Cisco vs. pfSense

stephenw10

Next time friends want to pawn off their trash on you - just say no

Ha, I have yet to learn that skill.

orcape

Next time friends want to pawn off their trash on you - just say no.

@stephenw10 said in Cisco vs. pfSense:
Ha, I have yet to learn that skill.

He certainly didn't mean that in a bad way and you don't always have to necessarily assume something bad, especially since there was also an AP as a side dish, which I can use quite well. 'You don't look a gift horse in the mouth.'
Since I don't come from the IT industry and therefore don't have the opportunity to deal with the technology that Cisco builds, it was at least a new experience.
For home use, I would probably not want to use something like this, even as a current new device.
Greetings orcape

johnpoz

@orcape that was a joke ;)

That equipment is so old it has no place in a modern network, its wired is 100 at best, and wifi is N - didn't bother to look up how many streams - can assume SLOW..

Its best use case would be in some village hut where they have a couple of car batteries in the corner for electric that they charge by riding a bicycle..

I could buy a 20$ wifi put openwrt or ddwrt on it and blow away anything that box could do..

They stop selling that device back in 2011.. If not in a villagers hut then it should just be in a landfill somewhere.

stephenw10

I would argue it has value in experiencing a Cisco interface if you've never used one. I have a bunch of old hardware I use only occasionally for testing. It does become less valid over time of course.

johnpoz

@stephenw10 pick up some gig cisco switch and off ebay for 20$ and use that to play with cisco ios..

That would have some use being gig.. I am all for using equipment til its no longer useful - but 10/100 with N for wifi - its junk for any current home network even. Unless you live in some hut in the middle of the jungle or something. And your internet is frame relay speeds hehe

orcape

@johnpoz said in Cisco vs. pfSense:

That would have some use being gig.. I am all for using equipment til its no longer useful - but 10/100 with N for wifi - its junk for any current home network even. Unless you live in some hut in the middle of the jungle or something. And your internet is frame relay speeds hehe

The reason for my post is to hear multiple opinions.
On the one hand it is a fact that the device is no longer up to date, on the other hand the learning effort is too high for me to be able to use it.
It's perfectly clear to me that that would be a technical step backwards and no, I don't live in the jungle here, I'm in the fortunate position of having a VDSL2 connection.

JKnott

@johnpoz

That old gear is fine for learning. I bought mine when I was working on my CCNA. However, I would never put it on the Internet, as it hasn't seen an update in many years. Also, it only has 100 Mb interfaces and I currently get over 900 Mb down from my ISP.

stephenw10

@orcape said in Cisco vs. pfSense:

I'm in the fortunate position of having a VDSL2 connection.

It's all relative. Not that long ago that I got an ADSL2 connection at ~20Mbps and thought that was incredibly fast.

If you have the hardware already and find it interesting or fun to investigate it then why not.

johnpoz

@stephenw10 said in Cisco vs. pfSense:

It's all relative.

agree - if I was living in a hut in the jungle that thing would be a rocketship most likely.. Here living in the modern world, I can find a better faster piece of gear for 20$ on amazon that does AC for wifi and 4 gig ports.. And uses a fraction of the juice.. Throw ddwrt or openwrt on that 20$ box and he would have cool stuff to play with for days and days.. Vs trying to get 15 year old hardware trying to do something actually productive.

orcape

@johnpoz said in Cisco vs. pfSense:

Throw ddwrt or openwrt on that 20$ box and he would have cool stuff to play with for days and days.. Vs trying to get 15 year old hardware trying to do something actually productive.

I know both DD-WRT and OpenWRT very well and I also use them.
But even then, the differences lie in the hardware.
Just as I wouldn't buy a PC with water cooling if I only use it for writing programs and the Internet, I don't have to invest expensive hardware for an AP if I don't use it in a productive environment.
As @stephenw10 said so beautifully.....

@stephenw10 said in Cisco vs. pfSense:

It's all relative.