Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Throughput problems on 4100

    Official Netgate® Hardware
    7
    28
    3.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • bingo600B
      bingo600 @ahxcjay
      last edited by

      @ahxcjay said in Why is the 4100 performance such trash?:

      O M G

      IT FIXED IT !

      bcddd7ba-1be3-4fb9-93b9-a8a37e2470f6-image.png

      ..this is a bug, right?

      I have read this two times now ....
      What fixed it ????

      Factory reset or ????

      If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a 👍 - "thumbs up"

      pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

      QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
      CPU  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
      LAN  : 4 x Intel 211, Disk  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

      GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • GertjanG
        Gertjan @bingo600
        last edited by

        @bingo600 said in Why is the 4100 performance such trash?:

        I have read this two times now ....
        What fixed it ????

        Me 3 times.
        And I have a 4100 in front of my.
        I've 4 igc0-1-2-3 interfaces, an ix2 and an ix3. The latter two are combo ports :
        See here.

        I presume the fix was : use WAN on igc0 and all the LANs on igc1, 2 and 3 - not using ix2 and ix3.

        No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
        Edit : and where are the logs ??

        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          Yeah, I read that as using igc as WAN fixed it. In which case it's probably linking differently than ix to whatever is upstream. Potentially with or without flow-control.
          You'd have to check the ifconfig output from each to know more.

          Steve

          A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • A
            ahxcjay @stephenw10
            last edited by

            @stephenw10 igc as WAN fixed it. What would cause this behaviour..?

            stephenw10S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A
              ahxcjay @Gertjan
              last edited by

              @gertjan correct. Once I removed ix from the ports used my line is at full speed on all uploads again! Amazing.

              Thank you everyone!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @ahxcjay
                last edited by

                @ahxcjay said in Throughput problems on 4100:

                What would cause this behaviour..?

                I would think it must be something in the link negotiation there. I would check the ifconfig -vv output for each NIC to start with. It 'feels' like a flow control issue. You would see 'rxpause, txpause' in that output. It can be disabled (or enabled) on ix if it is that.

                Steve

                A GertjanG 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • A
                  ahxcjay @stephenw10
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10 great info. Thank you! I am so happy this is fixed as I love the product.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • GertjanG
                    Gertjan @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10 said in Throughput problems on 4100:

                    I would think it must be something in the link negotiation there. I would check the ifconfig -vv output for each NIC to start with. It 'feels' like a flow control issue. You would see 'rxpause, txpause' in that output. It can be disabled (or enabled) on ix if it is that.

                    For the one and only 'ix' I use as a WAN to my 1Gbits/sec ISP router, I see :

                    ix3: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
                            description: WAN
                            options=e138bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_UCAST,WOL_MCAST,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWFILTER,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
                            ether 90:ec:77:xx:39:2a
                            inet6 fe80::92ec:77ff:fe29:392a%ix3 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8
                            inet 192.168.10.5 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.10.255
                            media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex,rxpause,txpause>)
                            status: active
                            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
                    

                    In short :

                    media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex,rxpause,txpause>)
                    

                    for the port that is in use.

                    This is normal / not normal ?
                    Btw : I don't mind for now, as I have 23 Mbits/sec down and 2 Mbits/sec up for now.
                    Gbit fibre is coming at the end of the month.

                    No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                    Edit : and where are the logs ??

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A
                      ahxcjay @keyser
                      last edited by ahxcjay

                      @keyser said in Throughput problems on 4100:

                      We alle want to help, but it’s not very motivating when posts like yours just flame the product

                      Fair point, and I apologise. I was just so frustrated that I really really like the product, yet the upload speeds were killing my enjoyment of it. I asked the mods to change $subject to something more appropriate.

                      The problem is that google searches from people also finds this post, and some people only read headlines….

                      Understand, and that was in my thinking also, hence the request to change the $subject.

                      keyserK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
                      • keyserK
                        keyser Rebel Alliance @ahxcjay
                        last edited by

                        @ahxcjay said in Throughput problems on 4100:

                        @keyser said in Throughput problems on 4100:

                        We alle want to help, but it’s not very motivating when posts like yours just flame the product

                        Fair point, and I apologise. I was just so frustrated that I really really like the produt, yet the upload speeds were killing my enjoyment of it. I asked the mods to change $subject to something more appropriate.

                        The problem is that google searches from people also finds this post, and some people only read headlines….

                        Understand, and that was in my thinking also, hence the request to change the $subject.

                        This post on the other hand, just earns the full respect of all of us🙏

                        We can all make mistakes, especially when frustrated - but it takes a real man to own up to it, acknowledge a mistake was made and apologise.
                        If only all people showed this kind of respect instead of fleeing the “crime scene”, the Internet would be SO much a better place.

                        Thank you for responding and kudos to you👍

                        Love the no fuss of using the official appliances :-)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                        • S selfjc referenced this topic on
                        • S selfjc referenced this topic on
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.