Solved: Two factor authentication for admin login
-
I have 2 admins in our pfsense and other users for vpn.I selected Radius in Authentication Server in User Manager. But I still login with the username created in local database, plus I can't login with the username created in Radius. I checked credentials in Diagnostics, it says The following input errors were detected: Authentication failed.
-
If RADIUS login fails it falls back to local users, so your local admin user in pfSense will still work. That is a safety measure so that you don't get locked out by a broken RADIUS server.
You need to concentrate on fixing the RADIUS settings if the authentication is failing, something there still isn't quite right.
-
Is there a tutorial for this? I have another question. if there is no internet, can I still login into pfsense web gio with two factor authentication?
-
@emammadov said in Two factor authentication for admin login:
Is there a tutorial for this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2Z3rr4W2xw
https://www.slideshare.net/NetgateUSA/radius-and-ldap-on-pfsense-24-pfsense-hangout-february-2018I have another question. if there is no internet, can I still login into pfsense web gio with two factor authentication?
Google Authenticator does not actually contact Google for anything. It's a mathematically calculated OTP value based on your own key, date/time, etc. It isn't actually tied to any Google service/account/login/etc. It's basically a Google-branded equivalent to mOTP.
-
Thanks. I tried and it worked. Along with the user created on Radius, I can also login with the user created on local database though I have chosen Radius in Authentication Server. You said it is a safety measure.
I have a question. I disabled webgui login for default local admin user "admin" and it works only on console. I wonder if Radius login fails, 1. can I add any user created on the local database to admins group on pfsense console and 2. enable webgui login for admin user? -
The local user fallback will work for any local user, it doesn't need to be
admin
. You can grant that user whatever privileges you want them to have. If adding them to theadmins
group is what you want, that will work. -
I mean, I have disabled local admin user, so it can't login via webgui, it works only on ssh and console. If Radous server suddenly fails, how can I enable local admin user on SSH so that I can login via webgui!?
-
Yes, I know what you meant. What I'm saying is you can keep the actual "admin" account disabled and have some other local account you use instead that is always available for use.
Forcing yourself to re-enable admin when RADIUS is down is not a proper or reliable process. You can do it by resetting the admin password from the console which should re-enable it, or try
pfSsh.php playback changepassword admin
from the shell.I wouldn't leave the firewall without some kind of active fallback authentication account though.
-
Thank you very much.
-
@jimp Hi jimp.
I just implemented that setup, and if I let the local admin user enable to dont be locked out, the problem is that we can always login with that user without 2FA. My other admin user in freeradius with "Class := "admins"" work well, but the one local continue to works too!I'm a little bit afraid to delete the local one. You said if Radius failed it will user local data base ... but if I dont have admin user in local database?!?!
Thanks!
-
It will always fall back to local database if RADIUS is down or rejects the login, for safety. If that's a concern, set the admin password to something suitably long/complex and store it somewhere secure in case of RADIUS failure, but don't give the password to anyone else.
Or just forget the password and reset it from the console if you ever need to get in locally.
-
@jimp
I understand, but for security reason, it it not better to dont have local admin user? My goal to create 2FA admin access is to securise Admin access. If the local user still exist, even with a strong password, the possibility to brute force it exist?!?!?!Maybe I'm better dont use 2FA with my admin user, user really strong password and add rules to stop bruteforcing!?!?!
What is your vision about that?
Thanks for your advices!
-
You cannot delete the admin account as it's required for the firewall to function.
There is brute force protection already in pfSense that makes that kind of attack impractical.
If you set the password to a random long string >70 chars it's highly unlikely anything could practically brute force that. Especially if you have the GUI properly protected.
-
@jimp Thanks a lot. With you response, I can't find any advantage to put in place 2FA for the Admin account. I will only use a really strong password! However, I will use my freeradius for my OpenVPN client!
Thanks again and have a good weekend! -
-
-
So I have this set up and working with Google Authenticator but I just noticed what I consider to me a major security flaw: any admin can reveal any other admin's PIN and INIT-SECRET.
This allows for any admin to easily impersonate any other admin. This means that it is not possible to be 100% sure that activity undertaken by any given admin was actually done by that admin. This makes pfSense non-complaint with basic security requirements for NIST/CMMC and probably many others with similar requirements to tie activity to a specific indiviual.
I suspect this was maybe just overlooked? Can a future update please fix this pretty serious and unnecessary risk?
-
WARNING ABSOLUTE AMATEUR:
It did not work for me when I followed just these steps. It did work when I followed the steps and added the following:- SYSTEM->User management -> Edit admin user -> assign freeradius server certificate as user certificate.
- SYSTEM->User management -> Authentication servers -> protocol assign as PAP (did not test if this is necessary)
It does work with google authenticator (PIN+generated passcode) BUT it also works with the old password that was set for admin. Is there a way to ensure that the old password does not work?
-
@aaronssh did you open a redmine?
I suppose the mitigation would be to create a netadmin account that all your admins use to login with 2FA.
Agreed no one should see the PINs. -
@michmoor said in Solved: Two factor authentication for admin login:
Agreed no one should see the PINs.
How exactly should that be achievable? A TOTP base key for calculation is a stored secret that has to be used by the software to calculate the codes so AFAIR that can't be encrypted in any meaningless form. And as admin users normally are ADMINs - or root equivalents - they can simply get that info from the system, whatever barriers you put up in front of them can always be avoided. That's a "key to the castle" problem. Every admin that has a REAL admin access also has the tools to delete logs, impersonate other users etc. on any other system, may it be Linux, Windows etc. so I don't see how that should be non-compliant with any requirement that can't be reached other then making admins "not real admins" that only have a subset of administrative power? As I don't know the specifics of NIST/CMMC requirements, please correct me if I'm wrong as I'm just curious here. E.g. if I'm a Windows Administrator there's no problem in resetting the password of a fellow admin and logging in as him/her or looking up stored credentials that aren't/can't be further encrypted? Or Linux users having access to sudo/su that can login as another user and delete the logs afterwards?
Thanks & Cheers
-
In addition to the OTP calculation needing the PIN/secret, with how RADIUS works with OTP, it has to be set for PAP, which means the payload is sent in the clear. So it's best to keep that on the box if possible. If you must connect to a remote RADIUS system, wrap the connection in a VPN, stunnel, or similar.
-
@jegr said in Solved: Two factor authentication for admin login:
As I don't know the specifics of NIST/CMMC requirements, please correct me if I'm wrong as I'm just curious here. E.g. if I'm a Windows Administrator there's no problem in resetting the password of a fellow admin and logging in as him/her or looking up stored credentials that aren't/can't be further encrypted?
We're not allowed to know or reset users passwords, so we use a password portal that allows the user to self-reset after 2-factor via SMS. And as a Windows admin I have no way to retrieve a user's password, they are encrypted using non-reversible encryption (required by CMMC).
So if an admin did reset a password, it would immediately show up in the logs. CMMC requires that all logs are required to be centrally stored in a repository designed to store logs in a way that they can't be edited or modified by anyone. It would be possible to reset another Windows admin's password but would be easily traceable and alerts would go off.
In our 2-factor Windows solution (Authlite), keys CAN be exported and if you knew how to reverse engineer the export, you could probably find a way to get someone else's TOTP on a device somehow, but it would be some work and you'd still be missing their password -- its not anything like "click here to see PIN & key". And that's where the root of the concern is with pfSense. The PIN and key are just sitting there in plain text in the UI with zero obfuscation or encryption. It's WAY too easy and obvious to get that info. I agree with your premise that a sophisticated admin attacker could probably find a way somehow, my opinion is it just shouldn't be THAT incredibly easy and obvious.
We all know that obscurity is not security, but having some type of effort required to break in is sometimes enough. When it is easy and obvious how to break in, a disgruntled employee that might otherwise never bother might be tempted, because its SOOOO easy and obvious.
As a shop owner with a glass storefront, you don't just throw up your hands and leave the front door unlocked because anyone can break the glass anyway. There is still some common sense locking that takes place, even though the lock does not make the store invincible. Many people who would never break glass to steal something will walk in an open door to steal something; it's just an uncomfortable part of human nature that we all have to deal with at some level.