Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    T-Mobile Monitor IP

    Routing and Multi WAN
    5
    16
    1.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      skull07
      last edited by

      Hello All,
      I use a Netgate 4100 with pFsense and T-Mobile home internet as the secondary ISP in a failover configuration. I was using 1.1.1.1 as the monitor IP for failover, but all of a sudden, it stopped working and would not go to online status. I think it had to do with CGNAT, as once I removed the Monitor IP, it was back online. Does anyone using this configuration know of a host IP address that would work with T-Mobile as a monitor IP

      R G 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • R
        rcoleman-netgate Netgate @skull07
        last edited by

        @skull07 It's possible that your IP address has been blocked by 1.1.1.1. Did you try a different IP to monitor?

        Ryan
        Repeat, after me: MESH IS THE DEVIL! MESH IS THE DEVIL!
        Requesting firmware for your Netgate device? https://go.netgate.com
        Switching: Mikrotik, Netgear, Extreme
        Wireless: Aruba, Ubiquiti

        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          skull07 @rcoleman-netgate
          last edited by

          @rcoleman-netgate Yes I tried several. Even though I am back online with no Monitor IP I just tried a ping through that interface and it failed with 100% packet loss. I have Starlink as the default ISP on WAN1 and that returns pings just fine.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • demD
            dem
            last edited by

            I've seen reports of T-Mobile Home Internet starting to drop pings on Reddit and on the T-Mobile Community. This is really going to be a pain if it's deliberate. At the moment pings are still working for me.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T
              tcw
              last edited by tcw

              I can confirm my ping stopped working through T-Mobile as well, just noticed today. The T-Mobile community thread descriptions are comparable to my experience (packet loss of 94%). For now I have gateway monitoring disabled since it is my failover WAN.

              Is there an alternative technique we can use for gateway monitoring in pfSense? TCP request, DNS, anything?

              R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • R
                rcoleman-netgate Netgate @tcw
                last edited by

                @tcw what IP were you using?

                Ryan
                Repeat, after me: MESH IS THE DEVIL! MESH IS THE DEVIL!
                Requesting firmware for your Netgate device? https://go.netgate.com
                Switching: Mikrotik, Netgear, Extreme
                Wireless: Aruba, Ubiquiti

                T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T
                  tcw @rcoleman-netgate
                  last edited by

                  @rcoleman-netgate Thanks for replying. I generally have my primary and failover IPv4 monitor IPs set to a couple of servers in Cloudflare's AS (104.x.0.1 and 104.x.1.1 respectively) that consistently respond to pings. After searching I tried a handful of Hurricane Electric tunnel addresses, and as a last act of desperation tried 8.8.8.8 (my DNS server is not Google) before searching and finding this thread. Same behavior regardless of IP address used... 30-50 ms pings through my primary gateway, and about 19/20 pings timeout once it's used as the failover monitor IP for T-Mobile.

                  R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • R
                    rcoleman-netgate Netgate @tcw
                    last edited by

                    @tcw Interesting. I wasn't aware.

                    You can turn off the monitoring ACTION but maintain the monitor without any impact on your system

                    Ryan
                    Repeat, after me: MESH IS THE DEVIL! MESH IS THE DEVIL!
                    Requesting firmware for your Netgate device? https://go.netgate.com
                    Switching: Mikrotik, Netgear, Extreme
                    Wireless: Aruba, Ubiquiti

                    T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • T
                      tcw @rcoleman-netgate
                      last edited by tcw

                      @rcoleman-netgate One poster on the T-Mobile community site indicated that Microsoft Teams determines host connectivity by pinging teams.microsoft.com, and people trying to use Teams recently on fixed wireless had all kinds of issues/disconnections. I don't think I'm brave enough to try this during a real work meeting, yet.

                      I realize there are separate options to disable monitoring and monitoring action, but in this case since the monitor is reporting erroneous information, would it just make more sense to disable monitoring on the secondary WAN altogether? Fortunately the monitoring works on the primary IP and the gateway fails over and back properly (at least with manually unplugging the primary WAN cable to test).

                      And I'm sure this is entirely a coincidence, but community.t-mobile.com is now throwing sporadic 403s for me.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • T
                        tcw
                        last edited by

                        As of this morning, pings are working and my gateway monitoring shows online (I did disable monitoring action and will leave it that way for the time being). Can anyone else who's had issues with ICMP confirm? Maybe T-Mo got the memo?

                        R S 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • R
                          rcoleman-netgate Netgate @tcw
                          last edited by

                          @tcw CG-NAT is just a mess on its own that I suspect it will fluctuate from one week to another, or even day to day.

                          Ryan
                          Repeat, after me: MESH IS THE DEVIL! MESH IS THE DEVIL!
                          Requesting firmware for your Netgate device? https://go.netgate.com
                          Switching: Mikrotik, Netgear, Extreme
                          Wireless: Aruba, Ubiquiti

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • demD
                            dem
                            last edited by

                            This may or may not be related, but ever since I've had TMHI I've gotten messages like this:

                            Oct 24 17:10:31 router dpinger[26660]: TMHI_DHCP6 2620:fe::9: duplicate echo reply received
                            Oct 24 17:10:32 router dpinger[26660]: TMHI_DHCP6 2620:fe::9: duplicate echo reply received
                            Oct 24 17:10:44 router dpinger[26660]: TMHI_DHCP6 2620:fe::9: duplicate echo reply received
                            Oct 24 17:10:46 router dpinger[26282]: TMHI_DHCP 149.112.112.112: duplicate echo reply received
                            Oct 24 17:11:44 router dpinger[26282]: TMHI_DHCP 149.112.112.112: duplicate echo reply received
                            Oct 24 17:12:40 router dpinger[26282]: TMHI_DHCP 149.112.112.112: duplicate echo reply received
                            

                            So maybe their duplicate ping generator has been acting up. 😁

                            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              skull07 @tcw
                              last edited by

                              @tcw Pings still not working for me. Did you ping within diagnostics or outside the gateway

                              T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S
                                skull07 @dem
                                last edited by

                                @dem Yeah same here

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • T
                                  tcw @skull07
                                  last edited by tcw

                                  @skull07 If I understand everything correctly, assigning a monitor IP to a gateway opens a state, so any subsequent traffic to that IP is routed through that gateway. So yes, I am pinging that IP in a terminal window and getting responses, as well as pfSense pinging that same IP from the firewall itself to measure packet loss for gateway monitoring (same mechanics as from Diagnostics/Ping).

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • G
                                    gff1stof3 @skull07
                                    last edited by

                                    @skull07 I am also having this issue with T-Mobile home internet. I get the "duplicate echo reply received" alerts in dpinger but there are no duplicates happening at least not in the packet trace of the WAN interface, I am using an ATT connection as my backup WAN. I seem to get phantom packet loss indications as well randomly where there really are no packets lost. I tried using unique singular public IP's that are not accessed by my systems and the problem still happens. It's something to do with the T-Mobile router and/or CGNAT which does not allow you to use passthrough mode or any options at all for that matter. It also blocks traceroute attempts to get an idea of intermediate gateways. Of course using this router makes for a double and maybe triple NAT scenario but I have no other way to get internet where I live and for most things it works fantastic. Just cant use dpinger anymore to get an idea of the link quality. If anyone does ever figure out what's going on here please post.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.