Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Help with 25G Speeds on HA pfSense Routers (LACP) Using Mellanox ConnectX-5 NIC

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    21 Posts 6 Posters 2.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      What config do you have on pfSense for that test? A lot of rules? Basic install?

      K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        kilo40 @stephenw10
        last edited by

        @stephenw10 Pretty much just a basic install with HA and some vlans created. We are in the testing phase so we wanted to have as much of a baseline as possible. On your previous post you asked some good questions that I will try to test later today. Right now I have to do "work" ie email and other admin nonsense.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • K
          kilo40
          last edited by

          Update: I was able to do some more testing and I rechecked the MTU settings for everything and found some things I missed. I then set up to ubuntu vms on each proxmox node. Each proxmox node had the necessary vlans created (I'm using openvswitch) and I was able to get 25gb across the vlans from one ubuntu box to another.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • planedropP
            planedrop
            last edited by

            Interesting, I may want to do some additional testing in my lab on this, I've never managed to push PF much beyond about 10 gig, even with iperf and ideal scenarios, so this is super interesting.

            K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              kilo40 @planedrop
              last edited by

              @planedrop I spent all day at it and just started looking at everything again because it didn't add up. Heres a screen shot of one of the results. ![alt text](iperf3.png I also tried with parallel streams and it worked as expected the retrys went way down.

              planedropP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • planedropP
                planedrop @kilo40
                last edited by

                @kilo40 Interesting, I'll see if I can duplicate this in my lab, that's crazy fast but awesome to see nonetheless.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  That is crazy fast! Are you seeing that both ways?

                  K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • K
                    kilo40 @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10 Yep, tested both ways and everything seems to be working great.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      Nice. Surprising from that CPU. The NICs must really be helping.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • RobbieTTR
                        RobbieTT
                        last edited by RobbieTT

                        Simply stunning performance. I think you will be helping the rest of us from now on! 😎

                        Is this VT-d stretching its legs with the ConnectX? 🤷

                        ☕️

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • stephenw10S stephenw10 referenced this topic on
                        • stephenw10S stephenw10 referenced this topic on
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.