Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    IPv6 Question

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    64 Posts 3 Posters 10.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • johnpozJ
      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @stephenw10
      last edited by

      @stephenw10 said in IPv6 Question:

      This is a curious situation you have discovered!

      For sure... there has to be a piece of the puzzle we are missing. Since it makes zero sense that untagged traffic coming into 3/20 on his switch could somehow make it to pfsense tagged vlan 11. When clearly on his port connected to ix0 on pfsense also shows untagged as 1..

      From his 2 switch port configs, the untagged or native vlan is clearly shown as vlan 1

      Is there any other ports connected to this server.. That could somehow put untagged traffic on vlan 11 on the switch?

      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

      J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        johnnybinator @johnpoz
        last edited by

        @johnpoz Not that I'm aware of.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          It's the fact you have two way traffic that is most confusing. It's relatively common to see something incorrectly stripping tags. Some misbehaving switch or hardware offloading on a NIC for example. But that would only ever expose an untagged host to traffic that should be on a VLAN. It would not re-tag it the other way.
          You could try running packet captures on the interfaces in question to see if that traffic is in fact tagged or untagged as expected.

          Steve

          J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            johnnybinator @stephenw10
            last edited by

            @stephenw10 I will do some testing later. I cannot do it now.

            J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              johnnybinator @johnnybinator
              last edited by

              @johnnybinator Actually I was able to spin up a VM & everything now works as intended. I appreciate you sticking with me and helping to eliminate possibilities.

              johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • johnpozJ
                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @johnnybinator
                last edited by

                @johnnybinator said in IPv6 Question:

                I was able to spin up a VM & everything now works as intended

                huh.. Dude you can not leave us hanging like that ;) There has to be a actual reason, so before the vm was tagging the traffic that you didn't think it should be tagging?

                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  johnnybinator @johnpoz
                  last edited by

                  @johnpoz I guess I could put the switch back the way it was and see if that makes things go back to what was happening. This is at him and I'm working. Kind of a hectic week. When originally posted this, I thought someone was going to just say "yeah, just click here, etc..."

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    The change you made though was to remove the IPv6 IP from the switch?

                    J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      johnnybinator @stephenw10
                      last edited by

                      @stephenw10 The change was ipv6 addres on vlan 11, which is where the switch's IPv4 is, instead of VLAN 1 which is where the IPv6 address assignment went when I put it in via the GUI, which doesn't give you a choice of interface.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        So assigning it in the switch sing the CLI you were able to put it on VLAN11 and everything started working as expected? That's some interesting behaviour.

                        J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • J
                          johnnybinator @stephenw10
                          last edited by

                          @stephenw10 Yes, exactly. These are not the highest-end switches I've ever worked with. I went for silence, remember?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • stephenw10S
                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                            last edited by

                            Mmm, fun*. I'll have to watch out for that.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.