Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    VPN Ipsec without gateway

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    16 Posts 4 Posters 1.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • V
      viragomann @michmoor
      last edited by

      @michmoor
      As a got it, the respective device with gateway option should be accessed from the remote site. Here is SNAT the way to go.

      If the device should access the remote sites devices you need DNAT and assign virtual IPs for natting to pfSense.

      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @viragomann
        last edited by

        @viragomann maybe I’m confused on the direction of the traffic. So client-a has no gateway and tries to reach out to client-b on remote network?

        Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
        Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
        Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
        Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
        JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

        V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • V
          viragomann @michmoor
          last edited by

          @michmoor said in VPN Ipsec without gateway:

          So client-a has no gateway and tries to reach out to client-b on remote network?

          This case would need DNAT and VIPs of course.

          I was talking about accessing the client from B.

          P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            provablueteam123 @viragomann
            last edited by

            Thanks everyone for the replies.
            This is the network design:Disegno2.jpg
            Thanks

            V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • V
              viragomann @provablueteam123
              last edited by

              @provablueteam123
              And what is the challenge?
              If you've read our recent posts, you should see that the solution depends on if the device in B needs to access an IP at A or if site A needs to access the device at B.

              P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • P
                provablueteam123 @viragomann
                last edited by

                @viragomann
                I have to access from a to b

                M V 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @provablueteam123
                  last edited by

                  @provablueteam123 This is a basic SNAT, no? Not really seeing a challenge here.

                  Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
                  Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                  Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                  Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
                  JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • V
                    viragomann @provablueteam123
                    last edited by

                    @provablueteam123 said in VPN Ipsec without gateway:

                    @viragomann
                    I have to access from a to b

                    So this is how I understood your first post and I described the way to solve it in my first one already. Did you add the suggested outbound NAT rule yet?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P
                      provablueteam123
                      last edited by

                      @viragomann
                      The following configuration must be done on the PFSense a or b?

                      Ensure that the outbound NAT is in hybrid or manual mode.
                      Add a rule:
                      interface: LAN
                      protocol: as you need
                      source: any or even the remote sites network
                      destination: the devices IP they want to access from remote
                      translation: interface address

                      Thanks

                      V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • V
                        viragomann @provablueteam123
                        last edited by

                        @provablueteam123
                        On b, where the client who has no gateway resides.

                        Without this, the device sees the origin source IP in the packets from the a LAN. Since he has no route, he cannot respond.
                        This rule translates the source IP in packets destined to the stated device IP into the LAN IP of pfSense. So the device sees IP which lies within his subnet and send responses back to pfSense, where they are forwarded to the other site.

                        P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          Kind of curious to know what sort of device that is that has no gateway.

                          Maybe it just has the wrong gateway.

                          Outbound NAT (SNAT) will work fine either way though.

                          Steve

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • P
                            provablueteam123 @viragomann
                            last edited by

                            @viragomann
                            I tried it works great
                            Thank you so much

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.