Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Outgoing to 8443

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    16 Posts 3 Posters 1.9k Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S Offline
      sasa1 @johnpoz
      last edited by sasa1

      @johnpoz actually there was a block related to the public IP address of origin, the remote vpn manager has removed this block and now you can access the web page without problems.
      Unfortunately, however, there is a problem with this PC that is behind pfsense, in practice after it has connected to the remote vpn it can no longer access this server from the outside, through a NAT.
      I checked and the private IP that is assigned by the remote vpn is on a different class than the one assigned to the server locally.
      After establishing the vpn connection, the default gateway is changed and consequently the pc no longer passes through the pfsense gateway
      if the server doesn't switch to pfsense then everything works.
      Thanks.

      johnpozJ stephenw10S 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ Offline
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @sasa1
        last edited by

        @sasa1 well I can still not get to it..

        As to some pc behind pfsense doing vpn - what does that have to do with pfsense. Just like this didn't have anything to do with pfsense..

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S Online
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @sasa1
          last edited by

          @sasa1 said in Outgoing to 8443:

          after it has connected to the remote vpn it can no longer access this server from the outside, through a NAT.

          What server exactly?

          Does that mean it can still access it via the VPN using an internal address?

          But, yeah, pfSense would not be doing anything there. If the client sends all of it's traffic over a VPN pfSense only sees the VPN.

          Steve

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S Offline
            sasa1
            last edited by

            Hi,
            the problem is that after connecting in VPN my server "loses" the gateway that refers to pfsense and consequently the NAT (which I did to access the server from the outside) no longer works.

            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S Online
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              Oh, you mean like NAT reflection?

              So what happens when you try to connect to it with the VPN active?

              S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S Offline
                sasa1 @sasa1
                last edited by

                @sasa1 it happens that the PC (behind pfsense) uses as gateway the IP address assigned to it by the remote vpn server

                but with pfSense is there the possibility of doing a site-to-site vpn (which is not with IPSec) to make sure that my network (the one behind pfsense) and the remote one are in communication?
                Thanks

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S Offline
                  sasa1 @stephenw10
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10 if on my pfsense I make a vpn with the L2TP server can I make sure that the remote client accesses my server that is in the l2tp vpn?
                  thanks

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S Online
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    It's possible to use L2TP over IPSec but it's generally preferable to use either IPSec directly or OpenVPN.

                    I'm still not 100% sure what the actual issue is here. Directly connected subnets should still be available to a VPN client. If not then change the client or server settings so it isn't routing all traffic over the VPN.

                    Steve

                    S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S Offline
                      sasa1 @stephenw10
                      last edited by

                      @stephenw10 if in pfsene I configure a l2tp vpn server can this vpn be bi-directional?

                      ie my PC behind pfsense (l2tp server) can access the remote network and at the same time the remote l2tp client can access my pc?
                      thanks.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S Online
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        l2tp/ipsec is mostly used for client-to-site type setups so would probably not be suitable. You would want to use a site-to-site VPN like IPSec or OpenVPN.

                        Can you give us a diagram of what you need to achieve?

                        Steve

                        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S Offline
                          sasa1 @stephenw10
                          last edited by

                          @stephenw10 Isn't an VPN Openswan-based also client-to-site?

                          or with openswan you can also make a site-to-site vpn?
                          Thanks.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stephenw10S Online
                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                            last edited by

                            OpenVPN can be configured as either.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.