Aquantia-atlantic-kmod-0.0.5_2.pkg Error

[yorke]

Aquantia-atlantic-kmod-0.0.5_2.pkg Error

PfSense 2.7.0

Shell Output - pkg add https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:14:amd64/latest/All/aquantia-atlantic-kmod-0.0.5_2.pkg

Fetching aquantia-atlantic-kmod-0.0.5_2.pkg: .... done
Installing aquantia-atlantic-kmod-0.0.5_2...
Newer FreeBSD version for package aquantia-atlantic-kmod:
To ignore this error set IGNORE_OSVERSION=yes

• package: 1400093
• running kernel: 1400085
  Ignore the mismatch and continue? [y/N]:
  Failed to install the following 1 package(s): https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:14:amd64/latest/All/aquantia-atlantic-kmod-0.0.5_2.pkg
  ======================================================================

Shell Output - /sbin/ifconfig | grep media
media: Ethernet autoselect
media: Ethernet autoselect (Unknown <full-duplex>)
media: Ethernet autoselect (Unknown <full-duplex>)
media: Ethernet autoselect (Unknown <full-duplex>)

The intel-ix-kmod seem to fix the issue above,
https://forum.netgate.com/topic/173897/pfsense-22-05-ix-driver-vs-intel-ix-kmod/

https://www.freshports.org/net/intel-ixl-kmod/

[stephenw10]

ix is not aquatia. Nor is it ixl. What NIC do you actually have?

[yorke]

@stephenw10

Was asking should i purchase new intel SFP and if the problem
with the drivers still their in the link provided.
The intel-ix-kmod seem to fix the issue, with the media: Ethernet autoselect (Unknown <full-duplex>)
for intel card. that part was missing. reference also because having same issue with Aquantia.
https://forum.netgate.com/topic/173897/pfsense-22-05-ix-driver-vs-intel-ix-kmod/

https://www.freshports.org/net/intel-ixl-kmod/

I have the Aquantia (AOM-AQS-107-B0C2-CX) that came with the system
and was hoping this would be fix in 2.7.0

Shell Output - /sbin/ifconfig | grep media
media: Ethernet autoselect
media: Ethernet autoselect (Unknown <full-duplex>)
media: Ethernet autoselect (Unknown <full-duplex>)
media: Ethernet autoselect (Unknown <full-duplex>)

https://forum.netgate.com/topic/155264/can-t-assign-nic-aquantia-corp-aqc107/42

[stephenw10]

So you're seeing a link negotiation issue with an Aquantia NIC and are womdering if a fix similar to that in ixgbe could be applied?

What exactly are you seeing?

[yorke]

@stephenw10 said in Aquantia-atlantic-kmod-0.0.5_2.pkg Error:

womdering if a fix similar to that in ixgbe could be applied? yes

What exactly are you seeing?

pciconf -lv
ixl2@pci0:183:0:3:	class=0x020000 rev=0x04 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x37d0 subvendor=0x15d9 subdevice=0x37d0
    vendor     = 'Intel Corporation'
    device     = 'Ethernet Connection X722 for 10GbE SFP+'
    class      = network
    subclass   = ethernet

ifconfig -vv ixl2
ixl2: flags=8863<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
	description: 
	options=48100b8<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,VLAN_HWFILTER,NOMAP>
	ether xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
	hwaddr xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
	inet6 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx%ixl2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8
	inet xxxxxxxxxxx netmask XXXXXXXXXX broadcast xxxxxxxxxx
	media: Ethernet autoselect (Unknown <full-duplex>)
	status: active
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
	plugged: SFP/SFP+/SFP28 10GBASE-T Short Reach (RJ45)
	vendor: AQUANTIA PN: AQS-107-CX-1	

Status Interfaces
Media Unknown <full-duplex>
Plugged SFP/SFP+/SFP28 10GBASE-T Short Reach (RJ45)
Vendor AQUANTIA PN: AQS-107-CX-1

Status Dashboard
Unknown <full-duplex>

[stephenw10]

Ah OK, so it's an Aquantia SFP module in an Intel ixl NIC.

And the problem you're seeing is that it's reporting the link type as 'Unknown'?

What speed is it actually linked at? What does the other end of that link report?

Steve

[yorke]

@stephenw10 said in Aquantia-atlantic-kmod-0.0.5_2.pkg Error:

And the problem you're seeing is that it's reporting the link type as 'Unknown'? Yes

What speed is it actually linked at? What does the other end of that link report? 2.5

[stephenw10]

Ok, not much you can do about that until the ixl driver is updated to recognise multi-gig link rates. That assumes the SFP module is passing that data.

But reporting as unknown shouldn't actually cause a problem passing traffic.