Failed to retrieve package or update following a manual install of ntopng 5.1

thwong

@gertjan Thanks mate for the feedback. nTopng did save me at least a $100 in the coming few months. nTopng 0.8 may not have the feature that I need to monitor suspicious and unexpected traffic.

I'm not going to be an expert of Linux as being a network professional. Probably I should be back to where I was.

thwong

@jimp Thanks mate. I found 21.05 has a ntopng package of 4.x which doesn't come with the feature that I need. For now, I think I would be happy to have everything resumed with 4.x until it has a 'standard' 5.x package.

thwong

Wanna end this thread and the easy fix for me is to:

remove the ntopng packages.
update all the packages.
restart the firewall.

thwong

@jimp Thanks for mentioning the 21.02. I tried the development one and it still showing ntopng 4.0 community.
In shell, I got the following from 'ntopng -V'.

Version: 4.0.0 [Community build]
GIT rev: :5.0.211014

Thinking the package's built from 5.0. I either manually install ntopng 5.0 or get ntop to refund me the license I purchase. Seems there isn't an ideal solution for me.

jimp

I had a typo above, it should be 22.01 snapshots, not 21.02.

This is from a firewall running a 22.01 snapshot:

thwong

@jimp Thanks for the screenshot. The GUI appearance is v5.0 but it's somehow showing community version 4.0 that doesn't recognize my license. I had a word with nTop and they said pfsense ntop package should be still v4.0 and therefore cannot recognise my license which is in 5.0 format.

I'm running 22.01 development build and manually run ntopng 5.1 at my own risk because I really need it for improving my Internet usage at a lower cost to save the money I put it in buying the nTop license.

The broken pfsense repo can be recovered when I manually remove all the ntop related packages.

The following screen is from pfsense+ ntopng package.
Screen Shot 2021-11-15 at 23.43.12.png

The following screen is from ntop's ntopng package.
Screen Shot 2021-11-16 at 01.50.00.png

jimp

Then something else must be wrong in your system.

I'd suggest first trying it in an isolated setup, like a test VM running a 22.01 snapshot.

The ntopng package is definitely 5.x on 22.01, if you are seeing 4.x, then it isn't installing properly, likely due to other changes you've made on there.

thwong

@jimp Thanks for your suggestion. I am not a Linux guru and have no idea to run pfsense in a VM. The only I could try is to:

remove all ntop packages
remove all ntop directories
remove all ntop configuration in the system
remove the ntop repo
install ntop from pfsense repo

Will give it a try later this week.

Gertjan

@thwong said in Failed to retrieve package or update following a manual install of ntopng 5.1:

I am not a Linux guru and have no idea to run pfsense in a VM.

If, by any chance, you have a Windows 10 Pro system some where, you don't need any 'Linux' knowledge (actually worse, now you need Microsoft knowledge ...).

It goes like this " Virtualizing pfSense with Hyper-V Virtualizing pfSense with Hyper-V ".
Or take a look at several step-by-step youtube videos. Look at more then one !

I'll add in some advise :
Use at least 2 NIC's, which probably means you have a slide an extra network card.
Don't even think you can use an USB-NIC. Just don't ;)
One NIC will be your LAN, the other will be solely reserved for the VM and will be WAN.

It's pretty straight forward, and very nice to test thing out using close to zero extra hardware.

thwong

@gertjan Thanks mate for your advice. I will see if my daughter's Surface running Windows 10 Pro or not. All my systems are running OSX (Intel or M1). I recalled I run VirtualBox a long time ago for Arista switch stuff. Will see what I can do.

thwong

@jimp I did the following and still without luck to get the v5.0 running.

removal of all ntop packages
deletion of all ntop folders
reinstall ntopng package

However, I can tell the interface is looking like v5.0. v4.0 wouldn't be giving me some screens that I'm familiar with. At least my company is running both v4.2 and v5.1 so I could identify the difference.

I hope I have a chance to get it up in a VM. Or perhaps if I can pay to get it fixed because I run out of time for work.