Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Netgate 6100 Appliance

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Official NetgateĀ® Hardware
    16 Posts 4 Posters 1.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B
      blaytrail
      last edited by

      Team,

      I currently have an SG-1100. I just turned on ntopng, which is awesome. I'm looking at turning on Suricata and other addons in pfSense. I need to get a better appliance. I'm currently looking at the 6100. Can I get 16GB of ram instead of 8?

      I want to ensure I have enough horsepower to turn on all options. I have a test lab with about 30 endpoints.

      Thanks.

      R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • R
        rcoleman-netgate Netgate @blaytrail
        last edited by

        @blaytrail The RAM is not upgradable on the 6100.
        There should be plenty of horsepower, but if you're running Suricata and other things that have a lot of logging get the MAX, not the BASE, or you'll likely burn out your eMMC storage shortly between 10-18 months after purchase.

        Ryan
        Repeat, after me: MESH IS THE DEVIL! MESH IS THE DEVIL!
        Requesting firmware for your Netgate device? https://go.netgate.com
        Switching: Mikrotik, Netgear, Extreme
        Wireless: Aruba, Ubiquiti

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B
          blaytrail
          last edited by

          Should I upgrade to the 128GB M.2 NVMe shortage?

          R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R
            rcoleman-netgate Netgate @blaytrail
            last edited by

            @blaytrail That is the MAX option, yes. Or you can use the BASE and limit your logging to RAM Disks, but that will take away from the 8GB you already have on the system.

            Ryan
            Repeat, after me: MESH IS THE DEVIL! MESH IS THE DEVIL!
            Requesting firmware for your Netgate device? https://go.netgate.com
            Switching: Mikrotik, Netgear, Extreme
            Wireless: Aruba, Ubiquiti

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B
              blaytrail
              last edited by

              I will limit my logging.

              My goal is to clear the logs every 24 hours to this being a test lab. Do think that will work?

              R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • R
                rcoleman-netgate Netgate @blaytrail
                last edited by

                @blaytrail The writes to the logs are the things that kill it, not the amount of time the logs stay on the system. Please peruse around the forum here to find out how to disable or offload the logging for those services. They can be found in the channels specifically for those services.

                Ryan
                Repeat, after me: MESH IS THE DEVIL! MESH IS THE DEVIL!
                Requesting firmware for your Netgate device? https://go.netgate.com
                Switching: Mikrotik, Netgear, Extreme
                Wireless: Aruba, Ubiquiti

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  blaytrail
                  last edited by

                  Thanks.

                  That makes sense.
                  The goal is to write the logs to a different storage device that can handle the volume. I did not know this was an option using the Netgate device. I will look through the forums to get the information.

                  The good news is that if the logs are being written to other devices, the Netgate device just needs enough horsepower to process the events and send the logs to the storage device. Is that correct?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    That's correct. I would still choose to get the SSD if you're planning to run a number of packages though.

                    Steve

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • B
                      blaytrail
                      last edited by

                      Totally agree, everything I run in my lab is SSD. :)

                      Thanks again for your time.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • B
                        bcdouglas
                        last edited by

                        Ok. I realize I may open up to a few grumpy replies on this, but is the 6100 in a good state? Should there be a 6150 or 6200 to change (improve?) some things? I would like to see the following:

                        1. Allow RJ45 Copper SFP Transceiver Modules on all SPF/SPF+ ports.

                        2. Allow 1/2.5/10G on all SPF ports.

                        3. The 6100 MAX should not only bump up the drive but also bump up the RAM to 16GB. (Potentially for greater ram drive utilization)

                        4. Improved cooling?

                        5. CPU update with one featuring a lower Leff...the Denverton CPU was released in 2017. Yes, I understand the power vs. cost relationship. Maybe something from the Parker Ridge (10nm) family released in June '22. But, I get it..."If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

                        6. I would support ditching the 4x combo ports in favor of 2x very flexible SPF/SPF+ ports...this would free up some physical space on the back of the unit. Sure, ship a certified (but cheap) 1G RJ45 Transceiver Modules for the WAN to help get people up and running without the need to use one of the "LAN labeled" ports.

                        7. A new silk screening scheme on the back that is less WAN/LAN specific.

                        Other ideas?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          Nothing wrong with those suggestions but what you're describing is a completely new product really. šŸ˜‰
                          I would argue that the cooling on the 6100 is pretty good given that it's fanless which is a huge point for a lot of users.
                          I would also argue that 16GB of RAM is unnecessary for the vast majority of users.

                          The limitations of the ix ports stem from the SoC so swapping that out probably gets you past those anyway.

                          We are always looking at new devices but global supply chains being what they are currently the options are limited.

                          Steve

                          B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • B
                            bcdouglas @stephenw10
                            last edited by

                            @stephenw10 Cool. Thanks for listening and replying!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • B
                              blaytrail
                              last edited by

                              Thanks everyone for the information. Is it worth just building a PC with pfsense community edition?

                              Does pfsense+ give you more option than pfsense community?

                              Also, can you using pfsense+ on a non-Netgate appliance?

                              R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • B
                                bcdouglas
                                last edited by bcdouglas

                                If you just want to kick the pfsense tires, you could run it in a vm. Neetgste does offer free home/lab pfsense+ licenses. Those should work for either a vm or physical hardware. Note: The license is one-time activation, but requesting additional ones seems to be ok.

                                R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • R
                                  rcoleman-netgate Netgate @bcdouglas
                                  last edited by

                                  @bcdouglas Also the license is non-transferable so crushing a VM and replacing the VM with a new one will result in needing a new license.

                                  If you have a VM configured how you want it, then request your license... mothball and resurrect the VM as needed in the future. Static MACs will help this system not get a new NDI in future restarts as well (the NDI change will drop your pfSense Plus license as well).

                                  Ryan
                                  Repeat, after me: MESH IS THE DEVIL! MESH IS THE DEVIL!
                                  Requesting firmware for your Netgate device? https://go.netgate.com
                                  Switching: Mikrotik, Netgear, Extreme
                                  Wireless: Aruba, Ubiquiti

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • R
                                    rcoleman-netgate Netgate @blaytrail
                                    last edited by

                                    @blaytrail said in Netgate 6100 Appliance:

                                    Also, can you using pfsense+ on a non-Netgate appliance?

                                    Yes: https://www.netgate.com/blog/migrate-from-pfsense-ce-software-to-netgate-pfsense-plus-software

                                    Ryan
                                    Repeat, after me: MESH IS THE DEVIL! MESH IS THE DEVIL!
                                    Requesting firmware for your Netgate device? https://go.netgate.com
                                    Switching: Mikrotik, Netgear, Extreme
                                    Wireless: Aruba, Ubiquiti

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.