Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    4100/6100 Base or Max

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Official Netgate® Hardware
    81 Posts 10 Posters 15.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      Cabledude @stephenw10
      last edited by Cabledude

      @stephenw10 Hi Steve yes I understand that, however this setup is as basic as can be: AdsBasic DNSBL and PRI1 IP lists. The CPU usage is considerable and the CPU graph goes completely flat after shutting down pfblocker. For this reason I am hesitant to get the 2100 as the CPU is the same as the 1100 CPU.

      I will try to switch to python mode and see if that makes a substantial difference.

      Pete
      Home: SG-2100 + UniFi + Synology. SG-1100 retired
      Parents: SG-1100 + UniFi + Synology
      Testing: SG-1100 w/ 120GB SSD via ext USB (eMMC dead). Works great

      dennypageD GertjanG 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • dennypageD
        dennypage @Cabledude
        last edited by dennypage

        @Cabledude said in 4100/6100 Base or Max:

        this setup is as basic as can be: AdsBasic DNSBL and PRI1 IP lists

        Just for reference, the PRI1 IP list is currently 93,947 entries, and the AdsBasic list is a whopping 202,613 entries.

        FYI, All the Steven Black lists are pretty large... You might want to consider switching from AdsBasic to Ads. The Ads list is only 9,621 entries, but it hits all the high points.

        Edit: EasyList Privacy is another good list at 50,231 entries.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          Obviously it will only be additional load when traffic is passing and opening new states. Or when it has to reload the ruleset or update the lists.

          If it's just idling without any traffic that shouldn't show any significant extra load.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • GertjanG
            Gertjan @Cabledude
            last edited by

            @Cabledude

            To remove the 'pfBlockerng' load :
            af9a21d2-c3bf-45c7-bf29-e0e02f745e22-image.png

            ( A DNSBL example - I don't use any IP list)

            because : most, if not all, of the work of pfBlockerng is : collecting / scanning the log files, and making nice charts, graphs etc.
            But, after some testing and observing, and you're sure it works, why not silence all this stuff ?

            f4e67313-bb2a-4752-8c7b-10cbda6ed746-image.png

            I'm using a 4100 MAX - it's doing 'close to nothing' when I look at the CPU stats :

            6bac958b-91bc-4960-9757-624cc7e82e4f-image.png

            or these stats. Check also the 'DNS stats'.

            No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
            Edit : and where are the logs ??

            C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • C
              Cabledude @Gertjan
              last edited by

              @Gertjan
              Have you ever measured your 4100’s power draw from the wall socket?

              Pete
              Home: SG-2100 + UniFi + Synology. SG-1100 retired
              Parents: SG-1100 + UniFi + Synology
              Testing: SG-1100 w/ 120GB SSD via ext USB (eMMC dead). Works great

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                Cabledude @Gertjan
                last edited by Cabledude

                @Gertjan said in 4100/6100 Base or Max:

                NLLab, the authors of Unbound, said themselves : "use Python mode, that's why we've included it".

                So I switched to Python mode.

                I started with the smaller Ads list but I added the IP PRI1 list and the worst of the GeoIP lists just to see what that would do to CPU:
                45f21a0b-0709-4326-91e9-6a3a0978a96f-image.png

                This is the graph now:
                aeba96fc-2698-46ae-babd-83f8ff677fb9-image.png

                Which is to say there is less CPU activity than when using unbound mode.

                Just to add I started with the EasyList but that feed stubbornly won’t load.

                [Edit: my bad. EasyList running fine now]

                Pete
                Home: SG-2100 + UniFi + Synology. SG-1100 retired
                Parents: SG-1100 + UniFi + Synology
                Testing: SG-1100 w/ 120GB SSD via ext USB (eMMC dead). Works great

                dennypageD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • dennypageD
                  dennypage @Cabledude
                  last edited by

                  @Cabledude You can see the CPU much better if you turn off "processes" (click on the green circle).

                  C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • C
                    Cabledude @dennypage
                    last edited by

                    @dennypage that is pretty neat, never knew about that, thanks!

                    Pete
                    Home: SG-2100 + UniFi + Synology. SG-1100 retired
                    Parents: SG-1100 + UniFi + Synology
                    Testing: SG-1100 w/ 120GB SSD via ext USB (eMMC dead). Works great

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • C
                      Cabledude
                      last edited by Cabledude

                      @Gertjan
                      So here is my CPU graph after switching to python mode, ditching AdsBasic and tweaking the feeds:
                      8ef8ab86-3510-41ef-ba7f-9bee9da808be-image.png

                      Here are my current feeds:
                      a63a9900-f496-44e7-be0f-bdef99e475cb-image.png

                      So my feeds list now consists of the entire PRI1 list, a custom ingress list for my home NAS email server (not in use atm), about 6 GeoIP countries and the EasyList.

                      b899017b-743a-4a56-be6f-2f256c03e7c4-image.png

                      At this point the CPU load is below 5% average which seems very doable, so I'm swinging back to the 2100 which appears to be quite adequate for this load.

                      Pete
                      Home: SG-2100 + UniFi + Synology. SG-1100 retired
                      Parents: SG-1100 + UniFi + Synology
                      Testing: SG-1100 w/ 120GB SSD via ext USB (eMMC dead). Works great

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • RobbieTTR
                        RobbieTT
                        last edited by RobbieTT

                        When you buy a 'base' rather than a Max it is a trivial task to add a suitable SSD. It would take a number of lifetimes to exceed the physical write life of my NVMe.

                        You know, I don't think I ever set Python mode... I will have to check and adjust if required.

                        ☕️

                        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • C
                          Cabledude @JonathanLee
                          last edited by

                          @JonathanLee and to all in this topic:

                          I decided to give the SG-2100 a chance, mostly based on @JonathanLee 's recommendation and personal experience.
                          I went with the SSD model.
                          When I ordered Netgate just released the new SG-2100 with 128GB SSD and my unit in fact came with the larger drive.

                          No issues so far and idling away at < 3% user util. RAM used 14% of 3388GB.

                          My ISP upped the cable internet to 400 down / 50 up (from 200/40). Speed tests don't make the SG-2100 sweat.

                          Power draw 5W steady, peaking to 6W incidentally, on a cheap smart plug in Home Assistant.

                          I have two weeks to evaluate and if I should prefer the 4100 I can return the 2100 under €25 restocking fee. So far no reason to.

                          Thanks,

                          Pete
                          Home: SG-2100 + UniFi + Synology. SG-1100 retired
                          Parents: SG-1100 + UniFi + Synology
                          Testing: SG-1100 w/ 120GB SSD via ext USB (eMMC dead). Works great

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                          • S
                            Stef93 @RobbieTT
                            last edited by

                            @RobbieTT Hello, did you buy the ssd separately? I still couldn’t find a suitable, reliable company. Now I regret that I took it without ssd(. So far I’m only using suricata, I took netgate 6100 base

                            RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • RobbieTTR
                              RobbieTT @Stef93
                              last edited by RobbieTT

                              @Stef93

                              There are lots of SSD options out there (B & M) key, ideally without a DRAM cache. I have Intel Optane in mine - in terms of latency and small read/writes it is way faster than the router could use and has a write-lifetime that will exceed my life remaining!

                              You don't need a large drive, I ran mine with a 16GB Optane (~ £10) for a bit before using a 64GB (~£50) one:

                              alt text

                              The 32GB Optane is probably the sweet-spot for pfSense use with Suricata (~£24) when purchased new. I just use used the drive sizes I had kicking around. For non-optane SSD I would go for a 128GB or 256GB drive to get a reasonable lifetime out of it.

                              ☕️

                              S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • S
                                Stef93 @RobbieTT
                                last edited by

                                @RobbieTT said in 4100/6100 Base or Max:

                                @Stef93

                                There are lots of SSD options out there (B & M) key, ideally without a DRAM cache. I have Intel Optane in mine - in terms of latency and small read/writes it is way faster than the router could use and has a write-lifetime that will exceed my life remaining!

                                You don't need a large drive, I ran mine with a 16GB Optane (~ £10) for a bit before using a 64GB (~£50) one:

                                alt text

                                The 32GB Optane is probably the sweet-spot for pfSense use with Suricata (~£24) when purchased new. I just use used the drive sizes I had kicking around. For non-optane SSD I would go for a 128GB drive to get a reasonable lifetime out of it.

                                ☕️

                                I live in a city where I haven’t found a single ssd pcie key b+m, there is no talk of other parameters. The only available option is yours, MEMPEK1J064GA. I always use suricata actively. ntopng, squid+squidguard, I rarely use it, I may run haproxy in the future.

                                RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • RobbieTTR
                                  RobbieTT @Stef93
                                  last edited by

                                  @Stef93 I cannot remember the last time I used a physical store for HDDs or SSDs. Probably not helped by the fact that my 'city' hasn't been the capital of England for a little over a 1000 years!

                                  ☕️

                                  GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • GertjanG
                                    Gertjan @RobbieTT
                                    last edited by Gertjan

                                    @RobbieTT

                                    Winchester ? ( ! )

                                    No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                                    Edit : and where are the logs ??

                                    RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • RobbieTTR
                                      RobbieTT @Gertjan
                                      last edited by RobbieTT

                                      @Gertjan said in 4100/6100 Base or Max:

                                      @RobbieTT

                                      Winchester ? ( ! )

                                      No, that was about 150 years earlier and Alfred was only the King of Wessex, rather than of England. Not a bad effort from a non-Englishman though. 👍

                                      That said, around that time Britain included a good chunk of modern-day France.

                                      ☕️

                                      C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • C
                                        Cabledude @RobbieTT
                                        last edited by Cabledude

                                        @RobbieTT said in 4100/6100 Base or Max:

                                        @Gertjan said in 4100/6100 Base or Max:

                                        @RobbieTT

                                        Winchester ? ( ! )

                                        No, that was about 150 years earlier and Alfred was only the King of Wessex, rather than of England. Not a bad effort from a non-Englishman though. 👍

                                        That said, around that time Britain included a good chunk of modern-day France.

                                        ☕️

                                        I would have guessed Winchester as well, which as I understand transformed into the capital of the whole of England, under the House of Wessex, some time after Alfred's passing. But if not Winchester, could it be Westminster?

                                        Pete
                                        Home: SG-2100 + UniFi + Synology. SG-1100 retired
                                        Parents: SG-1100 + UniFi + Synology
                                        Testing: SG-1100 w/ 120GB SSD via ext USB (eMMC dead). Works great

                                        RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • RobbieTTR
                                          RobbieTT @Cabledude
                                          last edited by

                                          @Cabledude
                                          Think of the king that actually managed some peace, despite it all being recently glued together. Oh and demonstrated his limitations to his subjects by demonstrating that he could not hold back the tide. Also the one where history rearranged his name to avoid the 'c' word...

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • C
                                            Cabledude @JonathanLee
                                            last edited by Cabledude

                                            @JonathanLee said in 4100/6100 Base or Max:

                                            @Cabledude It is great the only time I see it MAX out on it is on system start up, reboots. Snort rebuilds take up some CPU and ram when that occurs too.

                                            It is impressive to see this processor run with some good code like pfSense.

                                            @JonathanLee I went with the SG-2100. The performance in terms of WAN throughput and routing is adequate but invoking the dashboard can take a lot of seconds:

                                            • 3.5 seconds with "System Information" widget only

                                            • every additional widget makes dash load time increase by about a second

                                            • My usual dashboard widget layout takes 11 seconds to load. This is with SI, Disks, pfBlockerNG, Gateways, Interfaces, Services Status, ZFS and Traffic Graphs.

                                            For comparison: my friend's SG-4100 dashboard takes 2 seconds to load and he has the same widgets that I have.

                                            Is my dashboard load time similar to yours? Could you please either confirm or share your unit's behaviour? I am wondering if I got a melon or if this is normal for this model.
                                            If it is normal I don't consider it to be a huge problem.

                                            Thanks a lot in advance!

                                            Pete
                                            Home: SG-2100 + UniFi + Synology. SG-1100 retired
                                            Parents: SG-1100 + UniFi + Synology
                                            Testing: SG-1100 w/ 120GB SSD via ext USB (eMMC dead). Works great

                                            S JonathanLeeJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.