Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Ipsec Configuration not Working!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPsec
    66 Posts 6 Posters 15.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • I
      ibnkamala @rcoleman-netgate
      last edited by ibnkamala

      @rcoleman-netgate and this is the other side's version
      edc77e22-ef16-4252-b782-47ba35655a06-image.png

      And some logs:

      Jun 7 18:55:06

      charon

      38100

      11[CFG] vici client 825 connected

      Jun 7 18:55:06

      charon

      38100

      14[CFG] vici client 825 registered for: list-sa

      Jun 7 18:55:06

      charon

      38100

      14[CFG] vici client 825 requests: list-sas

      Jun 7 18:55:06

      charon

      38100

      11[CFG] vici client 825 disconnected

      Jun 7 18:55:08

      charon

      38100

      15[IKE] <con1|6> retransmit 3 of request with message ID 0

      Jun 7 18:55:08

      charon

      38100

      15[NET] <con1|6> sending packet: from 192.168.1.27[500] to remote-public-ip[500] (304 bytes)

      Jun 7 18:55:12

      charon

      38100

      15[CFG] vici client 826 connected

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • I
        ibnkamala @rcoleman-netgate
        last edited by

        @rcoleman-netgate since I am not very strong on how to read the logs and understand what is wrong, could you please help me on that?

        concerning the version is that mean I must have same version on both sides?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • I
          ibnkamala
          last edited by

          This post is deleted!
          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • I
            ibnkamala
            last edited by

            Anyone can help me please, I am 100% sure that use in both sides IKEv2, simplest PSK which is "123" and everything is matched but still I am not able to establish the connection?!!!

            Jun 10 11:57:55 charon 08[IKE] <con2000|146> IKE_SA con2000[146] state change: CONNECTING => DESTROYING
            Jun 10 11:57:55 charon 08[CHD] <con2000|146> CHILD_SA con2000{165} state change: CREATED => DESTROYING
            Jun 10 11:57:55 charon 08[IKE] <con2000|146> received AUTHENTICATION_FAILED notify error
            Jun 10 11:57:55 charon 08[ENC] <con2000|146> parsed IKE_AUTH response 1 [ N(AUTH_FAILED) ]

            Any help would be really appreciated :)

            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              SteveITS Galactic Empire @ibnkamala
              last edited by

              @ibnkamala I don't have direct advice for you but note 2.6 made several changes to IPSec, did you review those?

              Possibly, upgrade the 2.4.5 which is a few versions old?

              Pre-2.7.2/23.09: Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
              When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to restart, or more depending on packages and device speed.
              Upvote 👍 helpful posts!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • G
                gabacho4 Rebel Alliance
                last edited by

                Would be super helpful if you would show screenshots of the P1 and P2 settings for both sides. And while you’re at it, update the 2.4.5 box. Not really interested in trying to troubleshoot an unsupported version of pfsense.

                I 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • I
                  ibnkamala @gabacho4
                  last edited by

                  @gabacho4 thanks for your reply I am going to share both sites configurations and here is the screenshot when I try to connect the tunnel.

                  SIte-A-phases.png SIte-A.png
                  SiteB.png

                  Thanks for your help, for sure I am going to update to a newer version but I wanted to test it first.

                  G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • G
                    gabacho4 Rebel Alliance @ibnkamala
                    last edited by

                    @ibnkamala those are not the p1 and p2 settings. What you’ve sent is a screenshot of the ipsec status. It tells me nothing other than the fact that your IPSec connection isn’t working which has already been established by your other posts. Please send screenshots of the actual p1 and p2 configurations for both sides of the tunnel. Those are what you configured when you went to VPN - IPSec and then created the p1 and p2.

                    I 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • I
                      ibnkamala @gabacho4
                      last edited by ibnkamala

                      @gabacho4 I am sorry, here are phase 1 and 2 configs for siteA:

                      Phase 1:
                      1.png
                      2.png 3.png 4.png

                      Phase 2
                      phase2-1.png phase2-2.png phase2-3.png

                      G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • G
                        gabacho4 Rebel Alliance @ibnkamala
                        last edited by

                        @ibnkamala you’re killing me bro. And what about side B?! I need both sides to compare. Come on.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • I
                          ibnkamala
                          last edited by

                          here are phase 1 and 2 configs for siteB:
                          Phase 1:
                          1.png 2.png 3.png 4.png

                          Phase 2

                          Phase2-1.png Phase2-2.png Phase2-3.png

                          Thanks a lot for your help

                          G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • G
                            gabacho4 Rebel Alliance @ibnkamala
                            last edited by gabacho4

                            @ibnkamala ok so one side is behind NAT if I recall right. Try this. For the “my identifier” and “peer identifier” change from IP address to KeyID tag for both. Then make the id for the local router “SideA” and the remote “SideB”. On the remote side make the my identifier “SideB” and the peer identifier “SideA”. Be sure to change the other side to use KeyID tag as well of course.

                            I 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • I
                              ibnkamala @gabacho4
                              last edited by

                              @gabacho4 both sides are behind the NAT

                              G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • G
                                gabacho4 Rebel Alliance @ibnkamala
                                last edited by

                                @ibnkamala ok. Make those changes. Also you’re positive that the routers in front of the pfsense boxes allows IPSec pass through?

                                I G 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • I
                                  ibnkamala @gabacho4
                                  last edited by

                                  @gabacho4 in both side routers IPsec is allowed to pass through,
                                  Could you please tell me, what do you mean by "Then make the id for the local router “SideA” and the remote “SideB""?

                                  I really appreciate you great help

                                  G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • G
                                    gabacho4 Rebel Alliance @gabacho4
                                    last edited by

                                    Also, just to emphasize, you really need to update the other side to pfsense 2.6.0. The IPSec settings and configuration between 2.4.5 and 2.6 have changed. It’s possible this will never work until you update.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • G
                                      gabacho4 Rebel Alliance @ibnkamala
                                      last edited by

                                      @ibnkamala said in Ipsec Configuration not Working!:

                                      @gabacho4 in both side routers IPsec is allowed to pass through,
                                      Could you please tell me, what do you mean by "Then make the id for the local router “SideA” and the remote “SideB""?

                                      I really appreciate you great help

                                      Under:

                                      Phase 1 Proposal (Authentication) - change My Identifier to KeyID tag from My IP Address. Also change the Peer identifier to KeyID. Make My identifier KeyID tag value SiteA and peer identifier KeyID tag value SiteB. Then do the same thing on the other router except the My identifier will be SiteB and the peer will be SiteA

                                      I 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • I
                                        ibnkamala @gabacho4
                                        last edited by

                                        @gabacho4 is this correct?
                                        siteA-KeyTag.png siteB-KeyTag.png

                                        G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • G
                                          gabacho4 Rebel Alliance @ibnkamala
                                          last edited by gabacho4

                                          @ibnkamala almost. Don't use the public IP. Literally just put SiteA and SiteB on the local machine and SiteB and SiteA on the remote one.

                                          98e868de-7e87-4fce-9227-7e598f513878-image.png

                                          I G 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • I
                                            ibnkamala @gabacho4
                                            last edited by ibnkamala

                                            @gabacho4 still not working,

                                            siteA KeyTag values.png siteB-KeyTag values.png

                                            For more information I am already having a tunnel active on Pfsense 2.4.5 as we can see in the below photo!
                                            established.png

                                            G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.