Building my pfSence Router - Please, Help chose the Hardware for my build - Thank You!

johnpoz

@aryeduino said in Building my pfSence Router - Please, Help chose the Hardware for my build - Thank You!:

can you please explain why?

Because freebsd wifi support is pretty much non existent - doesn't even support AC, let alone AX unless maybe there has been a some serious changes in 12.3 or 13 of freebsd?

Might be able to use it as a out of band connection to pfsense for your own use, or maybe as another wan connection in a failover scenario. But as AP for wifi clients - yeah not a good choice at all.

Aryeduino

@johnpoz Thanks
I do understand you mentioned AC and AX - what about N? I need it for the Lab connectivity for starts - can that be a good for N? I need if for Wifi not Wifi6 for now.
Regarding the FreeBSD - it will not be supporting Wifi6 at all? Does pfSence uses ONLY FreeBSD? I would be happy to learn. Thanks

AndyRH

I would say give it a try. If it meets your needs then you are done. If not then you can get a proper AP.

Aryeduino

@andyrh Thanks, good advice
Regarding the compatibility of the Motherboard with the intel 4NIC PCIe Card, would it be OK to get this Motherboard Gigabyte B560I AORUS PRO AX for the card? Thanks

AndyRH

It has a PCIe slot (16x) I do not see a reason it would not work. I have put 1x cards in 16x slots, it is designed to work just fine like that.

JKnott

@aryeduino

Most people would recommend a separate access point for WiFi.

Aryeduino

Thank you @andyrh

Aryeduino

@jknott Thanks
I do have more AP in my house, I just thought to have these two work as my Lab Connectivity of which does not need more then N :) Even if it has AX - i would be happy to have them working as my Lab AP rather then not using them at all - and maybe in the future they will support AX in pf Sence - that would be great.

johnpoz

@aryeduino said in Building my pfSence Router - Please, Help chose the Hardware for my build - Thank You!:

maybe in the future they will support AX in pf Sence - that would be great.

Don't hold your breath ;) heheheh

But sure if what your buying has wifi, and you have use in your "lab" and it works at N.. but I thought there was a thing were only 2.4 ghz? Or really limited support for chipsets and N? I doubt your latest and greatest wifi card had a driver to be honest - but maybe it it works?

Prob good place to read about freebsd wifi support or lack of it would be here

https://wiki.freebsd.org/WiFi

I wouldn't expect much from freebsd when it comes to wifi, now or even in the future - just not something they have ever really had much interest in.. And unless supported in freebsd, I don't see netgate/pfsense spending cycles on doing their own drivers, etc.

But if your expectations is slow wifi - then yeah you might be ok ;)

If your goal is wifi for your "lab" you would be much better off getting some 20$ wifi router and and just using it as AP for your lab.. I really wouldn't spend any cycles on trying to get wifi working on freebsd to be honest - cuz its just going to suck overall, even compared to some shit wifi router you had that you couldn't bring yourself to throw out ;)

Again - just curious, you don't have to answer but what is this budget at for all in for this box.. It has to be over what 6100 would cost.. Have you even looked at any of the netgate appliances?

stephenw10

An Atheros based 3x3:3 802.11N card is best you will do in current pfSense directly.
It works fine at 5GHz though. Check the Wireless section in the forum for suggestions.

Steve

Tzvia

I didn't see the use case for that machine... maybe I missed it.
I had gone down this road twice, a mini ITX box. No, scratch that, 3 times. The first was real budget, an AMD AM1 setup with the 5350 chip and MSI AM1M board. 300watt PSU (way overkill) 4 port intel server pull NIC from Amazon, 8 gigs ram. old laptop hard drive. Worked fine, but a bit slow saving changes in the GUI- anything actually that wrote to disk because of the disk. An SSD fixed that. Should have stopped there. But I ditched the little AMD that could, for a Kaby Lake I3 and Gigabyte board (H270N WIFI). It was snappier in the GUI but network wise, no difference. Not stopping there, I made that computer into my little kitchen computer as an excuse for a Pentium G 6400/Asrock B460M-ITX. Well, my mother's computer died so I repurposed that Asrock to her new desktop, and made a smart move. I got one of those Qotom-Q555G6, i5 7200, added 8 gigs ram and a 64 gig MSATA. Probably cheaper than what you are thinking about, would work as well, and with the money saved, buy a real WAP like a Ubiquity. In the end, you have a better setup- between the better WIFI and the low power silent mini PC with a very capable i5. They even have an i7 one if you need to service a small office full of people or have symmetrical gigabit that you will be maxing out constantly. So I had fallen down the rabbit hole, managed to recover, and am now in recovery and resisting the urge to waste money. Oh, put that NIC in your gaming rig or server in the home lab. Mine is in a box; I have a better one in my ESXI host... and that is another story...