Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Setup to allow admin access only from OPT1. Is this correct?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    14 Posts 3 Posters 1.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Yet_learningPFSenseY
      Yet_learningPFSense @stephenw10
      last edited by Yet_learningPFSense

      @stephenw10 Thank you. It seems that what happened before on PfBlockerNG, where the rules were deleted in the GUI but remained applied, was also happening in the interface settings. neither ADMIN_ONLY nor LAN were 192.168.3.1, but after initialization and setting the same rules, I was able to create the desired net connection environment! After initializing and setting the same rules, I was able to create the desired internet connection environment!

      (Correction, I assumed that the 192.168.3.1 address was assigned to either LAN or ADMIN_ONLY and did not investigate the WAN one. (Perhaps if I had selected the WAN tab, it would have come up.)

      I am glad to have solved one of the problems I had been struggling with for many years. Thank you very much for your help.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Yet_learningPFSenseY
        Yet_learningPFSense @stephenw10
        last edited by

        @stephenw10

        Sorry, one last question. I have successfully set up the admin page to be accessible only from ADMIN_ONLY in OPT, but I can't seem to browse the Internet from my laptop connected to the LAN side. I would like to know if there is any misconfiguration.

        I have installed darkstat and ntopng so that I can access it only from ADMIN_ONLY. Hmmm...what is wrong with the settings?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          What do your LAN rules look like now?

          Yet_learningPFSenseY 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • Yet_learningPFSenseY
            Yet_learningPFSense @stephenw10
            last edited by

            @stephenw10

            Thanks! I forgot to post the images I had uploaded to imgur, but when I changed the LAN rules to the ones mentioned by stephenw10, I couldn't communicate, but then I remembered that I hadn't rebooted, so I rebooted and was able to connect to the internet successfully!

            ! PFSense LAN.OPT1 Rule
            it might have added a Reject rule for PrivateNet.

            I still feel that if I ask someone or something, it will be solved in whatever form it takes. Thank you very much. Now I have one more foundation for peace of mind.

            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              SteveITS Galactic Empire @Yet_learningPFSense
              last edited by

              @Yet_learningPFSense FWIW the last rule on LAN (udp/53) will never trigger because the allow to any rule above it will match first. Not a problem, it’s just unnecessary.

              Pre-2.7.2/23.09: Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
              When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to restart, or more depending on packages and device speed.
              Upvote 👍 helpful posts!

              Yet_learningPFSenseY 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • Yet_learningPFSenseY
                Yet_learningPFSense @SteveITS
                last edited by

                @SteveITS

                Thanks, i think so too. I have removed it.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  What's in the PrivateNet alias?

                  Yet_learningPFSenseY 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Yet_learningPFSenseY
                    Yet_learningPFSense @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10

                    https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/solutions/sg-1100/opt-lan.html

                    I am adding these three items from the guide here
                    : 192.168.0.0/16
                    172.16.0.0/12
                    10.0.0.0/8.
                    As a general rule, one PC connection per port, .If possible, I would like to block communication between the LAN and the OPT.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      Ah OK. In that case PrivateNet contains the LAN interface address itself so that rule is blocking access to pfSense for DNS. Clients are probably being passed the LAN address to use for DNS (unless you changed it). The firewall are applied from the top down so you need to move that DNS rule above the 'deny to PrivateNet' rule so clients can resolve.

                      Steve

                      Yet_learningPFSenseY 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • Yet_learningPFSenseY
                        Yet_learningPFSense @stephenw10
                        last edited by

                        @stephenw10 ok, thanks. I will try to set it up that way.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.