Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    VMware Workstation VMs Web Traffic Being Blocked

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    221 Posts 6 Posters 50.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DaddyGoD
      DaddyGo @dfinjr
      last edited by

      @dfinjr said in VMware Workstation VMs Web Traffic Being Blocked:

      However I am sad to say it is the same result.

      OMG.... this is get more interesting
      but I still say it's not pfSense that's doing this

      totally agree with John, but what makes this MTU value?

      Cats bury it so they can't see it!
      (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

      johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        Mmm, isn't that internal traffic to VMWare though? Is that actually failing?

        It looked like it was using standard sized frames for external connections previously. Though this absolutely does feel like an MTU issue.

        Steve

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @DaddyGo
          last edited by

          @daddygo said in VMware Workstation VMs Web Traffic Being Blocked:

          but I still say it's not pfSense that's doing this

          pfsense has ZERO to do with this that is for sure!! Pfsense has nothing to do with some client on the network putting odd ball sized frames on the wire.

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

          D DaddyGoD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            dfinjr @johnpoz
            last edited by

            To everyone here. I do have a Cisco packet capture from earlier this morning. Would that be neat to see? Traffic flows... No modification to VM at all.

            DaddyGoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DaddyGoD
              DaddyGo @johnpoz
              last edited by

              @johnpoz said in VMware Workstation VMs Web Traffic Being Blocked:

              pfsense has ZERO to do with this that is for sure!!

              Yup, but the OP came here because he thought it was a pfSense thing 😉

              the son of man is always learning, hihihi
              (this would be interesting to solve, it's probably just a banal problem)

              Cats bury it so they can't see it!
              (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

              johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DaddyGoD
                DaddyGo @dfinjr
                last edited by

                @dfinjr said in VMware Workstation VMs Web Traffic Being Blocked:

                To everyone here.

                I would go further by saying that the NAT solved the problem yesterday, here's where the dog will be buried

                Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @DaddyGo
                  last edited by johnpoz

                  @daddygo said in VMware Workstation VMs Web Traffic Being Blocked:

                  OP came here because he thought it was a pfSense thing

                  They always do - xyz doesn't work, must be pfsense ;) But a packet capture showing some odd ball frame size on some client being put on the wire sure has nothing to do with pfsense.

                  What version of vmware station is being used here? I find it hard to believe such an odd ball setup is default.. Someone prob tried setting jumbo frames at some point or time, and maybe their cisco was set for those which is why it so called worked..

                  1753 sure isn't even a normal jumbo size, or standard anything..

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                  D DaddyGoD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    dfinjr @johnpoz
                    last edited by

                    @johnpoz
                    Don't burn me at the stake already guys. Attached is the capture log from Cisco being the backbone for the same VMs. Traffic goes. Why would that be the case? Again please educate me :)precaptureoncisco.pcapng.gz

                    DaddyGoD johnpozJ stephenw10S 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DaddyGoD
                      DaddyGo @dfinjr
                      last edited by DaddyGo

                      @dfinjr said in VMware Workstation VMs Web Traffic Being Blocked:

                      Don't burn me at the stake already guys.

                      Don't take it to heart, we're just "moaning" a bit...😉

                      can we look at the case where you give DNS (Unbound) and DHCP to the VM out of the pfSense box?

                      • say from a single interface without VLAN(s)
                        (forget about pi, for a bit)

                      Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                      (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • johnpozJ
                        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @dfinjr
                        last edited by johnpoz

                        @dfinjr that is still all messed up! your seeing same frame sizes over the standard with a max of that 1753

                        frame.jpg

                        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DaddyGoD
                          DaddyGo @johnpoz
                          last edited by

                          @johnpoz said in VMware Workstation VMs Web Traffic Being Blocked:

                          What version of vmware station is being used here?

                          in principle VMware WS16PRO

                          Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                          (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                          D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • D
                            dfinjr @DaddyGo
                            last edited by

                            @daddygo
                            322a4891-c918-4172-a5fa-164a9337364d-image.png

                            DHCP now, same results

                            johnpozJ DaddyGoD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • johnpozJ
                              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @dfinjr
                              last edited by johnpoz

                              @dfinjr your actual vm has mtu set to 1500, so somewhere in the vmworksation switch or setting you have it borked up..

                              Someone at some time tried doing something with jumbo frames is my guess.. But that frame size isn't even a standard for jumbo or even baby giant frames which could be 1600.

                              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DaddyGoD
                                DaddyGo @dfinjr
                                last edited by DaddyGo

                                @dfinjr said in VMware Workstation VMs Web Traffic Being Blocked:

                                DHCP now, same results

                                To recap a bit, on anything that is VM related guest Linux/Windows this MTU sees, please do it a packet capture on an external physical machine

                                I ask, clean version of the WS16?
                                (only two can hear - :))

                                +++++edit:
                                what network card is in the machine running WS16?

                                +++edit2:
                                VMware HCL approved?

                                Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                                (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stephenw10S
                                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @dfinjr
                                  last edited by

                                  @dfinjr said in VMware Workstation VMs Web Traffic Being Blocked:

                                  Attached is the capture log from Cisco being the backbone for the same VMs

                                  That was actually taken on the Cisco?

                                  Yeah there are oversized frames there but all between 172.16.0.202 and 172.17.0.7. What are those things? I had assumed they are both inside VMWare. And also that 192.168.1.100 is?

                                  Steve

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • D
                                    dfinjr
                                    last edited by

                                    Ok I'm going to try and tag you all because I know you're all waiting on me at this point :)...

                                    @johnpoz
                                    I'm looking to see if there is something that I can configure in the virtual switch itself tied to VMware Workstation 16 Pro. I don't see specifics yet tied to MTU but so far just seeing some basic items such as host-only/NAT... items of the sort. I'm the only one using this environment for lab/demonstration purposes. If there was a jumbo frame it would of likely been me but most everything outside of standard static networking is pretty vanilla. Stock installs/stock configs. I don't know enough to get fancy.

                                    @DaddyGo
                                    I believe it is a clean install of WS16? What would make it not clean? :)
                                    Here is the card on the hosting system:
                                    4c7d77be-9800-488d-8170-04177261f361-image.png

                                    @stephenw10
                                    That packet capture was taken from the same 172.16.0.202 client but the network backbone being the Cisco ASA. Sorry I was very unclear with how I said that earlier.

                                    Those are likely packets for the management software I was talking about. I am a sales engineer for HCL BigFix. The frames you're seeing are likely my other subnet managed systems reaching back out to the 172.16.0.202 as it is my hosting server for BigFix. Not both inside of VMware, the only hosts inside of vmware are the 172.16.0.0/24 subnet, anything outside is physical systems as what would be happening from 172.17.0.0/24. Not sure on 192.168.1.100 at the moment I'll have to look into that. I have pfsense running on its default subnet of 192.168.1.0/24 so perhaps another systems is sitting there somewhere on that same subnet.

                                    To everyone: Why would the Cisco equipment flow this traffic no problem vs what is happening with PFSENSE? I am not trying to bash pfsense or anything I really want to use it. I am just saying what is the difference in the handling?

                                    Thanks!

                                    johnpozJ DaddyGoD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • johnpozJ
                                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @dfinjr
                                      last edited by johnpoz

                                      @dfinjr said in VMware Workstation VMs Web Traffic Being Blocked:

                                      so perhaps another systems is sitting there somewhere on that same subnet.

                                      You shouldn't see any packets... I see specific traffic from sent from 172.16.0.202 being sent to 192.168.1.100 in one of your sniffs. With a large frame size!

                                      Why would the Cisco equipment flow this traffic no problem vs what is happening with PFSENSE

                                      Maybe the interfaces on the cisco is set to allow jumbo.. Doesn't matter to be honest - putting frames on the wire at that size is BORKED!! They are not standard jumbo size, they are not any other size like baby giants, etc.. They seem to be just someone pulled out of then air and lets use 1753 as a mtu? The cisco sure didn't pass that traffic out to the internet with that frame size that is for sure..

                                      Trying to run a network with that odd ball frame size is going to cause you nothing but grief and issues..

                                      In the process of installing vmworkstation 16.2.2... This is the nic it created on my windows machine. You can see its not using jumbo and defaults to 1514.. What does your show?

                                      workstation.jpg

                                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                                      D 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • D
                                        dfinjr @johnpoz
                                        last edited by

                                        @johnpoz
                                        So I just figured it out, that .100 is a google wifi device feeding a handful of other clients. I didn't build that vlan on this build of the pfsense during my troubleshooting.

                                        I can go back to the Cisco device and see if it is configured to do that if you'd like. I don't believe I configured anything special on that device in terms of that either as I didn't really get into anything to do with Jumbo Packets before this conversation. Whatever is taking place now with PFSENSE that you're all seeing was taking place on the Cisco ASA. I am happy to provide whatever proof you all would like.

                                        @stephenw10 172.17.0.0/24 doesn't exist on PFSENSE however if you saw that packet capture from the Cisco ASA version that would be feeding the same google wifi. PFSENSE: google wifi is sitting at 192.168.1.100 vs Cisco at 172.17.0.7. I do have clients I am managing on the google wifi.

                                        @johnpoz said in VMware Workstation VMs Web Traffic Being Blocked:

                                        The cisco sure didn't pass that traffic out to the internet with that frame size that is for sure..

                                        Not sure what to tell you there :) What test would be handy for me to prove to you that it was happening? (not trying to be combative in anyway so please don't read that on that context but I believe I can prove it; this coming from the rather naive position that the traffic happens on Cisco so far no issue). Again my goal here is to retire and move to pfsense and I'm trying to make that feasible otherwise I wouldn't be spending time trying to fix it. I have only owned the hardware for 8 days counting today.

                                        johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • D
                                          dfinjr @johnpoz
                                          last edited by

                                          @johnpoz
                                          Just saw this one @johnpoz

                                          Here is what I see:
                                          f1a56644-b43c-408e-829e-3841dd62f3c0-image.png

                                          johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • johnpozJ
                                            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @dfinjr
                                            last edited by johnpoz

                                            @dfinjr said in VMware Workstation VMs Web Traffic Being Blocked:

                                            handy for me to prove to you that it was happening?

                                            Your isp connection sure didn't have a mtu size of 1753, so a routing device would/could fragment it down to correct mtu size the network its routing the packets over.

                                            Here i just setup ws16.2.2, out of the box setup.. Installed a VM (ubuntu)... Browsing amazon via nat interface.. the vm has a 192.168.37 IP from WS

                                            nat.jpg

                                            Sniffing - at my pfsense router, on the physical network... You can see all 1500 (1514) frames.. They are coming from my VM host IP 192.168.9.100, because the VM is using the natting workstation network.

                                            vmware.jpg

                                            You are going to have NOTHING but issues trying to use a frame size of some odd size like that.. Once go through a layer 3 router, the frame could be adjusted to the frame size on the transit network to get to the next hop, etc.. But even if that works, its problematic doing that! Now your router is spending all the time fragmenting up packets that are some odd ball size to the standard size.

                                            I do not know where it is happening (but sure isn't pfsense), but a 1753 (1767) frame size not standard for any ethernet network.

                                            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                                            D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.