Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Odd internet slowness with Netgear GS324TP Switch

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    60 Posts 5 Posters 10.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      Jarhead @CreationGuy
      last edited by

      @creationguy Try them both instead of the dual nic.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        What NIC types do you have available?

        To create that sort of slowness I'd expect so see a lot of errors/collisions in Status > Interfaces.

        Otherwise maybe some IP conflict? I would expect to see errors logged.

        I would avoid using VLAN1 tagged if at all possible. Most switches use that as the native internal VLAN and can end up doing odd things with it.
        For similar reasons it is better to avoid tagged and untagged traffic on the same link. Though that should work fine and isn't a FreeBSD or switch issue but using it invites user error generated problems. It's far easier to accidentally configure a port/device to strip the tags than to put something tagged on the wrong VLAN. If the pfSense interface connected to that is just dropping untagged traffic that's no issue. But if it is you can end up with unexpected traffic on an interface.

        Steve

        johnpozJ CreationGuyC 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @stephenw10
          last edited by

          @stephenw10 said in Odd internet slowness with Netgear GS324TP Switch:

          invites user error generated problems

          That I would concur with for sure.. Tagged an Untagged seem to be a point of confusion for new users to vlans.. Mixing them could lead to error sure..

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Mmm, and even if you understand what you're doing assume the next guy might not! 😉

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • CreationGuyC
              CreationGuy @stephenw10
              last edited by CreationGuy

              @stephenw10 @Jarhead
              I plugged in a USB Ethernet, pfsense shows that it's at 1000Mb/Full, 0 collisions. Zero collisions for all interfaces. The transfer speed is about 12-13MB per sec. Both desktops are connected at 1000/Full. No pfsense rules.

              I have not yet tried removing the DUAL NIC, that is next.

              Edit; I plugged in another USB to Ethernet, set up a vlan for that one as well, so Desktop to Desktop are avoiding the Dual NIC and speeds are still 13MB/s.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                Still going through the switch though?

                CreationGuyC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • CreationGuyC
                  CreationGuy @stephenw10
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10 @Jarhead
                  I removed the Dual NIC (Supermicro AOC-SG-i2) and enabled the onboard 1GbE and installed a USB 3 1GbE. I configured the interfaces with the correct VLANs.

                  Transfer speeds are much faster, 77MB/S which is about 600Mb/s. It's WAY faster now, so it's something with this NIC. I thought that it was an Intel chipset but it's not. That solves that one....

                  I wanted to make sure that my rules all set.VLAN.JPG
                  Screenshot 2022-07-27 at 22-33-08 TheWall.jrfam.lan - Firewall Rules CORE.png Screenshot 2022-07-27 at 22-32-58 TheWall.jrfam.lan - Firewall Rules GUEST.png Screenshot 2022-07-27 at 22-32-51 TheWall.jrfam.lan - Firewall Rules CAMLAN.png Screenshot 2022-07-27 at 22-32-43 TheWall.jrfam.lan - Firewall Rules LAN.png

                  Thank you again!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    That NIC should be an Intel chipset. How did the interfaces appear in pfSense?

                    Just by having it unused in the system other traffic was slow? That's very odd behaviour.

                    The 'Block Guest to LAN' rule you have on LAN can never match anything. Traffic with source 'Guest net' should never come into the LAN.

                    Steve

                    CreationGuyC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • CreationGuyC
                      CreationGuy @stephenw10
                      last edited by

                      @stephenw10 said in Odd internet slowness with Netgear GS324TP Switch:

                      That NIC should be an Intel chipset. How did the interfaces appear in pfSense?

                      Just by having it unused in the system other traffic was slow? That's very odd behaviour.

                      The 'Block Guest to LAN' rule you have on LAN can never match anything. Traffic with source 'Guest net' should never come into the LAN.

                      Steve

                      The Dual NIC chipset was my mistake, I assumed it was by looking at it. It's removed now. I was using it prior to yesterday for testing- that was the odd cause of the inter-vlan slowness.

                      I was wondering if that LAN rule was off; other than that, it looks fine?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        Yes, looks reasonable otherwise.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.