Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Netgate 3100 unable to saturate gigabit WAN

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Official Netgate® Hardware
    11 Posts 3 Posters 1.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R
      rcoleman-netgate Netgate @njacobs
      last edited by rcoleman-netgate

      @njacobs Back up the config, reset to default, configure a single network (default LAN is fine for this, in fact ideal) and see if the speed remains.

      If the speed gets back closer to 900-950 then it's the config you're running that's shaving off overhead.

      Ryan
      Repeat, after me: MESH IS THE DEVIL! MESH IS THE DEVIL!
      Requesting firmware for your Netgate device? https://go.netgate.com
      Switching: Mikrotik, Netgear, Extreme
      Wireless: Aruba, Ubiquiti

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        You are probably just seeing the PPPoE overhead there though. You are hitting a CPU limit on one core there. The normal PPPoE restrictions don't really apply on the 3100 because it doesn't use multi-queue NICs anyway. However there is still overhead because PPPoE using netgraph and all traffic has to go through it. The SG-3100 is capable of Gigabit throughput with that but will be reduced with PPPoE.

        Steve

        N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • N
          njacobs @stephenw10
          last edited by njacobs

          @stephenw10 Forgive my ignorance, but if it's PPPoE overhead wouldn't I see similar speeds with the ONT connected directly to my host machine? Or are you saying it's the overhead that's maxing the CPU?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Yes, the CPU overhead. All traffic has to pass through netgraph and the single CPU core has to do that.

            Steve

            N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • N
              njacobs @stephenw10
              last edited by

              @stephenw10 Thanks for the clarification.

              I'll certainly test after a reset to default, but I do want the ability to run with my current configuration. Can I expect a 4100 to achieve gigabit WAN speeds with PPPoE?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                Yes, or very close to it. See:
                https://forum.netgate.com/topic/172448/1g-pppoe-cpu-bottleneck-on-3100

                Steve

                N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • N
                  njacobs @stephenw10
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10 Thanks for that, really helpful.

                  Before upgrading to a 4100 (or dare I say it, a 6100...) I thought I'd try offloading the PPPoE work to my ISP supplied router by using it as a gateway in front of the 3100. With this configuration I'm now seeing ~800-850 Mbps with CPU load peaking ~84%.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    That sounds about right. It will pass 1G given the latency and traffic but a bit less than that in real conditions is expected.

                    Steve

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • N njacobs referenced this topic on
                    • N
                      njacobs
                      last edited by

                      Just sharing that I upgraded to a 6100 and the results were disappointing. I've started a new thread rather than continue this one.

                      Nathan

                      N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • N
                        njacobs @njacobs
                        last edited by

                        Resolved.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.