Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    239.255.255.250 Multicast address can it be used with possible WhisperGate and or Malware?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Firewalling
    12 Posts 3 Posters 3.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JonathanLeeJ
      JonathanLee @johnpoz
      last edited by

      @johnpoz But it should be listed as a bogon address for wan side for that subnet and it's not listed I have noticed.

      Screenshot 2023-06-27 at 9.35.56 AM.png
      (physical address not listed as bogon address)

      Screenshot 2023-06-27 at 9.39.06 AM.png
      (multicast subnet not listed as bogon address)

      Make sure to upvote

      johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JonathanLeeJ
        JonathanLee @johnpoz
        last edited by

        @johnpoz said in 239.255.255.250 Multicast address can it be used with possible WhisperGate and or Malware?:

        239.255.255.250

        Ref: ipinfo.io

        Screenshot 2023-06-27 at 9.43.16 AM.png
        (Bogon subnet seems to be missing from pfsense lists)

        Make sure to upvote

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @JonathanLee
          last edited by

          @JonathanLee said in [239.255.255.250

          (multicast subnet not listed as bogon address)

          Sure it is what do you think 224.0.0.0/4 covers?

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          JonathanLeeJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • JonathanLeeJ
            JonathanLee @johnpoz
            last edited by

            @johnpoz thanks, I did not see that before.

            Screenshot_20230627-102149.png

            Make sure to upvote

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • JonathanLeeJ
              JonathanLee @johnpoz
              last edited by JonathanLee

              @johnpoz best practice is to just block the bogons on the LAN WAN side. Does the DNS resolver know not to resolve bogons?

              Correction I was in a parking lot picking up groceries.

              Make sure to upvote

              johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • johnpozJ
                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @JonathanLee
                last edited by johnpoz

                @JonathanLee no you would never block bogon on lan side

                You seemed to have gotten yourself all worked up over a few multicast packers that yeah your going to see on really any network because noise boxes like windows love to scream it out every few seconds

                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                JonathanLeeJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • JonathanLeeJ
                  JonathanLee @johnpoz
                  last edited by

                  @johnpoz thanks for the info

                  Make sure to upvote

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JonathanLeeJ
                    JonathanLee @johnpoz
                    last edited by JonathanLee

                    @johnpoz This is what started to confuse me on my M1 apple I get this when I run a arp -a

                    Screenshot 2023-06-27 at 2.10.00 PM.png

                    192.168.1.31??

                    I have no 192.168.1.31 I assume it's a container on the Apple M1 for the cache that is enabled on it.

                    However when I ping it on the firewall I get replies from the Apple M1 should it be accessible outside of the device itself? You can see the 239.255.255.250 listed when I run the arp -a on the apple. It does not list it in the firewall when I run arp -a.

                    Screenshot 2023-06-27 at 2.12.24 PM.png

                    239.255.255.250 does not have all FF for its mac address however 192.168.1.31 does. I have no VM ware installed on the apple I have removed the virtual box software because it would not run at all it would crash when you tried to run my older VM of xenix that works on other systems.

                    Make sure to upvote

                    M johnpozJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M
                      michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @JonathanLee
                      last edited by

                      @JonathanLee isnt it possible that the M1 has proxy ARP running?

                      Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
                      Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                      Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                      Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
                      JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • johnpozJ
                        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @JonathanLee
                        last edited by johnpoz

                        @JonathanLee its its at all FFs its a broadcast address.. You have mask set at /27 says so right there in your ifconfig.. see the "broadcast 192.168.1.31"

                        If you send a ping to broadcast, then yeah your going to get an answer ;) if there is anything on that network that will answer ping..

                        here when I send a ping to .255 broadcast on a /24 in this case 9.99 answered (one of my switches is on that 9.99 address)

                        $ ping 192.168.9.255
                        
                        Pinging 192.168.9.255 with 32 bytes of data:
                        Reply from 192.168.9.99: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=64
                        Reply from 192.168.9.99: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
                        Reply from 192.168.9.99: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
                        

                        Why would you think a multicast would be all FFs? But look, your going to see multicast on pretty much any network.. Lot of devices/OSes love to squawk on multicast.. I wish I could find a way for plex to freaking shut up for example...

                        ash-4.4# tcpdump host 239.255.255.250
                        tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
                        listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes
                        16:56:51.900218 IP nas.local.lan.51573 > 239.255.255.250.ssdp: UDP, length 101
                        16:57:01.901295 IP nas.local.lan.51573 > 239.255.255.250.ssdp: UDP, length 101
                        16:57:11.901589 IP nas.local.lan.51573 > 239.255.255.250.ssdp: UDP, length 101
                        16:57:21.902645 IP nas.local.lan.51573 > 239.255.255.250.ssdp: UDP, length 101
                        16:57:31.904568 IP nas.local.lan.51573 > 239.255.255.250.ssdp: UDP, length 101
                        

                        I took to blocking it at my switch.. I looked and looked to try and get plex to stop it, but it just wont shut up..

                        acl.jpg

                        If you don't like seeing the in your firewall logs, look to see what is sending it and try and turn it off there - you can really quiet windows down if you turn off some services, and make some reg changes. If it really bothers you get a switch that allows you to block it.. Or you could make some firewall rules to block it and not log it, or allow it if its say mdns and your wanting to discover over vlans with something like avahi...

                        But yeah on pretty much any network your going to see a bunch of it..

                        edit: same with broadcast - see that port block on 8667, my wifi light bulbs send out tons of those!! So I block it at the switch port the AP are connected to, so it won't go to the rest of my network..

                        edit2: look here my other switch at 9.98 chimed in with broadcast ping

                        Pinging 192.168.9.255 with 32 bytes of data:
                        Reply from 192.168.9.99: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
                        Reply from 192.168.9.99: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
                        Reply from 192.168.9.99: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
                        Reply from 192.168.9.98: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
                        Reply from 192.168.9.99: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
                        

                        edit3: here on one of my other networks 2.200 is answering

                        user@NewUC:~$ ping -b 192.168.2.255
                        WARNING: pinging broadcast address
                        PING 192.168.2.255 (192.168.2.255) 56(84) bytes of data.
                        64 bytes from 192.168.2.200: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=331 ms
                        64 bytes from 192.168.2.200: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=240 ms
                        64 bytes from 192.168.2.200: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=160 ms
                        

                        Which is my IPad ;) 192.168.2/24 is one of my wifi networks.

                        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.