Subcategories

  • Discussions about snapshots for pfSense Plus 25.11

    20 Topics
    140 Posts
    yon 0Y
    [image: 1763291180441-1000024572.jpg]
  • 25.11-BETA snapshots are now available

    Pinned Locked
    2
    4 Votes
    2 Posts
    918 Views
    M
    Now 25.11-BETA.
  • Update to pfSense packages with XMLRPC sync functionality

    Pinned
    8
    2 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    L
    @RobbieTT There isn’t an official guide for trimming pfSense boot times since most delays come from legacy compatibility layers and service startup waits. A practical starting point is looking through /boot/loader.conf and /boot/loader.conf.local. Things like long USB probe delays, console waits, and unused driver modules can often be disabled or shortened.
  • What skills are needed for Development

    Pinned
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    16k Views
    J
    @jits: It just dawned on me one morning in the shower that calculus is going to be the key to solving your future programming frustrations. You should try Lisp.
  • openvpn client dco connectivity issues @ 20250518113006_20250726122025

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    349 Views
    N
    @stephenw10 kvm creates a bridge making the physical lan card available to pfsense, other virtual machines, and the kvm host. Since this is a bridge to lan, other stations are also connected via physical ethernet So whatever is on physical network and is policy routed to ppp connection doesn't work. (but can ping) It works great if policy routed to dhcp/static wan connections. The policy is unanimous. all lan connected networks to ppp wan. Whatever comes from physical doesn't work. whatever comes from virtual machines bridged to the same vlan as pf lan interface works. as for dco, virtual machines connect via openvpn with dco enabled work fine, physicaly connected machines can only ping remote stations. all vlan configuration is done at the kvm and management switch level. pfsense is presented with different virtio interfaces. I have thought that it could be a mtu issue, however pinging with df flags reveals no issues too. (and dco can't be mtu too) Disabling dco, allows all machines to connect via the vpn (but doesn't solve the ppp wan issue)
  • New PPPoE backend, some feedback

    268
    2
    0 Votes
    268 Posts
    59k Views
    stephenw10S
    @Phil2025 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback: I will try the ppp-ipv6 pppoe0 up command next time rather than a gateway service restart. Hmm, yeah, that would be an interesting result if you can replicate it.
  • X-ray VPN implementation in future releases of pfSense+

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    3k Views
    stephenw10S
    I would first try to make it work in FreeBSD where the package exists.
  • 0 Votes
    24 Posts
    1k Views
    H
    @IonutIT thanks
  • new if_pppoe Backend - getting HA/CARP to work like in MPD

    61
    1 Votes
    61 Posts
    7k Views
    w0wW
    New package for 25.11 is ready for testing. pkg add -f 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/woffko/pfSense-pppoe-ha/refs/heads/main/pfSense-pkg-pppoe-ha-0.1.3.pkg'
  • Intel Xeon D-2796NT and QAT

    19
    15
    0 Votes
    19 Posts
    477 Views
    stephenw10S
    Aha, nice!
  • pfsense 2.8.1 ISO

    Locked
    17
    0 Votes
    17 Posts
    2k Views
    stephenw10S
    Ok locking this, nothing useful happening here. For clarification there is no 2.8.1 ISO/Memstick image available and it's unlikely there will be. But that doesn't mean the situation won't ever change for future releases.
  • How does one build 2.8.0 kernel with a patch applied to it?

    17
    1 Votes
    17 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    @bmeeks Yep, in this case I am just talking about the kernel source. The head for CE kernel is still public from what I can see, its for whatever reason the 2.8.0 and 2.8.1 branches are not.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    23 Views
    No one has replied
  • pfSense GUI search alpha version for testing

    20
    1
    1 Votes
    20 Posts
    2k Views
    patient0P
    @w0w thanx, now all typing-in works well and fast
  • How can I develop my own plugins?

    Moved
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    stephenw10S
    Also see: https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/development/develop-packages.html
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    201 Views
    stephenw10S
    Yup, seeing that here. Likely related to the upstream firmware API issue. But those drivers shouldn't need to load anything without the hardware present anyway.
  • [2.8.1.b] Multiple limiter issue

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    3k Views
    stephenw10S
    I suspect the root cause here is the same as this: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/15770
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    813 Views
    No one has replied
  • Shell scripts at /usr/local/etc/rc.d - when will they be executed?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    GertjanG
    @luckman212 I use a manually added FreeBSD package, 'munin' that came with a file to be placed in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ As per pfSense needs, I renamed it - added the .sh extension, and now the munin process get started at boot, and stopped at shutdown. I made this install many years ago, and as far as I know, the script only executes during boot and system shutdown. Not for network or other events etc. If FreeBSD would look like a Debian system (or clone) using init or systemd I could tell you way more, and I even think pfSEnse isn'tv really FreeBSD (no surprise, at it is, and it isn't ^^). Look at the kea script for an example, the first 3 / 4 lines. Afaik, pfSense it self, see here /etc/, all de rc...... files - for example rc.bootup - will all all these files. pfSense handle the hardware and software system events, and call whatever is needed, if system processes like 'unbound' needed to be restarted. So : and also during certain system events (e.g. interface link changes, IP address changes, and gateway events). never saw that happening with my own processes - as pfSense isn't really aware that these are running ones the system is up.
  • PfSense Github 2.8.0 branch

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    941 Views
    No one has replied
  • Pfsense Traffic Graphs

    Moved
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    stephenw10S
    Not currently, it would require some development.
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.