Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Connecting Cisco 3560 to Netgate 2100

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved L2/Switching/VLANs
    18 Posts 3 Posters 1.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • johnpozJ
      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @WN
      last edited by

      And you can not ping the pfsense IP from the switch? Then that screams firewall rule dude!

      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • W
        WN
        last edited by

        ef9ae277-c7e4-49ef-b591-044b5cbc981c-image.png

        So that rule wont allow traffic to PING the interface? Can you confirm so I'm not losing it.

        johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @WN
          last edited by johnpoz

          No - its TCP only! That doesn't allow ICMP.

          tcp.jpg

          Or UDP for dns either. If you want a ANY rule - icmp, tcp, udp, etc.. Then you have to set that in the rule and would show little *

          anyrule.jpg

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • W
            WN
            last edited by

            The top one should be correct then? I just want to get connectivity going and then I'll start peeling it back. Also, most of my experience is with ASA's. Do I need a bi-directional rule within the same interface?

            832b7627-af6c-4cb5-b069-39c232d5a1b1-image.png

            johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @WN
              last edited by johnpoz

              Yeah that rule would be true any any rule.

              edit: no you wouldn't need bidirectional rule, any return traffic would be allowed by the state created when inbound traffic to the interface is allowed.

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • W
                WN
                last edited by

                Yeah... Still didn't work.

                johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @WN
                  last edited by johnpoz

                  Well sniff on pfsense - pfsense can not answer ping if it never sees it.

                  Its not rocket science here - the traffic is tagged or its not, etc Post up your switch port config on pfsense and your switch..

                  If your seeing the mac - that says your L2 is connected.. If your rule allows for answer then it would work.

                  edit: You don't have any floating rules do you?

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • W
                    WN
                    last edited by

                    No floating just the any/any on each interface. Below are the uplinks for each vlan 10,20 and 30. I removed the vlan interfaes off the switch and te defalt gateway. there should be no more layer 3 on the switch

                    interface GigabitEthernet0/16
                    description Uplink to pFsense Vlan 10
                    switchport access vlan 10
                    switchport mode access
                    spanning-tree portfast

                    interface GigabitEthernet0/32
                    description Uplink to pFsense Vlan 20
                    switchport access vlan 20
                    switchport mode access
                    spanning-tree portfast

                    interface GigabitEthernet0/48
                    description Uplink to pFsense Vlan 30
                    switchport access vlan 30
                    switchport mode access
                    spanning-tree portfast

                    11b043a1-8e22-462e-8ca4-eff7977eae9b-image.png Arp on

                    4b370f40-1c27-4538-8194-6ccc8041431e-image.png

                    520ab3df-6e88-4e9f-92b1-68cae51b5538-image.png

                    f261fe9d-fd0f-46b7-94c0-3f514662305c-image.png

                    johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • johnpozJ
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @WN
                      last edited by johnpoz

                      @wn Nothing jumping out at me that is wrong there.. Have very sim setup on a 3100 with switch ports being untagged vlans.

                      If your firewall rules are any any.. and you showing the mac in your device your trying to ping from.. Then you should get an answer..

                      Really the only thing left to validate is traffic is being seen by pfsense - as stated if pfsense never sees the ping, it for sure can not answer. Seeing the traffic would have zero to do with rules being wrong or not, etc.

                      edit: Just for reference and example.. Here is my very sim sort of setup

                      mysetup.jpg

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • W
                        WN
                        last edited by

                        I I believe me removing all layer 3 interfaces from the cisco switch might have done the trick. I can ping the interfaces from the server IP's.

                        Thank you again for letting me bounce things off of you. Extremely important to have other eye look at your work. Thanks again!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.