Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    error loading rules proto ipv6 from any to any

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    19 Posts 5 Posters 1.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      Are you still seeing the same errors in 23.05?

      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A
        ACalcutt @stephenw10
        last edited by

        @stephenw10

        yes they are still happening in 23.05

        7e252d9d-d222-4791-ae0f-5ba2b8f01e1c-image.png

        johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @ACalcutt
          last edited by

          @ACalcutt and what do you show in your port forward rules - a rdr is a port forward. You shouldn't be port forwarding IPv6

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A
            ACalcutt @johnpoz
            last edited by

            @johnpoz

            My WAN1 is a IPv4 only interface.

            Like these port forwarding rules under NAT?

            702f35e6-c83e-4fcc-a264-e8e3240497f8-image.png

            Or the rules for that interface?
            8a94a00b-4ca8-4e32-8d81-25e546b8cb5a-image.png

            S johnpozJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              SteveITS Galactic Empire @ACalcutt
              last edited by

              @ACalcutt from https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/troubleshooting/firewall.html#ruleset-failing-to-load:

              The ruleset can also be verified from the console or Diagnostics > Command in the Shell Execute box by running:

              pfctl -f /tmp/rules.debug

              And/or view the rules.debug file.

              Pre-2.7.2/23.09: Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
              When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to restart, or more depending on packages and device speed.
              Upvote 👍 helpful posts!

              A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • johnpozJ
                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @ACalcutt
                last edited by

                @ACalcutt well seems like something is stuck there - maybe from before doing something would look into what @SteveITS points out and clear up that entry in your rules - because it sure shouldn't be there anyway.

                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A
                  ACalcutt @SteveITS
                  last edited by ACalcutt

                  @SteveITS said in error loading rules proto ipv6 from any to any:

                  https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/troubleshooting/firewall.html#ruleset-failing-to-load

                  In the rules.debug generated I see this line, which I assume is what it is complaining about

                  # TFTP proxy
                  rdr-anchor "tftp-proxy/*"
                  rdr on $WAN1 proto ipv6 from any to any ->
                  

                  I don't recall setting up a tftp proxy... any idea where that is set up? how do I actually get rid of it?

                  johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • johnpozJ
                    johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @ACalcutt
                    last edited by johnpoz

                    @ACalcutt tftp is not the problem..

                    I don't have tftp enabled - that rule is going to be there by defult.. But you shouldn't have that rdr for ipv6

                    Here is that section of mine for example

                    # TFTP proxy
                    rdr-anchor "tftp-proxy/*"
                    # NAT Inbound Redirects
                    rdr on igb1 inet proto tcp from $pfB_AllowPfb_v4 to 209.snipped port 23040 -> 192.168.9.10 port 32400
                    rdr on igb2.4 inet proto { tcp udp } from 192.168.4.0/24 to any port 53 -> 192.168.3.10
                    no nat on igb2.4 inet proto tcp from (igb2.4) to 192.168.4.0/24
                    nat on igb2.4 inet proto tcp from 192.168.4.0/24 to 192.168.3.10 port 53 -> (igb2.4)
                    

                    I snipped out my public IP.

                    I would prob do an export of your rules xml via diagnostics backup and restore.. Do you see that bad entry in there, edit the xml to remove it and then restore the xml.

                    An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                    If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                    Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                    SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                    A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A
                      ACalcutt @johnpoz
                      last edited by

                      @johnpoz

                      Looking through the backup config xml I don't see a rule on wan that is source and destination any. I was looking for a rule on wan that had both

                      <source>
                      	<any></any>
                      </source>
                      <destination>
                      	<any></any>
                      </destination>
                      

                      The closest was the icmp rule that relates to my ipv6 tunnel , but that rule is only ipv4 when i look at it

                      I tried just reloading the config, but no luck there. there error is still happening.

                      johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • johnpozJ
                        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @ACalcutt
                        last edited by

                        @ACalcutt My bad - this is a issue with rdr, so its prob in your nat part of your config.. Download that section and look for the section of the xml that has the bad info.

                        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          You have any NPt rules?

                          A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • A
                            ACalcutt @stephenw10
                            last edited by

                            @stephenw10 , no no NPt rules

                            @johnpoz looking though the nat section I'm not seeing where this rule comes from. Maybe it is an auto generated one? I attached my nat config
                            if someone wanted to give it another set of eyes....I really only have a few entries for PS4/XBOX and some entries for FTP

                            nat-config-pfSense.eiri.lan-20230604135911.xml

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              If it's an auto generated rule I'd check the NAT reflection settings. Either globally or for each forward.

                              However it's unlikely either of those would be v6 or any/any.

                              Where does that rule actually appear in the generated ruleset?

                              J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • J
                                jpmchia @stephenw10
                                last edited by

                                I've encountered / still experiencing the same issue and after 3 clean reinstalls have managed to identify the cause.

                                It's being generated by the: "Enable IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling" option.

                                Unchecking it clears the error but have experienced a number of issues with IPv6 functionality since doing so - we have both direct IPv6 uplinks but also use 6in4 tunnels.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • A
                                  ACalcutt
                                  last edited by

                                  I am also using IPv6 over IPv4 here, so that makes sense.

                                  I ended up moving back to 22.05 and restoring my backup from before that upgrade for now. This error was annoying, but what pushed me was a spent a day trying to get multiwan failover that was working before working in 23.05 and just couldn't get it to actually fail over like it should. worked instantly in 22.05 . maybe after a few more releases I'll give 23.x another shot, but for now I just need this to work as expected.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.