Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Duplicate Rules Entries

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    13 Posts 3 Posters 1.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • johnpozJ
      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @robbwk
      last edited by

      @robbwk well one thing for sure you wouldn't want to use reject.. This sends a response..

      Why are you trying to reject them, default is deny - do you have port forwards open and your trying to stop them from getting to your port forward?

      Or mail server? I can not say I have ever seen such a thing.. My guess would be your browser is double submitting the rule?

      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • R
        robbwk
        last edited by

        I used Reject to try and impress on these folks that their Spam is not appreciated. I can easily change that to Deny. That isn't the point though. The double entry is the point.

        Yes, I am trying to protect mail servers. The amount of Spam I get is ridiculous and my storage system would be in serious trouble if I simply allowed all this rubbish to enter. I have SpamAssassin and Baysian on the mail servers but, that requires a lot of multiple entries to stop some Spammers that change IPs and domains by the minute. Stopping the IPs is my only effective solution. PFSense has reduced incoming by 75%. It's a great piece of software.

        All I am trying to do is figure out why I get two entries. The rest is irrelevant.

        Grateful for your reply.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          Are you running pfSense 2.6?

          Check the actual config file /conf/confg.xml and the generated rulset file /tmp/rules.debug. Do the duplicate entries appear there too or is this a display bug?

          Steve

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • R
            robbwk
            last edited by

            Hi and thanks for your attention and time.

            I'm running version 2.5.2. Are you suggesting that this version creates duplicate entries? I will upgrade, if you instruct.

            I'll check the config and ruleset as you suggest. I'll respond tomorrow with appropriate information.

            Thanks again for your advice and effort.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • R
              robbwk
              last edited by

              Decided to do it now. Files (sections of) attached.pfsense-config-xml.txt rule.debug.txt

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                Hmm so, yes, the rule is actually created twice. How exactly are you creating it?

                I only asked what version you're running because we need that to attempt to replicate it if it really is a bug. However it's unlikely a bug discovered in 2.5.2 will get fixed at this point. If you can replicate it in 2.6 then we can open a report and dig deeper.

                Steve

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • R
                  robbwk
                  last edited by robbwk

                  High Steve, appreciate your time.

                  I create the rule using the drop-down form (GUI). I do not use command line to do this. The choices are simple and I can't imagine I'm doing anything unusual.

                  I will upgrade to 2.6, later today and run it with few rules to start. Then, I will need to bring in the backup file from 2.5.2 or I will have to re-enter all the IPs and I don't really have that amount of time to spare.

                  Bear in mind that PFSense did not start out creating duplicates. For the first month or so, it created a single entry from my choices.

                  A little more information: I run the firewall as a VM in vSphere 6.7.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    Are you running as an HA pair? Or config syncing for any other reason?

                    It's hard to imagine anything that could cause that. 🤔

                    Since it's a VM you can easily snapshot it and roll back if upgrading to 2.6 makes no difference at least.

                    Steve

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • R
                      robbwk
                      last edited by

                      Hi Steven,

                      Thanks for your message.

                      I have updated the software to version 2.6. I removed the duplicates (which I could not do in 2.5 as if I deleted one, the other also disappeared). I have added a few test IPs and all seems to be okay.

                      For me, at least, 2.5 had a glitch. 2.6, appears to have resolved it.

                      I am grateful for the help and advice give on this forum. If anything goes south over the next few days, I'll report to you.

                      Robb

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        Ah, good to hear. 👍

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.