REGEX blocking

[Gertjan]

@cool_corona

and then :

and then the list get available :

[Cool_Corona]

@gertjan Got it Thanks man!

[Cool_Corona]

@gertjan Sometimes it works...sometime it doesnt.

Kind of annoying....

^ad([sxv]?[0-9]*|system)[_.-]([^.[:space:]]+\.){1,}|[_.-]ad([sxv]?[0-9]*|system)[_.-]
^(.+[_.-])?adse?rv(er?|ice)?s?[0-9]*[_.-]
^(.+[_.-])?telemetry[_.-]
^adim(age|g)s?[0-9]*[_.-]
^adtrack(er|ing)?[0-9]*[_.-]
^advert(s|is(ing|ements?))?[0-9]*[_.-]
^aff(iliat(es?|ion))?[_.-]
^analytics?[_.-]
^banners?[_.-]
^beacons?[0-9]*[_.-]
^count(ers?)?[0-9]*[_.-]
^mads\.
^pixels?[-.]
^stat(s|istics)?[0-9]*[_.-]
# ^(.+[_.-])?(facebook|fb(cdn|sbx)?|tfbnw)\.[^.]+$

Facebook block only works sometimes and it makes DNS horribly slow. (its intentional that I commented it out in the current config).

[Gertjan]

@cool_corona

I'm not sure you can comment it out with a #. I advise you to remove it.
This is regex, not some script ;)

Btw :
See line 1451 in /var/unbound/pfb_unbound.py
as long as there are items on the regex list, the pfb_regex_match(q_name) function is called.
The main advantage of regex is : is 'blindingly' fast (way faster as what PHP could have done, python is far superior). When I activated that rule, my browser instantaneously showed

when I entered www.facebook.com in the URL bar.

The DNSBL Python logs :

Regex blocking is as fast as it can gets, way faster as the parsing needed for all the main DNSBL list, compiled from all your DNBL feeds.

[Gertjan]

WTF ....

I added a 'facebook' regex above so I could collect some DNSBL log lines - see image above.

I also saw :

and, as 'facebook' is in the hostname, all looks fine.

I removed the facebook regex, and reloaded pfBlockerng.

Still, Whatsapp didn't work (on my phone).
And wtf, when I deactivated wifi on my phone, still Whatsapp "doesn't work".

Facebook did it again : they have managed to shut themselves, whatsapp this time, out of the Internet. Probably on a planetary level

[Cool_Corona]

@gertjan Thats exactly my issue.... that other apps are affected because they are all mining on each others data og dns records.

Kind of annoying...

[Cool_Corona]

@gertjan https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/whatsapp-down-not-working-status-b2209835.html?utm_content=Echobox&utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=Main&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1666682232

[Gertjan]

@cool_corona Twitter ?
Also on CNN, MSNBC, Foxnews, BBC, all major (local) french tv news, and soon many Youtube "facebook did it again" videos.

[jc1976]

@gertjan so i guess a really slick feature to pfblockerng-devel would be the ability to add regex lists from pihole, like how suricata can use snort lists.

[pfsjap]

At the bottom of Python Regex List section reads "Changes to this option will require a Force Update to take effect" but actually Reload is required.

[Forumis]

This post is deleted!

[Antibiotic]

@Uglybrian Is it still working?

[Antibiotic]

@Gertjan Hello, are you still using regex blocking in pfblockerng?

[Uglybrian]

Yes Antibotic, its still working and I am still using the same list. so far so good.

[Gertjan]

@Antibiotic

yes :

It's pretty powerful.
Be aware : regex !

Read it like this : if any of the text in the lines (the requested host name) matches the regex list, the request gets blocked.

[Antibiotic]

@Gertjan Can you please post your regex in text format? I will copy

[Gertjan]

@Antibiotic

^(.+[_.-])?adse?rv(er?|ice)?s?[0-9]*[_.-] #test RGX1
^(.+[_.-])?telemetry[_.-] #test RGX2
^adim(age|g)s?[0-9]*[_.-] #test RGX4
^adtrack(er|ing)?[0-9]*[_.-] #test RGX5
^advert(s|is(ing|ements?))?[0-9]*[_.-] #test RGX6
^aff(iliat(es?|ion))?[_.-] #test RGX7
^analytics?[_.-] #test RGX8
^banners?[_.-] #test RGX9
^beacons?[0-9]*[_.-] #test RGX10
^count(ers?)?[0-9]*[_.-] #test RGX11
^pixels?[-.] #test RGX12
^stat(s|istics)?[0-9]*[_.-] #test RGX13
^stat(s|istics)?[0-9]*[_.-] #test RGX14

[Antibiotic]

@Gertjan Thank you

[Gertjan]

@Antibiotic

Keep an eye on it :

[Antibiotic]

@Gertjan Are you block for incoming?
What the reason, firewall block itself all in?