Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    VMware Workstation VMs Web Traffic Being Blocked

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    221 Posts 6 Posters 61.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • johnpozJ
      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @dfinjr
      last edited by johnpoz

      @dfinjr you should remove whatever clamping mss you set.

      And then need to make sure you capture the syn and syn,ack of your connection. I looked back at old pcap you posted, but the one with the large 1753 mtu, the capture did not have the syn and syn,ack of the start of that conversation.

      On a normal 1500 mtu, when you do a ping with df bit set and size... you should be able to ping at 1472, while 1473 would fail... This has to do with overhead, etc We could have a class on frame size and what determines what in mtu, etc.. if need be..

      But why you set 1472 is the 28 bytes overhead, 8 Bytes for icmp, and 20 for IP.

      So for example... I can ping google with full 1472...

      $ ping -f -l 1472 www.google.com
      
      Pinging www.google.com [172.217.1.100] with 1472 bytes of data:
      Reply from 172.217.1.100: bytes=68 (sent 1472) time=15ms TTL=116
      Reply from 172.217.1.100: bytes=68 (sent 1472) time=14ms TTL=116
      Reply from 172.217.1.100: bytes=68 (sent 1472) time=11ms TTL=116
      Reply from 172.217.1.100: bytes=68 (sent 1472) time=12ms TTL=116
      
      Ping statistics for 172.217.1.100:
          Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
      Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
          Minimum = 11ms, Maximum = 15ms, Average = 13ms
      

      This means I have 1500 mtu all the way from my connection to them.

      If I try and send 1473.. It fails.

      $ ping -f -l 1473 www.google.com
      
      Pinging www.google.com [172.217.1.100] with 1473 bytes of data:
      Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set.
      Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set.
      Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set.
      Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set.
      
      Ping statistics for 172.217.1.100:
          Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
      

      So what specific site are you having issues with? For example I was using amazon.com to test because once you click into a category for something loads of pictures and such that generate large packets..

      So on one of these sites your having issues with - start ping at 1472 if fails drop it down until it passes..

      But from here for example I can ping amazon.com with 1472..

      $ ping -f -l 1472 www.amazon.com
      
      Pinging d3ag4hukkh62yn.cloudfront.net [52.84.54.224] with 1472 bytes of data:
      Reply from 52.84.54.224: bytes=1472 time=21ms TTL=234
      Reply from 52.84.54.224: bytes=1472 time=15ms TTL=234
      Reply from 52.84.54.224: bytes=1472 time=15ms TTL=234
      

      Problem is - you don't always know what your talking to - when you talk to www.amazon.com your going to be talking to multiple IPs.. sure images served up from 1 IP, scripts from another IP, etc. etc.. Most sites are no longer just 1 IP that handles everything being loaded from that site, etc.

      Same goes for speedtest.net - the website IP(s) is can promise you not the IP you actual IP your downloading or uploading too for the actual speedtest part..

      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        MSS only does anything to TCP so I would expect to be able to run that ping test with it still in place. But your network has shown....unexpected behaviour! So I would remove it to be sure.

        Steve

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          dfinjr
          last edited by

          @johnpoz
          Understood completely. Thank you for the detailed explanation that helped me a lot and thank you for the example. I am leaning on the system access at the moment but I think I'll be able to do that test here shortly. As for the primary sites I was having issues with originally, they were pfsense.org, speedtest.net and gmail.com.

          As soon as my system dependency frees up I'll perform that test and share the results.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            dfinjr
            last edited by

            Sorry for the delays everyone. I am working on shaking a moment free with work to do the tests. as soon as I do I will post them here.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              dfinjr
              last edited by

              @johnpoz

              Here are the pings you requested. No MSS is enabled and the websites are again failing to browse:

              aa8e0fc2-0080-411f-95df-e4076d8e43f7-image.png

              The specific sites that I had trouble with this time was speedtest.net and gmail.com. I used to have problems with pfsense.org but this time it loaded (not sure why, probably cached content or something).

              Test with gmail.com: (worked)
              65780504-f052-4c52-a0e6-5d20f01fa54e-image.png

              Test with speedtest.net: (timed out 1472)
              76de80b4-a511-4e35-a564-6e6108477f7b-image.png

              ...worked at 1434, going up...

              failed at 1454... (chose randomly)

              failed at 1444... (truncated till I found what did/didn't work)

              continued to work up to 1440 but failed at 1441:
              81bb10e6-b4e3-4c92-a052-bb6531f37c73-image.png

              Hope these ping tests tell you something @johnpoz @stephenw10

              Uploaded a failed capture again, longer one for 80+443 from the client that has been subject to this conversation most of this forum post (172.16.0.202). Here is the link for that again:
              https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/14C1MTTuwjUnvNYgDJfBy0gmiSQmO5HTQ?usp=sharing

              Again, sorry it has taken me so long to get you all this info work has been kicking my butt.

              Please let me know what you think and if there is any other testing you would like.

              Thanks again for the attention to this.

              johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • johnpozJ
                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @dfinjr
                last edited by johnpoz

                @dfinjr said in VMware Workstation VMs Web Traffic Being Blocked:

                Test with speedtest.net: (timed out 1472)

                Well you got something wrong with your isp or the path from your isp to them... Works just fine here

                ping.jpg

                What about loading www.speedtest.net - with packet capture so we can see what your syn and the answer syn,ack has in them.

                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  dfinjr @johnpoz
                  last edited by

                  @johnpoz

                  Sure would be happy to... Without MSS I am guessing?

                  johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • johnpozJ
                    johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @dfinjr
                    last edited by

                    @dfinjr example

                    mss.jpg

                    An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                    If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                    Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                    SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                    D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D
                      dfinjr @johnpoz
                      last edited by

                      @johnpoz
                      With MSS on:
                      f8b6525e-a723-41c4-91ec-016b3c60532d-image.png
                      MSS=1394

                      With MSS off:
                      13f70add-54cc-45be-a890-a43342f1cefa-image.png
                      MSS=1430

                      johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • johnpozJ
                        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @dfinjr
                        last edited by

                        @dfinjr where did you sniff that.. What are you looking at exactly for when you see 1430?

                        Which packet.. Where exactly did you set MSS - what interface?

                        How could the SYN that has not yet entered pfsense be changed?

                        Need to see the SYN that you send, and what the syn,ack says in response.

                        If I change the MSS on pfsense lan, to 1400, and do a sniff on lan, I still see 1460, if sniff on wan.. see 1360 (which is 40 minus what I set of 1400)

                        mssset.jpg

                        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                        D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          That looks like exactly like what he's seeing. The SYN goes out at 1460. The SYN-ACK comes back at 1430 or 1394 depening if MSS is set or not.

                          Really the only question I have here is why this is necessary. I expect path MTU to discover that if there really is a restriction somewhere.

                          Steve

                          johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • johnpozJ
                            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @stephenw10
                            last edited by johnpoz

                            @stephenw10 said in VMware Workstation VMs Web Traffic Being Blocked:

                            The SYN goes out at 1460

                            Where are you seeing that?

                            Oh I see it now in the info section.

                            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              Mmm, yeah if you look at the latest pcap and then look at, for example, tcp.stream eq 11.
                              You can see the syn-ack comes back with mss 1430 but it still fails. Whatever packets it's sending are not passed through VMWare.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • D
                                dfinjr @johnpoz
                                last edited by

                                @johnpoz

                                Hi there.

                                I did that sniff at 172.16.0.202. What I was looking for was the matching public IP address right at the beginning of the TCP conversation between me and speedtest.net. Pretty much client hello then looked for the [SYN, ACK] to see the options for that digging out that MSS. At that point though the server has already responded. I think I found what you are after though under the [SYN, ECN, CWR] where the client is outlining the MSS: (tell me if I am wrong)

                                e058f5a5-21ab-4cfd-afaa-d5c1bb884e4d-image.png

                                I just went through the capture from the no MSS setting and I don't even see that packet originating like what I saw in the screen shot directly above...

                                On the PFSENSE I honestly have set all my interfaces with the MSS setting at 1434 because then everything started playing ball again. So this would be existing on all interfaces.

                                Am I missing it or is the capture with MSS on not coming up with that packet as what I showed in the screen shot above from when MSS is enabled?

                                @stephenw10
                                I have no idea why it is necessary... that's why I am still here to try and figure it out :)

                                On you last commend I am kind of hanging on that. I am not modifying anything within the VMWare configuration at all, only MSS on the PFsense... But how is that possible? If the packets weren't getting out of VMWare then the changes in firewall wouldn't matter right? So why do they?

                                I obviously can't make sense of this yet...

                                stephenw10S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stephenw10S
                                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @dfinjr
                                  last edited by

                                  @dfinjr said in VMware Workstation VMs Web Traffic Being Blocked:

                                  If the packets weren't getting out of VMWare then the changes in firewall wouldn't matter right? So why do they?

                                  They do get out. But when they come back the large packets are not passed back to the VM by VMWare. The pcaps you ran on the host showed the reply packets arriving there but pcaps on the VM itself did not show them.
                                  I'm assuming that last pcap was on the VM?

                                  For example. Look at this tcp stream from packetcapture-5:
                                  Screenshot from 2022-03-17 22-45-07.png

                                  I wish I knew some better way to show that on the forum. Suggestions welcome!

                                  The client send mss 1460. The server responds 1430.
                                  But when the server uses 1430 (1484 total packet size) the client never sees it. It just sends a duplicate ACK.

                                  D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • D
                                    dfinjr @stephenw10
                                    last edited by

                                    @stephenw10
                                    Oh I see. Yep PCAP was on the VM (172.16.0.202).

                                    Yep I don't get it. I see what you're saying and all just can't wrap my head around what is going on here.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • M
                                      mikerobert789
                                      last edited by

                                      This post is deleted!
                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.