Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    6100 with 22.05 blocking IGMP

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Official Netgate® Hardware
    15 Posts 4 Posters 1.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • N
      NOCling
      last edited by

      Default Rule and default logging is all.
      You can use a Rule to block this and disable logging.

      Netgate 6100 & Netgate 2100

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        Except that isn't the default IPv4 block rule. And what is shown would not be blocked by the referenced IPv6 rule.

        Check the current ruleset in /tmp/rules.debug. Make sure it shows that rule identifier against that rule. As I said the most likely thing is that the ruleset was updated since the logs was made.
        Is it still showing that rule against current multicast blocks?

        Steve

        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          mrsunfire @stephenw10
          last edited by

          @stephenw10 Did a workaround by deleting the DMZ interface and added a block rule (not logging) on all the other interfaces.

          rules.debug is showing this for that action:

          antispoof log for $4_LAN ridentifier 1000002520
          

          4_LAN is the parent interface for the VLAN's.

          Netgate 6100 MAX

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Ah, the anti-spoof rule makes more sense there. It's blocking traffic from 4_LAN subnet coming in on a different interface. It looks like the switch is doing something with the multicast traffic it probably shouldn't be doing.

            M bingo600B 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M
              mrsunfire @stephenw10
              last edited by

              @stephenw10 But that must be new. Well I think I have to check Ubiquiti forums. Thanks!

              Netgate 6100 MAX

              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • bingo600B
                bingo600 @stephenw10
                last edited by bingo600

                This post is deleted!
                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  mrsunfire @mrsunfire
                  last edited by

                  Might IGMP spoofing the cause for this? Did disable it and logs are gone.

                  Netgate 6100 MAX

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    Quite possibly, yes.

                    M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • M
                      mrsunfire @stephenw10
                      last edited by mrsunfire

                      @stephenw10 Was thinking about if the reassigning of the interfaces via editing the config file was a problem. Is there a possibility that firewall rules don't match with the interface names? (igb0 / ix1)

                      Netgate 6100 MAX

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        No. The rules reference the internal names in the config (wan, lan, opt1, opt2 etc) so if you reassign opt2 from igb0 to ix1 the rules will follow it.

                        Steve

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.