Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    pfSense compile requirements for 3rd party software

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Development
    7
    101
    19.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • E
      encrypt1d @bmeeks
      last edited by encrypt1d

      @bmeeks

      Packages need to have the correct include files in the /usr/include tree on the box where the packages are being built.

      I tried the following two things based on that advice:

      1. Outright replacement of /usr/include with only the contents of the pfSense
        /git/FreeBSD-src/include. This resulting in missing headers, and compile failure.

      2. I set /usr/include set back to original content, then copied contents of the pfSense repo /git/FreeBSD-src/include into /usr/include (effectively a merge over top of the original). This compiles, links, and runs on the firewall, but with the same ioctl errors.

      3. Copied all of the pfSense git repo contents (FreeBSD-src) into /usr. Build works, same ioctl issues.

      Am I chasing my tail trying to do this outside a poudriere jail?

      bmeeksB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • bmeeksB
        bmeeks @encrypt1d
        last edited by bmeeks

        @encrypt1d said in pfSense compile requirements for 3rd party software:

        @bmeeks

        Packages need to have the correct include files in the /usr/include tree on the box where the packages are being built.

        I tried the following two things based on that advice:

        1. Outright replacement of /usr/include with only the contents of the pfSense
          /git/FreeBSD-src/include. This resulting in missing headers, and compile failure.

        2. I set /usr/include set back to original content, then copied contents of the pfSense repo /git/FreeBSD-src/include into /usr/include (effectively a merge over top of the original). This compiles, links, and runs on the firewall, but with the same ioctl errors.

        3. Copied all of the pfSense git repo contents (FreeBSD-src) into /usr. Build works

        Am I chasing my tail trying to do this outside a poudriere jail?

        I think your experiement with the header files proves there are some differences in your build environment versus what the pfSense image and package builder uses.

        You can create your own pfSense build system. I have one I use when testing my package changes for Snort and Suricata. It won't successfully build a pfSense kernel or install image, but it builds packages just fine that I then install over on my pfSense virtual machine test boxes.

        I will give you the overall high-level steps. Warning -- this endeavor is not for everyone! It will very likely take some fiddling around to get things working. There is no great documentation of the steps (at least that I've found).

        NOTE: in the steps below I've given the full URL of the repo branch on GitHub. When you actually run the clone command, you will need to use the *.git file instead, then switch to the appropriate branch when building. So https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense.git

        1. Create a new directory on your builder. Clone this GitHub repo into a directory on your builder machine: https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/tree/RELENG_2_5_2. I chose /usr/home/pfsense for my directory. Change into the directory you created and then clone the repo there. So when the clone completes, if you used my example path, you will have a /usr/home/pfsense/pfsense directory full of the PHP source code and various build configuration things in that last pfsense subdirectory.

        2. Next you need to clone the FreeBSD-ports repo. So using my example path, you would change into the /usr/home/pfsense directory and clone this repo: https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/tree/RELENG_2_5_2. This will create a ports tree of all the pfSense packages in /usr/home/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports.

        3. You now need to create a builder.conf file in the top-level of that final pfsense directory created by the first cloning step. There is a sample conf file there already called builder.conf.sample that you can copy from and customize.

        4. Make sure you are in that final pfsense directory and then issue this command to begin the setup of your builder environment:

        ./build.sh --setup

        Hopefully that runs to a successful completion. If not, you will need to troubleshoot using any error messages that print.

        1. Next you need to run the routine to create the Poudriere jail. This will take a long time depending on your hardware. On my modest virtual machine builders it takes over 4 hours. Here is the command:
        ./build.sh --setup-poudriere

        When that finishes, you should have a functional builder jail environment. To build the initial package tree run:

        ./build.sh --update-pkg-repo -a amd64.amd64

        That will build all the packages for the Intel/AMD architecture and store them in /usr/local/poudriere/packages.

        E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • E
          encrypt1d @bmeeks
          last edited by

          @bmeeks
          I will give it a try, thanks.

          bmeeksB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • bmeeksB
            bmeeks @encrypt1d
            last edited by bmeeks

            @encrypt1d said in pfSense compile requirements for 3rd party software:

            @bmeeks
            I will give it a try, thanks.

            If you get a working stock package builder, then the miniupnpd package should build and install on a pfSense firewall (of the same base pfSense version as the builder where the package was created).

            I know that it works, because I build Snort and Suricata binary packages (and the PHP GUI parts as well) in my package builder all the time. I even upload them to a web server that serves as a pkg repository so I can install my packages from SYSTEM > PACKAGE MANAGER in pfSense. I do that by adding an additional repo that references my local web server to the pkg repo configuration. I do that so I can test all phases of my packages including installation, removal, and updating.

            E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • E
              encrypt1d @bmeeks
              last edited by encrypt1d

              @bmeeks

              In the build.conf file,
              Should these lines point to the FreeBSD official, or the pfSense version, ie should it be this:

              # Define FreeBSD repository, branch and specific commit
export FREEBSD_REPO_BASE=https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-src.git
export FREEBSD_BRANCH=RELENG_2_5_2

              or this:

              # Define FreeBSD repository, branch and specific commit
export FREEBSD_REPO_BASE=https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd.git
export FREEBSD_BRANCH=stable/10
              bmeeksB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • bmeeksB
                bmeeks @encrypt1d
                last edited by bmeeks

                @encrypt1d said in pfSense compile requirements for 3rd party software:

                @bmeeks

                In the build.conf file,
                Should these lines point to the FreeBSD official, or the pfSense version, ie should it be this:

                # Define FreeBSD repository, branch and specific commit
export FREEBSD_REPO_BASE=https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-src.git
export FREEBSD_BRANCH=RELENG_2_5_2

                or this:

                # Define FreeBSD repository, branch and specific commit
export FREEBSD_REPO_BASE=https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd.git
export FREEBSD_BRANCH=stable/10

                The FREEBSD_BRANCH line should point to the pfSense branch. So you have it right in the first example: RELENG_2_5_2.

                But as of just a little while ago, that is now RELENG_2_6_0 as they released 2.6.0 CE and 22.01 pfSense Plus this morning. So be careful and keep the branch in the builder synced up with the branch installed on your firewall.

                And if you swap branches, you will likely need to rebuild the FreeBSD jail used by Poudriere. Run the shell script with no arguments to see all the command options like this:

                ./build.sh

                One of the options is to update the poudriere jails.

                E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • E
                  encrypt1d @bmeeks
                  last edited by

                  @bmeeks

                  Is it a requirement to be running a local repo server?

                  Seems like it might be - I see in the logs it is trying to access online content to my "nonSense" build. There doesn't seem to be an option to disable that.

                  pdating nonSense-core repository catalogue...
pkg: http://release-staging.nyi.netgate.com/ce/packages/nonSense_v2_6_0_amd64-core/meta.txz: Forbidden
repository nonSense-core has no meta file, using default settings
pkg: http://release-staging.nyi.netgate.com/ce/packages/nonSense_v2_6_0_amd64-core/packagesite.pkg: Forbidden
pkg: http://release-staging.nyi.netgate.com/ce/packages/nonSense_v2_6_0_amd64-core/packagesite.txz: Forbidden
Unable to update repository nonSense-core
Updating nonSense repository catalogue...
pkg: http://release-staging.nyi.netgate.com/ce/packages/nonSense_v2_6_0_amd64-nonSense_v2_6_0/meta.txz: Forbidden
repository nonSense has no meta file, using default settings
pkg: http://release-staging.nyi.netgate.com/ce/packages/nonSense_v2_6_0_amd64-nonSense_v2_6_0/packagesite.pkg: Forbidden
pkg: http://release-staging.nyi.netgate.com/ce/packages/nonSense_v2_6_0_amd64-nonSense_v2_6_0/packagesite.txz: Forbidden
Unable to update repository nonSense
Error updating repositories!
                  bmeeksB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • bmeeksB
                    bmeeks @encrypt1d
                    last edited by

                    @encrypt1d said in pfSense compile requirements for 3rd party software:

                    @bmeeks

                    Is it a requirement to be running a local repo server?

                    Seems like it might be - I see in the logs it is trying to access online content to my "nonSense" build. There doesn't seem to be an option to disable that.

                    pdating nonSense-core repository catalogue...
pkg: http://release-staging.nyi.netgate.com/ce/packages/nonSense_v2_6_0_amd64-core/meta.txz: Forbidden
repository nonSense-core has no meta file, using default settings
pkg: http://release-staging.nyi.netgate.com/ce/packages/nonSense_v2_6_0_amd64-core/packagesite.pkg: Forbidden
pkg: http://release-staging.nyi.netgate.com/ce/packages/nonSense_v2_6_0_amd64-core/packagesite.txz: Forbidden
Unable to update repository nonSense-core
Updating nonSense repository catalogue...
pkg: http://release-staging.nyi.netgate.com/ce/packages/nonSense_v2_6_0_amd64-nonSense_v2_6_0/meta.txz: Forbidden
repository nonSense has no meta file, using default settings
pkg: http://release-staging.nyi.netgate.com/ce/packages/nonSense_v2_6_0_amd64-nonSense_v2_6_0/packagesite.pkg: Forbidden
pkg: http://release-staging.nyi.netgate.com/ce/packages/nonSense_v2_6_0_amd64-nonSense_v2_6_0/packagesite.txz: Forbidden
Unable to update repository nonSense
Error updating repositories!

                    I think you can just comment out those lines in builder.conf by placing a "#" character at the start of each line. These little issues are what I meant when I said getting a builder configured takes a lot of patience. It is not a simple click, click, done sort of thing.

                    Here is my builder.conf file from my RELEASE builder. I have two: one for DEVEL and another for RELEASE.

                    # Define FreeBSD repository, branch and specific commit
export FREEBSD_REPO_BASE=https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-src.git
export FREEBSD_BRANCH="RELENG_2_5_2"
#export GIT_FREEBSD_COSHA1=##HASH##

# Do not clean FreeBSD obj dirs
#export NO_CLEAN_FREEBSD_OBJ=YES

# Do not clean FreeBSD src dir
#export NO_CLEAN_FREEBSD_SRC=YES

# rsync data to upload snapshots
#export RSYNCIP="your.snapshot.server"
#export RSYNCUSER="username"
#export RSYNCPATH="/usr/local/www/snapshots"
#export RSYNCLOGS="/usr/local/www/snapshots/logs"

# rsync data to upload pkg repo
export PKG_RSYNC_HOSTNAME="vm-pfpackages.themeeks.net"
export PKG_RSYNC_USERNAME="root"
export PKG_RSYNC_SSH_PORT="22"
export PKG_RSYNC_DESTDIR="/usr/local/www/apache22/data/packages"

export STAGING_HOSTNAME="pfsense-builder-RELEASE.themeeks.net"

# Set these when doing RELEASE package builds
#export PKG_FINAL_RSYNC_HOSTNAME="vm-pfpackages.themeeks.net"
#export PKG_FINAL_RSYNC_DESTDIR="/usr/local/www/apache22/data/packages"

# pkg repo URL
export PKG_REPO_SERVER_DEVEL="pkg+https://beta.pfsense.org/packages"
export PKG_REPO_SERVER_RELEASE="pkg+https://pkg.pfsense.org"
export PKG_REPO_SERVER_STAGING="pkg+https://pkg.pfsense.org"

# Command used to sign pkg repo
export PKG_REPO_SIGN_KEY="/root/repo.key"
export PKG_REPO_SIGNING_COMMAND="/root/repo_sign.sh ${PKG_REPO_SIGN_KEY}"

# Added for private repo to skip rsync to Netgate RELEASE server
export SKIP_FINAL_RSYNC=YES

# Branch to replace pkg.conf template, defaults to $GIT_REPO_BRANCH_OR_TAG
#export PKG_REPO_BRANCH_DEVEL="BRANCH"
#export PKG_REPO_BRANCH_RELEASE="v2_3_2"
                    E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • E
                      encrypt1d @bmeeks
                      last edited by

                      @bmeeks

                      getting a builder configured takes a lot of patience. It is not a simple click, click, done sort of thing.

                      I am committed to getting it to work, and I am very appreciative of all the help.

                      Indeed I started with all of the repo lines commented out, yet it is still trying to access that online content. No matter what I do in the build.conf file, it tries to access a non-existent repo and then defaults out.

                      Updating nonSense-core repository catalogue...
pkg: http://release-staging.nyi.netgate.com/ce/packages/nonSense_v2_6_0_amd64-core/meta.txz: Forbidden
repository nonSense-core has no meta file, using default settings

                      My build.conf is as follows:

                      export PRODUCT_NAME="nonSense"
#export PRODUCT_URL="https://PRODUCT_URL/"

# Define FreeBSD repository, branch and specific commit
#export FREEBSD_REPO_BASE=https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd.git
#export FREEBSD_BRANCH=stable/10p
#export GIT_FREEBSD_COSHA1=##HASH##
export FREEBSD_REPO_BASE=https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-src.git
export FREEBSD_BRANCH=RELENG_2_5_2

# Do not clean FreeBSD obj dirs
#export NO_CLEAN_FREEBSD_OBJ=YES

# rsync data to upload snapshots
#export RSYNCIP="your.snapshot.server"
#export RSYNCUSER="username"
#export RSYNCPATH="/usr/local/www/snapshots"

# rsync data to upload pkg repo
#export PKG_RSYNC_HOSTNAME="pkg_repo_hostname"
#export PKG_RSYNC_USERNAME="username"
#export PKG_RSYNC_SSH_PORT="22"
#export PKG_RSYNC_DESTDIR="/usr/local/www/beta/packages"
export SKIP_FINAL_RSYNC=YES

# pkg repo URL
#export PKG_REPO_SERVER_DEVEL="pkg+http://packages-beta.netgate.com/packages"
#export PKG_REPO_SERVER_RELEASE="pkg+http://packages.netgate.com"
#export PKG_REPO_SERVER_STAGING="pkg+http://release-staging.netgate.com/ce/packages"
export PKG_REPO_SERVER_DEVEL="pkg+https://beta.pfsense.org/packages"
export PKG_REPO_SERVER_RELEASE="pkg+https://pkg.pfsense.org"
export PKG_REPO_SERVER_STAGING="pkg+https://pkg.pfsense.org"
# Command used to sign pkg repo
export PKG_REPO_SIGN_KEY="/root/repo.key"
export PKG_REPO_SIGNING_COMMAND="/root/repo_sign.sh ${PKG_REPO_SIGN_KEY}"

# Branch to replace pkg.conf template, defaults to $GIT_REPO_BRANCH_OR_TAG
#export PKG_REPO_BRANCH_DEVEL="BRANCH"
#export PKG_REPO_BRANCH_RELEASE="BRANCH"
                      bmeeksB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • bmeeksB
                        bmeeks @encrypt1d
                        last edited by bmeeks

                        @encrypt1d:
                        You may wind up having to edit/modify the shell script code in ./tools/builder_common.sh to get things to work. The code in /builder.sh simply calls functions with ./tools/builder_common.sh to do the actual job you request.

                        This whole build system is geared towards Netgate building the official images and packages. It really does not work out of the box for other things without editing. It's been a very long time (years) since I set my two boxes up, so I don't recall all the hoops I jumped through. Since then, I've used other commands to stay updated without totally rebuilding my two builder machines.

                        You can try changing the PRODUCT_NAME to "pfSense" as a test. I think that also means you have to toggle the "Authorized_by_Netgate" switch or else tests in the functions that are called will bail out and print a copyright warning. This logic is all designed to prevent pirates from producing "pfSense" images and then installing and selling them. However, it does cause lots of roadblocks when all you want to do is simply build packages and you have no interest in building a kernel or pfSense install image.

                        E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • E
                          encrypt1d @bmeeks
                          last edited by encrypt1d

                          @bmeeks
                          Using your tip about the product name really helped eliminate a lot of errors, and I had to comment out two items in the tools/builder_common.sh. One was an imaginary new package it seemed to try and install called <productname>-builder, or in my case pfSense-builder. I commented out the install command. Since I had chosen the pfSense product name it also tried to clone the GNID repo (doesn't seem to exist?), which I don't think I care about, so I commented out those lines too.

                          The --setup-poudriere option errors out right away, making me think I need to do some setup work on it first. I do have it installed, but made the assumption that the option in the build.sh would do all that for me.

                          Do I need to do some pre-work on poudriere first?

                          >>> Operation ./build.sh has started at Sun Feb 13 20:32:13 EST 2022
>>> ERROR: ZFS tank zroot not found, please create it and try again...
                          bmeeksB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • bmeeksB
                            bmeeks @encrypt1d
                            last edited by bmeeks

                            @encrypt1d said in pfSense compile requirements for 3rd party software:

                            @bmeeks
                            Using your tip about the product name really helped eliminate a lot of errors, and I had to comment out two items in the tools/builder_common.sh. One was an imaginary new package it seemed to try and install called <productname>-builder, or in my case pfSense-builder. I commented out the install command. Since I had chosen the pfSense product name it also tried to clone the GNID repo (doesn't seem to exist?), which I don't think I care about, so I commented out those lines too.

                            The --setup-poudriere option errors out right away, making me think I need to do some setup work on it first. I do have it installed, but made the assumption that the option in the build.sh would do all that for me.

                            Do I need to do some pre-work on poudriere first?

                            >>> Operation ./build.sh has started at Sun Feb 13 20:32:13 EST 2022
>>> ERROR: ZFS tank zroot not found, please create it and try again...

                            Oh, yes -- forgot to tell you that your builder needs to be running on ZFS because that's what the Poudriere setup expects. So you may need to rebuild your builder machine to use ZFS instead of the default UFS. My two builders are virtual machines on ESXi, and when I created my most recent one for RELEASE package building I had to tear it down and start over because I forgot to use ZFS on the initial FreeBSD install.

                            But sounds like you found the other gotcha points. The GNID thing is proprietary code, and I commented it out as well. That part of the script is only hit during initial setup or when you run the "--update-sources" subcommand.

                            E 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • E
                              encrypt1d @bmeeks
                              last edited by

                              @bmeeks

                              Cool. I have all the instructions recorded, so a rebuild isn't too big a deal.

                              E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • E
                                encrypt1d @encrypt1d
                                last edited by

                                Looking good so far. Now I wait ;)

                                root@devbox:/build/pfsense # ./build.sh --setup
>>> Operation ./build.sh has started at Tue Feb 15 10:11:28 EST 2022
>>> Obtaining FreeBSD sources (RELENG_2_5_2)...
====>> Cloning git repository https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-src.git (RELENG_2_5_2)
Skipping clone of https://github.com/pfsense/gnid.git
Skipping install of pfSense-builder
>>> Operation ./build.sh has ended at Tue Feb 15 10:25:52 EST 2022
root@devbox:/build/pfsense # ./build.sh --setup-poudriere
>>> Operation ./build.sh has started at Tue Feb 15 10:27:16 EST 2022
>>> Creating ZFS filesystem zroot/poudriere... Done!
>>> Creating poudriere.conf
>>> Creating jail pfSense_v2_5_2_amd64, it may take some time...
                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • E
                                  encrypt1d @bmeeks
                                  last edited by

                                  @bmeeks
                                  While that is running, what are the next steps beyond the jail setup in order to build a specific port package?

                                  bmeeksB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • bmeeksB
                                    bmeeks @encrypt1d
                                    last edited by bmeeks

                                    @encrypt1d said in pfSense compile requirements for 3rd party software:

                                    @bmeeks
                                    While that is running, what are the next steps beyond the jail setup in order to build a specific port package?

                                    I've never found the magic word for building a specific port. That's because the Netgate shell script is geared toward building the whole repository.

                                    However, once you build the first round (which will take quite some time, especially the Rust port), then subsequent rounds will only build the packages that have been changed. Therefore, so long as you don't "refresh" your local Poudriere ports tree, none of the other packages will need to be rebuilt. You can just change your miniupnpd package and then when you run this:

                                    ./build.sh --update-pkg-repo -a amd64.amd64

                                    it will only rebuild miniupnpd if that's the only package with a change. For your troubleshooting steps, assuming you will want to rebuild your package several times, you will need to delete the package from /usr/local/poudriere/data/packages/.. so Poudriere will see it missing and build it again. Either that, or in the Makefile for miniupnpd you can increment the version number to signal Poudriere to rebuild the port. In your case bumping the version number in the Makefile might be the fastest method.

                                    Then when you have it working like you want, you can change the version number back to maybe just one past the current one in pfSense, delete the package from the path I mentioned above, then build it one last time.

                                    E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                    • E
                                      encrypt1d @bmeeks
                                      last edited by

                                      @bmeeks

                                      I will still be able to use the patching technique @jimp suggested? I.e make extract, change files, make patch?

                                      bmeeksB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • bmeeksB
                                        bmeeks @encrypt1d
                                        last edited by bmeeks

                                        @encrypt1d said in pfSense compile requirements for 3rd party software:

                                        @bmeeks

                                        I will still be able to use the patching technique @jimp suggested? I.e make extract, change files, make patch?

                                        Yes, that technique should still work to create the patch file or files. One convention commonly used is to consolidate all the changes for a given bug fix or feature add into a single patch file. Then you name the patch file something that aligns with what the patch does. So if you are adding a new feature or fixing some specific bug, then put all the patched files into a single *.diff patch and name it something that reflects the new feature added or the bug fixed.

                                        E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • E
                                          encrypt1d @bmeeks
                                          last edited by

                                          @bmeeks
                                          The jail setup completed successfully. Apparently your machine is faster than my virtual machine, ouch. 11 hrs.

                                          root@devbox:/build/pfsense # ./build.sh --setup-poudriere
>>> Operation ./build.sh has started at Tue Feb 15 10:27:16 EST 2022
>>> Creating ZFS filesystem zroot/poudriere... Done!
>>> Creating poudriere.conf
>>> Creating jail pfSense_v2_5_2_amd64, it may take some time... 
Done!
>>> Creating poudriere ports tree, it may take some time... Done!
>>> Poudriere is now configured!
>>> Operation ./build.sh has ended at Tue Feb 15 21:16:43 EST 2022

                                          Is my next step to run this?

                                          ./build.sh none

                                          I kicked that off (and sorted out all the missing packages it needed) and would prefer to know if that isn't the right command before I let it run too long to find out otherwise.

                                          bmeeksB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • bmeeksB
                                            bmeeks @encrypt1d
                                            last edited by bmeeks

                                            @encrypt1d said in pfSense compile requirements for 3rd party software:

                                            Is my next step to run this?

                                            ./build.sh none

                                            I kicked that off (and sorted out all the missing packages it needed) and would prefer to know if that isn't the right command before I let it run too long to find out otherwise.

                                            I run this command to build the package tree:

                                            ./build.sh --update-pkg-repo -a amd64.amd64

                                            That will build all the packages for AMD64/Intel architectures. You can just execute the shell script with no arguments to see all the available options like this:

                                            ./build.sh

                                            I just rebuilt the jail in my RELEASE builder since I had to update it to the latest FreeBSD 12.3 with the recent 2.6.0 pfSense release, and it took about as long as yours. Much longer than I remembered from the past.

                                            E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post