• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

NTP widget time wrong?

General pfSense Questions
7
20
1.5k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J
    JonathanLee
    last edited by Sep 20, 2023, 6:09 AM

    Did you create a NAT rule for NTP?

    login-to-view

    I have an alias set up for 192.168.1.1 and 127.0.0.1 and anything not going to them "!" negated send to the firewalls IP 192.168.1.1 that will serve the requests. Works great like this. I had issues with manually setting it all the time I set them all to the firewalls IP, as time was jumping all over during tests like my TIME was hacked by 10-15 mins. Weird right, well it was a cyber security class so what do you expect you only learn by trial and error.

    Make sure to upvote

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by Sep 20, 2023, 12:13 PM

      If it's configured only as a PPS source it will remain accurate but not actually sync the time. Though I would expect that only to apply to local source in pfSense itself.
      How is ntp configured in pfSense?

      R 1 Reply Last reply Sep 20, 2023, 2:31 PM Reply Quote 0
      • R
        Ramosel @anthonys
        last edited by Sep 20, 2023, 1:38 PM

        @anthonys said in NTP widget time wrong?:

        Hi @Ramosel,

        It all seems to be working.... but appears to me, it's just the widget that lags

        I believe you are correct. Check the existing discussion Dashboard - NTP widget Server Time

        Thanks Anthonys. I wonder why your thread didn't show in my search?

        I thought I'd messed up the NTP server build and was going through Phil's time refinement process... the more I worked on the GPS-NTP-PPS thing the more the NTP clock drifted (probably not, but it sure felt that way).

        Just odd to me that the widget for a "TIME" server has a dysfunctional clock.

        B 1 Reply Last reply Sep 20, 2023, 2:09 PM Reply Quote 0
        • B
          bingo600 @Ramosel
          last edited by bingo600 Sep 20, 2023, 2:26 PM Sep 20, 2023, 2:09 PM

          @Ramosel said in NTP widget time wrong?:

          Just odd to me that the widget for a "TIME" server has a dysfunctional clock.

          What time server are you using ??
          pfSense is a firewall, not a Time server.
          And my guess is that the NTP server is distributing the correct time, mine does.
          It's just the Widget that doesn't spend CPU-Cycles on autorefresh.

          IMHO - It's kind'a nitpicking.
          I have absolutely no issue, having to hit "Refresh" to update the time. Especially when i have the correct time in the lower left of my PC desktop screen.

          If you need a display with an accurate clock, buy one.

          SNTP sync'ed - pricey
          https://www.american-time.com/product/clock-digital-poe-4-red-6-digit/

          Or use TVB's "Java Clock", since your PC is already in sync.
          http://leapsecond.com/java/gpsclock.htm

          You could even DIY an ESP32 based NTP sync'ed display clock for a decent price.
          http://w8bh.net/NTP_DualClock.pdf
          And sync it to your new Raspi "Stratum 0" Clock.

          /Bingo

          If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a 👍 - "thumbs up"

          pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

          QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
          CPU  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
          LAN  : 4 x Intel 211, Disk  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

          J R 2 Replies Last reply Sep 20, 2023, 2:28 PM Reply Quote 0
          • J
            JonathanLee @bingo600
            last edited by Sep 20, 2023, 2:28 PM

            @bingo600 do you have a NAT for your NTP set???

            Make sure to upvote

            B 1 Reply Last reply Sep 20, 2023, 2:36 PM Reply Quote 0
            • R
              Ramosel @stephenw10
              last edited by Sep 20, 2023, 2:31 PM

              @stephenw10 said in NTP widget time wrong?:

              If it's configured only as a PPS source it will remain accurate but not actually sync the time. Though I would expect that only to apply to local source in pfSense itself.
              How is ntp configured in pfSense?

              Thanks, Steve! Just odd this is normal considering what the "time server" widget is there for. Is this an issue that is even noted for revisit with the pfSense code slingers?

              My NTP is just set with the new GPS/NTP server IP address on the local lan, preferred, server
              Then I have two pools, not preferred, pool
              2.north-america.pool.ntp.org
              2.pfSense.pool.NHP.org
              and lastly, one nist server, as a server
              time-c-b.nist.gov

              That gives me the head count for 3 or more sources.

              Off topic: I'm still waiting on OpenWRT 23.05 release to nail down the "switch issue" with the Marvell chipset. Although the configuration you and I worked out has not shown the problem many others were seeing (I think the complexity of the configuration superseded possibility of mishandling routing on the vlans). But, I think the writing is on the wall for the Marvell based products. And, they'll never support mesh. So I've started playing with the e8450 as apparently Mediatek has hired one of the OpenWRT devs to write their drivers... so I'm figuring that is one of the chipsets that will remain viable and supported in OpenWRT for some time to come.

              N 1 Reply Last reply Sep 20, 2023, 3:30 PM Reply Quote 0
              • B
                bingo600 @JonathanLee
                last edited by Sep 20, 2023, 2:36 PM

                @JonathanLee
                I suppose you mean NAT redirection , to catch "Naugthy clients" that doesn't adhere to the NTP server they get from DHCP

                Nope ...
                All my NTP clients seem to be well behaved.
                I don't log many rogue NTP requests.

                I only allow NTP requests to TFW (pfSense IF's) on all but one Vlan.
                My pfSense & Linux servers are Synced to my two "stratum 0" Boxes , and have a few selected "stratum 1" servers as backup.

                /Bingo

                If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a 👍 - "thumbs up"

                pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                CPU  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                LAN  : 4 x Intel 211, Disk  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                J 1 Reply Last reply Sep 20, 2023, 3:59 PM Reply Quote 0
                • R
                  Ramosel @bingo600
                  last edited by Ramosel Sep 20, 2023, 3:21 PM Sep 20, 2023, 3:05 PM

                  @bingo600 said in NTP widget time wrong?:

                  What time server are you using ??
                  pfSense is a firewall, not a Time server.
                  And my guess is that the NTP server is distributing the correct time, mine does.
                  It's just the Widget that doesn't spend CPU-Cycles on autorefresh.

                  Bingo, now that I understand what the issue is, I agree. But spending the time to build up a GPS based Stratum 1 time server then have the widget lag... was a bit disconcerting. I spent a lot of time trying to fix something that wasn't broke. Unfortunately, when I searched the issue here, I wasn't shown Anthonys' previous thread. Of all the widgets on the dashboard, I somehow had the mistaken idea the NTP widget would be the ONE to have have accurate "TIME".

                  The time server I am using is Raspberry Pi based, uses a GPS hat from Uputronics and after a couple of other builds (that showed the same widget issue in pfSense), I settled on the configuration from Phil Randal (Phil's Occasional Blog). His build is much more involved but really ties down the "time" function of GPS as opposed to location or movement. He also makes it easy to use or not use various GPS sources from config files on the server. The other option is to remove the hat and run u-Blox u-Center software to access and configure the GPS settings of the M8/8 chip via USB-C on the hat itself.

                  login-to-view

                  All of the time needy devices on my network are getting their time from pfSense, I may need to reassess that. But, until now, it has worked for years with offsite sources.

                  Hopefully the devs will look at this and fix it at some point... wasted cpu cycles or not. My little SG-4860 generally runs at about 10% load, so I think I have the available cycles to support a fully functional widget.

                  Until then, maybe an option to NOT show a dysfunctional clock and a disclaimer of it's shortcomings might be a nice stopgap.

                  B 1 Reply Last reply Sep 20, 2023, 3:55 PM Reply Quote 1
                  • N
                    NollipfSense @Ramosel
                    last edited by NollipfSense Sep 20, 2023, 3:39 PM Sep 20, 2023, 3:30 PM

                    @Ramosel said in NTP widget time wrong?:

                    time-c-b.nist.gov

                    Just tried adding that...somehow pfSense is not seeing it as a valid address after clicking save. I take it the "c" is for central time.
                    login-to-view
                    login-to-view

                    Tried the IP and it took that...
                    login-to-view
                    login-to-view

                    pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
                    pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

                    J R 2 Replies Last reply Sep 20, 2023, 3:39 PM Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @NollipfSense
                      last edited by johnpoz Sep 20, 2023, 3:39 PM Sep 20, 2023, 3:39 PM

                      @NollipfSense time-c-g.nist.gov resolves just fine. But you shouldn't be marking things as pools when they are not pools.

                      ;; QUESTION SECTION:                                         
                      ;time-c-g.nist.gov.             IN      A                    
                                                                                   
                      ;; ANSWER SECTION:                                           
                      time-c-g.nist.gov.      3600    IN      A       129.6.15.30  
                      

                      https://tf.nist.gov/tf-cgi/servers.cgi

                      Looks like you have a space on the end there as well..

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                      N 1 Reply Last reply Sep 20, 2023, 3:40 PM Reply Quote 1
                      • N
                        NollipfSense @johnpoz
                        last edited by NollipfSense Sep 20, 2023, 3:45 PM Sep 20, 2023, 3:40 PM

                        @johnpoz Thanks John, I'll fix that.

                        That worked...
                        login-to-view
                        login-to-view

                        pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
                        pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • R
                          Ramosel @NollipfSense
                          last edited by Ramosel Sep 20, 2023, 3:55 PM Sep 20, 2023, 3:54 PM

                          @NollipfSense said in NTP widget time wrong?:

                          @Ramosel said in NTP widget time wrong?:

                          time-c-b.nist.gov

                          Just tried adding that...somehow pfSense is not seeing it as a valid address after clicking save. I take it the "c" is for central time.

                          No, it's just a lesser used IPV4 server in Boulder. Dave MIlls is an old acquaintance and when I spoke with him about my pfSense setup a few years back he said the a-b servers get hammered the most... all the IPV6 guys flock to the d-b and e-b servers... use c-b.

                          https://tf.nist.gov/tf-cgi/servers.cgi

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • B
                            bingo600 @Ramosel
                            last edited by Sep 20, 2023, 3:55 PM

                            @Ramosel
                            That is actually not a bad price for the "Hat" ... €50 from France.

                            Right now i'm doing a DIY NTP server, with an OrangePI One.
                            That will be built in my - RAPCO 1804 L25C GPSDO Receiver
                            login-to-view

                            I have chosen the OrangePi over the RasPi's (I have 10+ 3B's in the drawer), due to the Lan CHIP being connected directly to the SoC.
                            The RasPi 3B Lan chip is actually USB coupled, and that causes a bit of jitter.

                            This is my current "burn in" test of the OrangePi.
                            With a DS3231 IIC Module - https://www.aliexpress.com/item/32822420722.html

                            login-to-view

                            $ sudo i2cdetect -y 1
                                 0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  a  b  c  d  e  f
                            00:                         -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
                            10: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
                            20: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
                            30: 30 -- 32 33 34 35 36 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
                            40: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
                            50: 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e 5f 
                            60: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
                            70: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --                
                            
                            $ sudo hwclock --verbose
                            hwclock from util-linux 2.36.1
                            System Time: 1695225080.007973
                            Trying to open: /dev/rtc0
                            Using the rtc interface to the clock.
                            Last drift adjustment done at 1695223549 seconds after 1969
                            Last calibration done at 1695223549 seconds after 1969
                            Hardware clock is on UTC time
                            Assuming hardware clock is kept in UTC time.
                            Waiting for clock tick...
                            ...got clock tick
                            Time read from Hardware Clock: 2023/09/20 15:51:41
                            Hw clock time : 2023/09/20 15:51:41 = 1695225101 seconds since 1969
                            Time since last adjustment is 1552 seconds
                            Calculated Hardware Clock drift is 0.000000 seconds
                            2023-09-20 17:51:39.554254+02:00
                            
                            

                            The hardware will be "transplanted" into the GPSDO Box , and i will piggyback on the existing Trimble GPS receiver (RX + 1PPS).
                            Then install & run GPSD + NTP w. 1-PPS support

                            /Bingo

                            If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a 👍 - "thumbs up"

                            pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                            QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                            CPU  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                            LAN  : 4 x Intel 211, Disk  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                            R 1 Reply Last reply Sep 20, 2023, 4:06 PM Reply Quote 1
                            • J
                              JonathanLee @bingo600
                              last edited by Sep 20, 2023, 3:59 PM

                              @bingo600 yes, that is what I mean to NAT to your NTP server's IP address for clients not manually going to it. For me I use authenticated NTP so the firewall points to those when requests hit the firewall.

                              Make sure to upvote

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • R
                                Ramosel @bingo600
                                last edited by Sep 20, 2023, 4:06 PM

                                @bingo600 said in NTP widget time wrong?:

                                @Ramosel
                                That is actually not a bad price for the "Hat" ... €50 from France.

                                Right now i'm doing a DIY NTP server, with an OrangePI One.
                                That will be built in my - RAPCO 1804 L25C GPSDO Receiver

                                I like that, sweet. Thanks for the info. Most of these builds are turning off the USB and using GPIO. The i2c gets really simple. Phil gets really deep into fine tuning after you get it running... I need to go back and do more, but I though the Pi NTP server was causing the widget issue. Now that I know it's not, I'll dig deeper into the GPS/NTP/PPS dialog.

                                pi@RPi4b-NTP-GPS:~ $ i2cdetect -y 1
                                0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f
                                00: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
                                10: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
                                20: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
                                30: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
                                40: -- -- 42 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
                                50: -- -- UU -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
                                60: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
                                70: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

                                I'm curious if Phil's build would work on the Orange Pi??
                                http://www.philrandal.co.uk/blog/archives/2019/04/entry_213.html

                                B 1 Reply Last reply Sep 20, 2023, 5:08 PM Reply Quote 0
                                • N
                                  NollipfSense
                                  last edited by Sep 20, 2023, 4:51 PM

                                  Cannot get the devices to agree on time, one will be -0.046s while another device will be +0.045s

                                  login-to-view

                                  login-to-view

                                  pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
                                  pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • B
                                    bingo600 @Ramosel
                                    last edited by bingo600 Sep 20, 2023, 5:12 PM Sep 20, 2023, 5:08 PM

                                    @Ramosel said in NTP widget time wrong?:

                                    I'm curious if Phil's build would work on the Orange Pi??
                                    http://www.philrandal.co.uk/blog/archives/2019/04/entry_213.html

                                    The Trimble TSIP protocol is somewhat special, compared to NMEA.
                                    But i'm in contact with the maintainer of the TSIP part of GPSD, and he's quite sure GPSD will work.
                                    Even with a receive only (Uart RX + 1-PPS) connection. I can't (won't) connect TX to the OrangePI, as that "belongs to the Rapco".

                                    If i go totally crazy i could test for "missing 1-PPS" for ie. 20 sec , and then switch over to a 1-PPS divided down from the 10MHz OCXO in the Rapco.
                                    That way "I'll be somewhat in sync .. Depends on the holdover routine in the Rapco" even with a GPS outage.

                                    Hmmm .... Maybe the HW dependent part should be moved to the "Off Topic thread" you made.
                                    https://forum.netgate.com/topic/182811/raspberry-gps-based-time-server

                                    /Bingo

                                    If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a 👍 - "thumbs up"

                                    pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                                    QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                                    CPU  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                                    LAN  : 4 x Intel 211, Disk  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                                    R 1 Reply Last reply Sep 20, 2023, 5:25 PM Reply Quote 0
                                    • R
                                      Ramosel @bingo600
                                      last edited by Sep 20, 2023, 5:25 PM

                                      @bingo600 said in NTP widget time wrong?:

                                      Hmmm .... Maybe the HW dependent part should be moved to the "Off Topic thread" you made.
                                      https://forum.netgate.com/topic/182811/raspberry-gps-based-time-server

                                      Sure, now that I know I'm not crazy and the NTP clock is really grunged... I'm good here. I doubt that I'd ever build what you have, but you've got me interested and I'd sure like to follow the build. Use my thread or start your own, I'm cool either way.

                                      Rick

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      12 out of 20
                                      • First post
                                        12/20
                                        Last post
                                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.