Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Migration from 2100 to 4100

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    33 Posts 3 Posters 3.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • johnpozJ
      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @mgi
      last edited by

      @mgi he did solve it ;)

      "and is actually a better architecture anyway as I get to kick the bridge to the curb"

      he got rid of the bridge hehhehehe

      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

      mgiM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        Are the MAC addresses in that pcap correct?

        Is it using a multicast MAC address?

        That will be blocked by default unless you add the appropriate tunable:
        https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/install/upgrade-before-2.2.html?highlight=mesh#microsoft-load-balancing-open-mesh-traffic

        Though I wouldn't expect that to be bridge specific.

        Steve

        johnpozJ mgiM 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @stephenw10
          last edited by

          @stephenw10 said in Migration from 2100 to 4100:

          Is it using a multicast MAC address?

          I was just coming back to ask the same question ;)

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • mgiM
            mgi @johnpoz
            last edited by

            @johnpoz he applied a workaround that also happens to be a solution for him ;)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • mgiM
              mgi @stephenw10
              last edited by

              @stephenw10 Thanks.

              There are actually no MACs in the pcap. I even ran tcpdump with the -v option.

              I don't want to say Eero's not using multicast for "something", and that it's not causing issues. I want to have a look at this again when I have some time, so I'll also try the workaround.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                Just run the pcap in the gui and download the capture file. It will have the MACs in it.

                mgiM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • mgiM
                  mgi @stephenw10
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10

                  MACs look good, but still no reply.

                  I’ll redo the bridge config from scratch and reboot the box again (hopefully) over the weekend. I only spent a couple of minutes on this today.

                  If that doesn’t help, I’ll put in a small switch :)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • mgiM
                    mgi
                    last edited by

                    No luck even after rebuilding the bridge.

                    It seems that the Eero APs can act really crazy and I would say that's the main issue. I tried to migrate all of them to a wired backhaul and that looped my network 😄

                    Anyway, I like the 4100, so I decided to completely rebuild my wireless/wired network on a different kit.

                    I might test the bridge again at some point, but I really don't have time for this at the moment.

                    Thanks guys for your help and patience.

                    johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • johnpozJ
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @mgi
                      last edited by

                      @mgi said in Migration from 2100 to 4100:

                      migrate all of them to a wired backhaul and that looped my network

                      so you had them all on wired and wireless for backhaul - that for sure could create a loop.. That is not what you showed in your drawing.

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                      mgiM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • mgiM
                        mgi @johnpoz
                        last edited by

                        @johnpoz That drawing is still valid for when I was testing the bridge.

                        I just mentioned (off-topic) that I also tried to migrate the APs to wired backhaul, but that didn’t go well either. I decided to give up on those and redo my network completely (except Netgate).

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.