Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    22.05-RC high CPU load

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Plus 22.05 Development Snapshots (Retired)
    20 Posts 5 Posters 3.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R
      renegade
      last edited by

      After upgrading to 22.05 my cpu is constantly above 1.00 load and gets very warm. Yesterday evening it was above 2.00 and got so hot that the CPU turnend off.
      In 22.01 load was 0.05 - 0.10.
      On ssh the highest process is php_pfb with around 5%.

      Can I switch back to 22.01 with the new boot environment feature?

      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        MoonKnight @renegade
        last edited by

        @renegade
        Hi I don't see that problem here after upgrading to 22.05 RC.

        aee63e0f-48f0-4cbc-8214-c41425522113-image.png

        --- 24.11 ---
        Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1518 @ 2.20GHz
        Kingston DDR4 2666MHz 16GB ECC
        2 x HyperX Fury SSD 120GB (ZFS-mirror)
        2 x Intel i210 (ports)
        4 x Intel i350 (ports)

        R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R
          renegade @MoonKnight
          last edited by

          Thanks for the feedback.

          I have upgraded on Thursday.
          This is how it look like.

          95baca15-3350-4643-876d-dc4428c07a28-image.png

          There is a high increase on CPU.

          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            MoonKnight @renegade
            last edited by

            @renegade
            hmm interesting, did you reboot your firewall after the updating to 22.05 RC?
            What packages have you installed?

            --- 24.11 ---
            Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1518 @ 2.20GHz
            Kingston DDR4 2666MHz 16GB ECC
            2 x HyperX Fury SSD 120GB (ZFS-mirror)
            2 x Intel i210 (ports)
            4 x Intel i350 (ports)

            R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • R
              renegade @MoonKnight
              last edited by renegade

              @moonknight
              pfblocker. And it seems to be the same issue as described in 3-1-0-4-high-cpu-load
              I killed the php_pfb task and cpu load dropped down to 0.02 as before.

              I had no issues with pfblocker in 22.05

              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                MoonKnight @renegade
                last edited by

                @renegade
                Did you try to reinstall pfBlockerNG-Dev?

                I'm running pfBlockerNG-Dev, never seen as high CPU usage as you have.
                And I'm running other packages also.

                --- 24.11 ---
                Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1518 @ 2.20GHz
                Kingston DDR4 2666MHz 16GB ECC
                2 x HyperX Fury SSD 120GB (ZFS-mirror)
                2 x Intel i210 (ports)
                4 x Intel i350 (ports)

                R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • R
                  renegade @MoonKnight
                  last edited by

                  @moonknight
                  Yes, I did and no change unfortunately.
                  I now deactivated the services.
                  When the final arrives, I will make a clean install I guess.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    @renegade said in 22.05-RC high CPU load:

                    got so hot that the CPU turnend off

                    That should not be possible. You should be able to run the CPU 100% without running into thermal shutdown. If you can't then I suggest checking and/or improving your cooling solution.

                    I have one system here running pfBlocker that behaves like that. After some minutes (not immediately) one CPU core get stuck at 100% until pfBlocker is disabled. Is that what you're seeing?

                    Steve

                    R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R
                      renegade @stephenw10
                      last edited by

                      @stephenw10
                      Yeah, you are right. I have to improve that. Unfortunately the device is in a quite warm environment.

                      And yes, that's what I can see on my installation. Same behaviour.
                      thanks for confirming, Steven.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • dennypageD
                        dennypage
                        last edited by

                        FWIW, I've seen similar.

                        Screen Shot 2022-06-12 at 10.16.33.png

                        Hasn't resulted in a problem though.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          Also running pfBlocker? Does it start after some time, not immediately?

                          dennypageD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • dennypageD
                            dennypage @stephenw10
                            last edited by

                            @stephenw10 Yes, running pfBlockerNG-devel.

                            At first I thought I noticed that it didn't start right after boot, but I didn't investigate sufficiently.

                            I just rebooted and checked carefully, and you are right, CPU starts ramping up approximately 2 minutes after boot is complete.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • dennypageD
                              dennypage @stephenw10
                              last edited by

                              @stephenw10 Without rebooting, stopping the pfb_filter returns the cpu to normal levels.

                              Restarting pfb_filter cause cpu to return to higher levels after approximately 2 minutes and 30 seconds..

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • R
                                renegade
                                last edited by

                                I noticed that there is a new Snapshot version of the 22.05 RC this morning.
                                Is it fixed already? Or has pfblocker maybe to fix it?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stephenw10S
                                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                  last edited by

                                  It is not fixed as far as I know. Tracking it here: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/13154

                                  Add any additional details you may uncover there.

                                  Steve

                                  dennypageD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • dennypageD
                                    dennypage @stephenw10
                                    last edited by

                                    @stephenw10, I've updated the redmine issue with a temporary fix. I make no representation that this fix is the best approach. 🤠

                                    @BBcan177, please take a look. Thanks.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                    • stephenw10S
                                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                      last edited by

                                      Nice. Looks like work is already in progress here: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/13156

                                      dennypageD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • dennypageD
                                        dennypage @stephenw10
                                        last edited by

                                        @stephenw10 Well shucks. Seeing that would have saved me a bunch of work. I guess I need to spend more time spelunking redmine.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stephenw10S
                                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                          last edited by

                                          Yup I missed that too. Or at least I failed to realise the root cause was the same.

                                          Still when you independently come up with the same fix that's always a good sign. 😉

                                          Working for me here on 2.7.

                                          Steve

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • dennypageD dennypage referenced this topic on
                                          • D
                                            drewsaur
                                            last edited by drewsaur

                                            Thank you all and @BBcan177 for the simple patch, because I was about to make a long post looking for help, and the little edit to line 4139 solved my CPU load issues with 22.05 completely.

                                            I think this fix should be made more prominent - I am not using a 22.05 development snapshot, but rather 22.05 final, and I found this thread via a search and not via a browse of the forums. I feel lucky to have found it.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • D drewsaur referenced this topic on
                                            • D drewsaur referenced this topic on
                                            • D drewsaur referenced this topic on
                                            • D drewsaur referenced this topic on
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.