Share your pfSense stories!

Andrew LB

After many years of owning garbage consumer grade routers that had horrible security, little customization, poor performance, and terrible stability, i began looking at OpenWRT and some other firmwares, then found an article about PFSENSE and it seemed like it would be worth a shot. I tried it initially on a very old Core 2 Quad board with an Intel NIC and after about a week i decided this was the gonna be my new router. So I did a little research and found an incredible deal on a Lenovo Think-Centre M700 Tiny with an i5-6500T and 8gb DDR4 for the low low price of $75 and all i needed to add was a SSD which i already had. I also removed the wifi card and replaced it with a Gigabit LAN adapter so it would have two gigabit ports. I then got it installed and its been great for the past year.

In fact, PFSENSE has been so good with zero crashes and great speed that i kinda just stopped checking in on it until yesterday and noticed there was a big update a while back and i will likely install it tonight later.

What also caught my attention was the uptime. If that isn't a great indicator of stability, i don't know what is.
alt text

JKnott

@Andrew-LB said in Share your pfSense stories!:

What also caught my attention was the uptime. If that isn't a great indicator of stability, i don't know what is.

Once you get away from Windows, that's the norm. PfSense is built on FreeBSD, a Unix type system, just like Linux. Over the decades, there have been many stories about Netware or OS/2 servers that just keep on running. If pfSense fails, it's likely a hardware issue. That's certainly my experience, when the only time it failed for me was because the computer I was running it on died.

nimrod

This guy takes the cake.

JKnott

@nimrod said in Share your pfSense stories!:

This guy takes the cake.

I suspect it's about due for an update.

Several years ago, I heard about a Novell Netware server that nobody could find. It had been walled in and nobody noticed it, because it just kept on working. Windows got us into the expectation computers are supposed to have problems. I used to be an OS/2 product specialist at IBM Canada. I provided 3rd level OS/2 support, as well as some apps on OS/2, Windows 95 and NT. I was also on the team that built standard systems for IBM Canada employees. There were very few problems on OS/2, some on NT and lots on W95. Years before I started at IBM, I was a computer tech, working on Data General Eclipse computers, VAX 11/780s and others. Again, they were very reliable.

Phatsta

@nimrod I have 3 routers getting close... @ version 2.5.1.

MaxK 0

@JKnott said in Share your pfSense stories!:

Data General Eclipse computers, VAX 11/780s and others. Again, they were very reliable.

Ditto, same experience. Unfortunately, technical superiority does not guarantee success. I miss VMS & VAXELN. I'm glad Dave Cutler tried to set MS on the right path with NT - too bad it went sideways for a while.

JKnott

@MaxK-0 said in Share your pfSense stories!:

I miss VMS & VAXELN.

The problem is technology moves on. I recall reading an article that said the new Intel 80386 CPU was as powerful as a VAX 11/780. I then realized I was working in a dying industry. A typical personal computer is far more powerful than those VAX computers were.

provels

@JKnott said in Share your pfSense stories!:

Over the decades, there have been many stories about Netware or OS/2 servers that just keep on running.

For ex: Missing Novell server discovered after four years

pfrickroll

At my 1st IT job, I deployed 40+ pfSense installed on Protectli mini PC. It was my first adventure into firewalling and I was learning on the go along with many network concepts how to configure all of them. They are all around Virginia, Maryland, and Washington DC connected via MPLS over IPSec serving over 400+ employees in the Medical/Insurance field. I left the company over 3 years ago and don't do many firewalls anymore but keep my pfSense on my work desk to test various ideas.

JKnott

@pfrickroll said in Share your pfSense stories!:

connected via MPLS over IPSec

Wouldn't that be IPSec over IP over MPLS? MPLS is layer 2.5 and usually provided by the carrier.

VillageIT

Mine may be typical, maybe not.....
Took over a large sennior living facility with a pretty robust it infrastructure spread between 4 IT rooms, 23 access points, 12-14 switches, and 200 internal devices and 200 guest/resident devices, all being run by a Sonicwall TZ350. I had been wanting to reallign everything network wise for some time but the TZ had 2 ports that were failing. I had worked with ClearOS from back in the ClarkConnect days and started searching for something similar. I found PfSense and it just fit what I wanted to do.
I tested it a bit on an old Athalon64x2 rig for proof of concept and had planned on installing on a mini pc or something, but I wanted 6 nics. Standing in my main IT room I looked down and in the bottom of the rack were 4 HP DL380s, 2 of which were decommissioned 2 years ago. It's such huge overkill for hardware that it's hard to explain, but who wouldn't want redundant power supplies, raid 60 with 25 drives and remote system monitoring through ILO? lol

I spun one up and loaded PfSense and started tweaking. 2 weeks ago I switched over and have been working out gremlins since.. Overall it's gone well, just one snag that a couple members here have been very kind in helping me work out. Thank you to this page for all the help.