Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Chinese I226-V on 23.05.1, problems

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    74 Posts 5 Posters 17.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • RobbieTTR
      RobbieTT @stephenw10
      last edited by

      @stephenw10 said in Chinese I226-V on 23.05.1, problems:

      And it comes in stealth black with cool backlighting. ๐Ÿ˜
      i225v_nic-2.jpg

      YMMV!

      Stealth black but more of a Matrix green when it comes to backlighting. It seems to work, which is nuts for an Intel i226-V NIC that cost less than ยฃ9.00.

      IMG_2384 copy.jpeg

      Now to work out how to move my config across - seems more complicated than it needs to be.

      โ˜•๏ธ

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        I think the blue indicates a 1G link on the one I have. Which is i225.

        RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • RobbieTTR
          RobbieTT @stephenw10
          last edited by

          @stephenw10 said in Chinese I226-V on 23.05.1, problems:

          I think the blue indicates a 1G link on the one I have. Which is i225.

          Or the green ones are slightly cheaper as how they make them for so little money is beyond me. It linked at 2.5 Gbps with no hesitation.

          Any tips for copying my config from my 6100 over to the Supermicro Xeon?

          Initially it just looked like a simple job of editing the xml or doing it via the pfSense process to change the interfaces as you go. Now it looks like I need to do a minimum setup for pfSense CE before the process of upgrading that to pfSense+ after praying to a deity (Netgate shop token) before any config work...

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            To import the config just match the interfaces. Should only really be an issue if you have the same interfaces on both. Or if you have loads of VLANs or other sub-interfaces types.

            What problem are you seeing?

            RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • RobbieTTR
              RobbieTT @stephenw10
              last edited by

              @stephenw10

              It seems reluctant to take a pfSense+ config on a CE device.

              If it should work I will have another go tomorrow. Simple setup with 3 interfaces - 1 x WAN, 1 x LAN (inc 1 x VLAN) and 1 x MAN(agement).

              So I will be going from:
              WAN (igc3)
              LAN & VLAN (ix1, 1.1003)
              MAN (igc0)

              to:

              WAN (2.5 GbE NIC)
              LAN & VLAN (SFP28)
              MAN (1 GbE port)... er, yeah, I've forgotten the interface hw names ๐Ÿฅฑ - more tired than I thought!

              If I need to do the pfSense CE to Plus upgrade first I will continue down that path.

              โ˜•๏ธ

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                It would only not work (or complain) if the config versions are different. If you're coming from 23.09 that would be different.
                https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/releases/versions.html

                23.05.(1) and 2.7 shared the same config version though.

                RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • RobbieTTR
                  RobbieTT @stephenw10
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10

                  So rolling-back to 23.05.1 (from 23.09d), taking that config xml and applying it to 2.7.0 CE and then moving on to pfSense+ would be the best path?

                  Glad I asked!

                  โ˜•๏ธ

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    Yes, if you don't have a separate backup of the config from 23.05.1 then rolling back to a BE snap and getting it from there ill avoid any issues.

                    It's a close config version so you may in fact not hit any issues but it will still complain about the version when you try to import it.

                    RobbieTTR 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • RobbieTTR
                      RobbieTT @stephenw10
                      last edited by

                      @stephenw10
                      Thanks Steve, I have suitable snapshots (all hail ZFS) so switching back is no drama. I'll attack it tomorrow - Taskmaster is on the telly. ๐Ÿค“

                      โ˜•๏ธ

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • RobbieTTR
                        RobbieTT @stephenw10
                        last edited by RobbieTT

                        @stephenw10

                        Thanks Steve, all went without a hitch. I did edit the config file with the new interface details before uploading it. Oh and the i226 led is indeed blue down at 1 GbE. ๐Ÿ˜Ž

                        The whole pfSense+ via CE path is all a bit of a confounding time-waster though, especially as this will be for pfSense+ testing alongside my Netgate 6100 (where the plus part is normal).

                        Still, new dashboard with more CPU power:

                        20231013-pfSense+ on Router-7-Dashboard.png

                        Just noticed QAT isn't showing; presumably due to the issue on the bug tracker?

                        โ˜•๏ธ

                        stephenw10S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @RobbieTT
                          last edited by

                          @RobbieTT said in Chinese I226-V on 23.05.1, problems:

                          The whole pfSense+ via CE path is all a bit of a confounding time-waster

                          I understand. We are working on a solution for that. Details to come....

                          RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • RobbieTTR
                            RobbieTT @stephenw10
                            last edited by

                            @stephenw10

                            Brill ๐Ÿ‘

                            โ˜•๏ธ

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.