann thank you for your responses. I'm not sure I understand your questions fully. Can you break it down a little further? I'm new to all this

  • Suricatas "INDICATOR-SHELLCODE x86 setgid 0" Killing my VPN connection

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    448 Views
    S

    @unique_username Presumably you enabled those rules for a reason…?

    I would just say, try moving Suricata to LAN which will also avoid scanning all the packets that would normally be dropped by the firewall.

    Also if it’s just one IP being blocked you can suppress that alert for that IP.

  • Clear Firewall Logs only

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    176 Views
    No one has replied
  • Consolidating rules with NOT (invert) operator

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    395 Views
    S

    @GPz1100 I would guess your floating rule is allowing it if/since you're not blocking those ports otherwise. But, you say FTP transfer didn't work?

    Passive FTP ports are controlled by the server. Some use all 1024 through 65535.

    FWIW I usually prefer two rules just for clarity.

    The floating vs interface rule order may be involved here, too:
    https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/nat/process-order.html

  • Unifi Controller Behind Netgate 6100

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    558 Views
    N

    Yes, its right.
    VLANs are sub interface on the ix1, add under: Interfaces/Interface Assignments

  • Got pfSense on Azure working but pfSense update breaks

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    1k Views
    M

    @doiiido Thanks -- as much as I held off I just went with OPNSense for my Azure deployments. Hopefully Netgate addresses the issue in CE but I suspect they've blocked Azure Hardware IDs from getting updates if they're not paying and CE got included in that.

  • NG-2100 Trunks VLAN blocked

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    175 Views
    F

    Ok, so i got it sorted.

    TL;DR : A captive portal was enable and behave strangely on the SSID it was enabled on, wasn't showing when connecting, and cause the NG-2100 to drop packets.

    I first tried with a new NG-2100 in a lab, same configuration, and everything worked perfectly, so I suspected an issue with the LAN in production.
    I tried multiple thing, got some packet captures, and saw that UDP was working fine, everything in local was working fine, and TCP SYN packets were going out, but SA were block going back
    I tried to make an untagged port on the L2 switch with VLAN tag 2U to try without WLAN, and everything worked fine.

    I then tried to switch the VLAN on the SSID that was not working to go from 2T as 1U and figured out that there was a captive portal enabled on this SSID, probably from an old config that wasn't causing issue with old router. For whatever reason, the captive portal wasn't showing on this SSID when VLAN tagging was enabled, but was acting weird with TCP requests I guess.

    Removed captive portal, everything worked fine.

  • IPs disappearing from Alias table

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    233 Views
    P

    Notice the same behaviour
    It appears an alias containing two FQDN which resolve to the same IPv4 address are not included in the table at all about 50% of the time.

    Tested in pfsense v2.7.2

  • Locked myself out from GUI

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    121 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    7 Posts
    570 Views
    J

    Same problem here. I have an explicit pass rule for IGMP traffic that I enabled IP options on. The traffic is passing (verified with a tcpdump filter of igmp and ip[0] > 69) and yet filterlog is still recording it as being blocked and filling up the logs. The traffic is matching the rule without a log option...

    This feels like a regression, but this bug says it's not.

  • Firewall review

    35
    0 Votes
    35 Posts
    2k Views
    A

    @Gertjan Yea, I know that look fine because its from NetGate docs! Want to warry that as mentioned above you told that rule source LAN can not be for WAN)))

  • Cant create or edit aliases.

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    318 Views
    M

    @SteveITS said in Cant create or edit aliases.:

    @musicwizard Actually 2.7.2 is the latest.

    Are you saving the page with a blank field maybe? It looks like it is trying to write a blank value at the beginning of the error.

    i checked the update it said 2.7.1 but it was on previous stable selection. Updating now,

    edit:

    getting an error during update
    updating the EFI loader
    install: //boot/efi/efi/boot/INS@fmTwZj: Input/output error
    pkg-static: POST-INSTALL script failed
    failed.
    Failed

Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.