How to get pfSense WAN to accept VLAN 0

dayneparrott · Feb 25, 2022, 6:09 PM

@stephenw10 I am relatively sure. Everyone else appears to be doing the same thing with Netgraph and it works fine for them. The NIC does see the module, the odd DHCP request goes out
12:08:03.056513 IP (tos 0x10, ttl 128, id 0, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), le ngth 328)
0.0.0.0.bootpc > 255.255.255.255.bootps: [udp sum ok] BOOTP/DHCP, Request from a0:4 8:1c:66:41:00 (oui Unknown), length 300, xid 0x4eda3653, Flags [none] (0x0000)
Client-Ethernet-Address a0:48:1c:66:41:00 (oui Unknown)
Vendor-rfc1048 Extensions
Magic Cookie 0x63825363
DHCP-Message Option 53, length 1: Discover
Client-ID Option 61, length 7: ether a0:48:1c:66:41:00
Hostname Option 12, length 7: "pfSense"
Parameter-Request Option 55, length 10:
Subnet-Mask, BR, Time-Zone, Classless-Static-Route
Default-Gateway, Domain-Name, Domain-Name-Server, Hostname
Option 119, MTU

It never acquires anything.

And yeah the lights do blink when traffic is being sent

dayneparrott · Feb 25, 2022, 6:26 PM

This post is deleted!

stephenw10 · Feb 26, 2022, 12:52 AM

What are you capturing on there? I would want to see the VLAN 0 tagged packet. Like here for vlan 42:

00:50:32.646411 00:90:0b:76:8e:55 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype 802.1Q (0x8100), length 346: vlan 42, p 0, ethertype IPv4, (tos 0x10, ttl 128, id 0, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 328)
    0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: [udp sum ok] BOOTP/DHCP, Request from 00:90:0b:76:8e:55, length 300, xid 0x3a52ef60, secs 7, Flags [none] (0x0000)
	  Client-Ethernet-Address 00:90:0b:76:8e:55
	  Vendor-rfc1048 Extensions
	    Magic Cookie 0x63825363
	    DHCP-Message Option 53, length 1: Discover
	    Client-ID Option 61, length 7: ether 00:90:0b:76:8e:55
	    Hostname Option 12, length 4: "5100"
	    Parameter-Request Option 55, length 10: 
	      Subnet-Mask, BR, Time-Zone, Classless-Static-Route
	      Default-Gateway, Domain-Name, Domain-Name-Server, Hostname
	      Option 119, MTU

Steve

dayneparrott · Mar 31, 2022, 2:34 AM

@stephenw10 It shows the packet, it isn’t tagged by vlan0 though, I just installed 2.5.2, previous tcpdump was from 2.4.4, I’ll see what it’s doing later today. I don’t think it’s the NIC as I have tried a whole plethora of devices, none of which will pull an IP via DHCP. Before having bellmts come by to replace the Nokia ont with an SFP module, itd link up and assign my win10 desktop a dynamic 207.x.x.x IP. It links, doesn’t pull an IP, I am so stumped. Offering .2 ETH to anyone who can help me get this working.

stephenw10 · Feb 26, 2022, 2:11 PM

How do you have the script configured?

What interface are you running that capture on? It has to be the parent interface.

Steve

natbart · Mar 31, 2022, 2:23 AM

@mikela - sorry I got my pfsense setup and it has been cruzing ever since.

I used the earlyshellcmd

natbart · Mar 31, 2022, 2:34 AM

@dayneparrott do you have a service higher than 1gb. I think the Bell MTS design is different for 1gb+

I have 1Gb and for this and lower speeds the ONT stays in place and the HH3000 is removed.

With >1GB i dont think they use the ONT and add a Fiber SFP module right into the HH3000. Are you putting the SFP in to your pfSense box?

natbart · Mar 31, 2022, 2:39 AM

I am currently still on 2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64), am I safe to do an in place upgrade to 2.5.2?

Can I upgrade with packages still installed and not break anything. Asking in this space just because i dont want it to break this functionality of course.

stephenw10 · Apr 4, 2022, 3:14 PM

2.5.2 should be fine. The igb driver in 2.6 does not pass VLAN0 correctly. That should now be fixed in 2.7 snapshots though, we are waiting for feedback on that.

Steve

cucu007 · Apr 4, 2022, 3:10 PM

I had my pfsense running 2.6 working flawless for a bit then I switch from xfinity to frontier fiber then all hell broke loose. After much research and testing I had no choice bu to roll things back to 2.5.2 and apply the vlan script fix, which so far is working fine. Is there an ETA for getting this bug fix in an upcoming release for 2.6 or will this have to wait for 2.7?

Also, are there any plans to update the vlan script to make it comaptible with release 2.6? Please advise.

cucu007 · Apr 4, 2022, 3:14 PM

@stephenw10 I tried running the latest 04/03 snapshot for 2.7 and it doesnt seem to work either, had no choice but to rollback to 2.5.2 to get my internet up and running, it was a bad weekend to say the least getting this VLAN 0 issue sorted.

stephenw10 · Apr 4, 2022, 4:43 PM

Hmm, the fix for the known issue in e1000 should now be in 2.7 snapshots:
https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-src/commit/9c762cc125c0c2dae9fbf49cc526bb97c14b54a4

If you're sure you were running a snap with that in that might not be the issue after all.

Try running a pcap to see the tagged traffic.

Steve

cucu007 · Apr 4, 2022, 6:03 PM

@stephenw10 I was running the latest development SS as of Saturday and it didnt work. So I opted to rollback to 2.5.2 and apply the VLAN script fix, so far is working. Do you happen to now if the script will soon be modify to accommodate release 2.6, I like to stay ahead rather than behind :-)

stephenw10 · Apr 4, 2022, 6:24 PM

The script itself should be fine in 2.6 or 2.7. The issue is the e1000 driver which incorrectly handles VLAN0 from what I can see.

To be clear you applied the script in 2.7 and it failed? Did it show any errors?

Steve

cucu007 · Apr 5, 2022, 4:08 AM

@stephenw10 it just didnt work, I give up on it, didnt even check the logs.

I am on 2.5.2 and is working, but my downloads is now slow. I am using frontier fiber. Did you get the script working on 2.6?

stephenw10 · Apr 5, 2022, 10:43 AM

I personally don't use it. My ISP doesn't require priority tagging.

The script works fine in 2.6 as long as you don't have an Intel e1000 NIC as I understand it.

Steve

c45p32 · Apr 5, 2022, 2:41 PM

I can confirm that with fix https://github.com/MonkWho/pfatt/issues/67#issuecomment-1043358822 on 2.6.0 works perfect. I haven't had any issues. My backup router has em drivers and I haven't had time to test that out yet on 2.7.0.

cucu007 · Apr 8, 2022, 2:47 PM

@c45p32 said in How to get pfSense WAN to accept VLAN 0:

I can confirm that with fix https://github.com/MonkWho/pfatt/issues/67#issuecomment-1043358822 on 2.6.0 works perfect. I haven't had any issues. My backup router has em drivers and I haven't had time to test that out yet on 2.7.0.

I am planning to do some testing this weekend with 2.6.0. My internet was down for two days, so I opted to bring back my old router running openWRT and so far is working flawless, but if at all possible I would like to go back to pfSence since is my favorite!

Any ideas of what the 2.7.0 roadmap looks like in terms of release? Any potential tentatrrive dates?

stephenw10 · Apr 8, 2022, 5:53 PM

No, there's no schedule for a 2.7 release yet.

22.05 is targeted at May obviously. That also contains the same fix. Assuming that fixes it.

cucu007 · Apr 10, 2022, 4:27 AM

I tried again today, doesnt work....I tried uploading both em and igb even when I only needed igb. I follow the instructions by the book in the post you reference, it looks like this remains broken as of 2.6.0. Going back to OpenWRT until this is sorted out correctly, will miss my pfSense box. ;-(

Please consider integrating this fix into the high priority list as it impact all AT&T and Frontier fiber customers. Thank you all for the good intentions. Shame on the ISPs for doing this vlan 0 tagging.