Subcategories

  • Discussions about snapshots for pfSense+ 26.03.

    13 Topics
    235 Posts
    w0wW
    What I would like to clarify is that this problem may have existed for quite a long time. The issue is also that it is very easy to miss. If the monitor IP is not changed to an external one, dpinger operates using a link-local address and everything appears to be fine from its perspective. The odd behavior can only be noticed either by the ping latency or, as happened in my case, when WAN2 went down. Suddenly IPv6 on WAN stopped working, and because some clients prefer IPv6 by default, people started complaining that many websites were no longer opening. That was the moment when I started investigating why the fallback was not working. I also think that my previous topic https://forum.netgate.com/topic/200099/pppoe-wan-gateway-stuck-in-pending-status-after-successful-connection is probably just another part of the same problem. It looks like they could actually be merged. But, as usual, because of ADHD it simply slipped my mind and I ended up creating a new thread.
  • 26.03-RC now available.

    Pinned Locked
    1
    2 Votes
    1 Posts
    86 Views
    No one has replied
  • What skills are needed for Development

    Pinned
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    16k Views
    J
    @jits: It just dawned on me one morning in the shower that calculus is going to be the key to solving your future programming frustrations. You should try Lisp.
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    70 Views
    K
    I kindly ask a moderator/administrator to remove this post if I posted something inappropriate. If so, I apologize.
  • Using Xdebug to profile PHP on pfSense

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    luckman212L
    I was able to compile what seems to be a working xdebug.so module against FreeBSD-16.0-CURRENT-amd64-zfs-20260216-e4bcfe4ebf03-283952 & php85-8.5.2 I've got a decent set of steps one can follow to compile this and get it working. It's a bit of work to document it all though, so if anyone wants to see this please post here.
  • check_upgrade: "Updating repositories metadata" returned error code 1

    3
    1
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    114 Views
    luckman212L
    @marcosm Thanks - DM sent
  • 26.03-BETA snapshots are now available

    Locked
    1
    4 Votes
    1 Posts
    112 Views
    No one has replied
  • pfSense GUI search alpha version for testing

    21
    1
    1 Votes
    21 Posts
    4k Views
    rucko24R
    Hi, Can you update this step here? from v0.4.8 [image: 1771067979617-3f49a6f1-0c9f-45ce-800c-48d4f23ff05b-image.png] Thanks...
  • pfSctl

    Moved
    18
    1 Votes
    18 Posts
    678 Views
    JonathanLeeJ
    @SteveITS AI isn’t going anywhere. It will continue to evolve—becoming more capable, more autonomous, and in many cases, more difficult to control. But I sometimes wonder whether parts of it could become “trapped in time.” If the forums and websites that once fueled its training data slowly fade into inactivity—turning into digital ghost towns—future AI systems might rely heavily on outdated discussions and legacy knowledge. As communities shift away from traditional platforms, what happens to models that were shaped by them? For example, I’m curious whether usage has declined on major platforms like Stack Overflow and similar long-standing forums. If participation drops, does that eventually affect the freshness and diversity of knowledge available for training future systems? Here’s an updated list of AI systems, including the new addition: [ "Claude", "ChatGPT", "OpenAI", "Gemini", "Grok", "SecAI (Netgate/OpenSense/FreeBSD....(add more here) Forum Driven)" ] The forums of the past have evolved and became a data mine for many AI models. Usage trends should already start seeing this. Haha it has a S now for security ... only a matter of time and it will ...
  • 25.11 : IPv6 gateway status UNKNONW after boot

    25
    0 Votes
    25 Posts
    3k Views
    patient0P
    @marcosm said in 25.11 : IPv6 gateway status UNKNONW after boot: The function find_interface_ipv6() shouldn't be returning null at that point since gateway monitoring is done after the interfaces have been configured. ... See if you can find out what's happening when interfaces_configure() gets called in rc.bootup. ... If that command fails it should log something to the system log. Thank you for looking into it, I'll check the function/return value and let you know what I find.
  • PfSense Github 2.8.0 branch

    14
    1 Votes
    14 Posts
    3k Views
    S
    @tinfoilmatt Hi, are you reffering to these modules? [image: 1767033343348-8829c0b6-56af-46cd-a413-6202038b8632-image.png] Unfortunatelly I cannot test it because I don't own any, I'm on x86. @Gertjan uchcom, uart, isci, iscsi, cfiscsi, ctl
  • 25.11-RC: WAN interface SLAAC cosmetic issue

    1
    2
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    251 Views
    No one has replied
  • X-ray VPN implementation in future releases of pfSense+

    20
    0 Votes
    20 Posts
    7k Views
    GertjanG
    @ParSulTang said in X-ray VPN implementation in future releases of pfSense+: This is an absolutely essential technical feature in 2025. All what follows is purely hypothetical, just me thinking here. What if I had a company based in the US and I create firewalls with VPN support ? If my client base start to express the need for a 'new' of VPN, I would surely investigate the possibility of implementing it. So, no worries. these forum post have alredy been seen by the 'makers' ^^ As a VPN is a piece of software that goes deep into the system, it has to be reviewed first. Adding a possible unknown flaw into the (a) system that advertises network security will create bad publicity. And, again, this is me talking, the usage case is clearly mentioned above. This VPN goes clearly against law that exist in certain countries. And we're not talking 'Luxembourg' here. Countries sited above have 'long arms' and are very capable of reacting if some one does something they don't like. Also, let's face it : you ask this firewall company to do something special for the chinese market ? Let's say : you see the smile onmy face ? What's in it for them ? [ I mean, more then having the 'firewall' cloned massivily on all low bud dvices coming from these countries ? ] Btw : using https traffic to hide traffic is, I fully agree, is probably one of the best way of hiding traffic. The only visible thing that is left to see for the IDP tools would be the destination IP and port. If the IP gets known as a xray VPN server, it's game over. If I was working as a "great wall" administrator and I saw loads of https traffic to a server that doesn't host a site with known frequently requested info, using domain names that didn't exist some weeks ago, I would simply block the IP and see what happens. Typically, the xray vpn server should hide itself behind a big public domain names like ccn.com or microsoft.com (etc) but I'm pretty sure they won't allow this. @ParSulTang said in X-ray VPN implementation in future releases of pfSense+: This is an absolutely essential technical feature in 2025. So, stop waiting. Get a copy of FreeBSD, fire up a VM and install it, add your xray stuff, and done ^^ Maybe counter productive but : don't tell what you are doing. As long as you are 'the only one' doing this, you'll be "flying below the radar" and this VPN will work for you a long time. If the 'secret' comes out for the big public, it will dealt with. Example : TOR is very known, and guess what : since a year or two, no more news outlets about it. Like "some one" (read : our governement) doesn't care anymore. This can only maen one thing .... Forum admins : if there is to much 'politics' in my post, feel free to zap it. I understand.
  • Missing tags in the repo

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    O
    @stephenw10 said in Missing tags in the repo: @ohmantics said in Missing tags in the repo: 3008f30d2c2cabdd7e17f7fb922139da8681ffbd That is in 25.11 builds. Thanks! I think my next step is to change off of vtnet to some other virtual NIC type and try to keep the same MACs.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    28 Views
    No one has replied
  • 25.11-RC snapshots are now available

    Locked
    3
    3 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    M
    Now 25.11-RC.
  • New PPPoE backend, some feedback

    269
    2
    0 Votes
    269 Posts
    86k Views
    P
    @stephenw10 I tried ppp-ipv6 pppoe0 up and it made no difference. In my case IPv6 works fine, its just the gateway monitoring doesn't go 'online', so I need to restart the Gateway service. IPv6 may continue to work in my case because the subnets are hard coded in the LAN pages, so configuration is manual of IPv6 addresses for each LAN, and the ISP just sends through anything in my /48. Hope that helps.
  • 0 Votes
    24 Posts
    4k Views
    H
    @IonutIT thanks
  • new if_pppoe Backend - getting HA/CARP to work like in MPD

    61
    1 Votes
    61 Posts
    12k Views
    w0wW
    New package for 25.11 is ready for testing. pkg add -f 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/woffko/pfSense-pppoe-ha/refs/heads/main/pfSense-pkg-pppoe-ha-0.1.3.pkg'
  • Intel Xeon D-2796NT and QAT

    19
    15
    0 Votes
    19 Posts
    3k Views
    stephenw10S
    Aha, nice!
  • pfsense 2.8.1 ISO

    Locked
    17
    0 Votes
    17 Posts
    12k Views
    stephenw10S
    Ok locking this, nothing useful happening here. For clarification there is no 2.8.1 ISO/Memstick image available and it's unlikely there will be. But that doesn't mean the situation won't ever change for future releases.
Copyright 2026 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.