Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Using a GRE Tunnel to route VMs network and IP to external network.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    36 Posts 2 Posters 5.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • XuapX
      Xuap @Xuap
      last edited by

      Also, traceroutes only give * * * * back:

      27620e86-8dd4-4046-bfaa-bb66713b3f4d-image.png

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @Xuap
        last edited by

        @xuap said in Using a GRE Tunnel to route VMs network and IP to external network.:

        But is it normal the ping state is 0:0 on both ends?

        Yes. icmpv4 doesn't have a state.

        You should still have 1:1 NAT rules on the remote pfSense. With that you wouldn't need the outbound NAT rule, the 1:1 does that already.
        And you need the 1:1 rule if you want inbound connections the VM to work. Or add port forwards for each connection you need but 1:1 does it all.

        Steve

        XuapX 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • XuapX
          Xuap @stephenw10
          last edited by

          @stephenw10 So, I can remove the NAT Rules and set NAT as automatic because 1:1 Mapping does all those rules already?

          Also, I want to use inbound connections too, for that, I do need that rule mentioned above, or what should I do?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Yes, if you have the 1:1 NAT rule in place it NAT's all traffic inbound and outbound between those IPs, 1:1.
            So you can remove/disable the outbound NAT rule. No harm in leaving it in hybrid mode though.

            For inbound traffic you still need firewall rules to allow that on the remote side WAN. And they re applied after NAT so the destination will be the internal private IPs of the VMs.

            XuapX 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • XuapX
              Xuap @stephenw10
              last edited by

              @stephenw10 I putted NAT in auto mode
              b0647163-4fde-462a-90da-995f9ebce5e5-image.png
              and in the WAN rules I have this
              c9dc6e49-f282-4b31-ab0c-2a8f703dc952-image.png

              you were referring to those rules I just created right?

              I can ping any IP address, but I can't ping any URL
              20acf6c1-66b6-405a-bdf7-d8a834301eb0-image.png

              I have the nameservers 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 on the VM

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                It looks like you have something that's only passing ICMP then.

                Look for any state to 8.8.8.8 when you try to ping by FQDN. You should see the DNS traffic from the VM opening states on all 4 interfaces.

                Steve

                XuapX 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • XuapX
                  Xuap @stephenw10
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10 On local I get this one

                  93d1808d-db92-4c6d-bafe-dfc4342609e0-image.png

                  On remote I get nothing
                  efe8bbfe-5878-4685-a700-9fe7ce16faef-image.png

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    What firewall rules do you have on the remote GRE interface?

                    XuapX 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • XuapX
                      Xuap @stephenw10
                      last edited by

                      @stephenw10

                      This ones
                      0012b175-aee1-47a9-8e43-047862e4b8a3-image.png

                      XuapX 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • XuapX
                        Xuap @Xuap
                        last edited by

                        @xuap It is now solved, it was the Firewall that had an option to block IPV6, and some rules were not properly configured. Thanks for all the help Steve! :D

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          Cool. Yeah you'd need a rule to pass traffic from 192.168.2.X to any on that interface. Not just v4 ICMP as shown in that screenshot.

                          Steve

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.