Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    2.5 Gbps Hardware

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    44 Posts 6 Posters 12.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      If you have people using and depending on that box you should not be running 2.7-Alpha. Yopu should go back to the 2.6-RC branch when you can.

      Steve

      ? J 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • ?
        A Former User @stephenw10
        last edited by

        @stephenw10, I totally agree with you, because if they know they need the system 100%, do they use development versions?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • J
          jsmiddleton4 @stephenw10
          last edited by jsmiddleton4

          @stephenw10

          Had I known 2.7.0 was an alpha version would've stayed clear.

          Any insight on what happened because I put 2 new 2.5gb NIC's in?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            If it was in addition to the existing 2.5G NICs it probably re-ordered them and the old interfaces had pass rules which then no longer applied.

            But without seeing what was happening at the time that's just a guess.

            J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              jsmiddleton4 @stephenw10
              last edited by jsmiddleton4

              @stephenw10

              It did of course reassign them. igc0 became ig4, etc.

              I put all the NIC's in the bridge list and saved it.

              Would make sense if all clients couldn't connect. It was just the 1gb ones.

              Even if some assignment got confused in the firewall rules for the bridge lan, how would 2.5gb clients get through?

              Edit: Additional piece just found out. The two that would not connect are work PC's. They are configured to use only IPV6. They connect to the employers VPN. Only show "Internet Connectivity" with IPV6 even though IPV4 is present in their NIC's Status information.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                Ok, then I'd guess this is an IPv6 issue and not a 1G vs 2.5G problem.

                J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • J
                  jsmiddleton4 @stephenw10
                  last edited by jsmiddleton4

                  @stephenw10

                  As noted connected to the 1gb port on the same box, the built in Realtek LAN port, worked fine.

                  "re0" woulda stayed the same though......I didn't put more Realtek based cards in.

                  Now that I have, like I did before and removed them, rules for each card, member of the bridge, can I remove the LAN rule I created?

                  The Asus AX86U which worked when those two clients were connected to its 1gb ports, what I didn't do was plug one of those clients into the 2.5gb port the Asus AX86U was connected to.

                  That's the one 2.5gb port I didn't test.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    If you moved filtering from the bridge interface to the member interfaces then you don't need a rule on the assigned bridge interface, but it doesn't hurt to leave it there.

                    J 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • J
                      jsmiddleton4 @stephenw10
                      last edited by

                      @stephenw10

                      Thanks. It is getting traffic at least the counter is showing so.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        jsmiddleton4 @stephenw10
                        last edited by

                        @stephenw10

                        For kicks I set everything back the way it was for the tunable to track the bridge, not member interfaces, and had just the LAN firewall rule enabled.

                        It works for all clients.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • J JimBob Indiana referenced this topic on
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.