Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Would Netgate reconsider reinstating home+lab license but as a subscription model?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    33 Posts 10 Posters 3.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • NollipfSenseN
      NollipfSense @gisuck
      last edited by NollipfSense

      @gisuck said in Would Netgate reconsider reinstating home+lab license but as a subscription model?:

      I don't think the free offering is ever coming back, at least not anytime soon. The best we can hope for is to raise suggestions how home+lab can still be a value proposition to Netgate, without the exorbitant cost of a TAC Pro subscription that is too high for a home use firewall. Let's find a way to lessen the damage, if possible.

      It's probably safe to say that most home/lab firewall enthusiasts were the ones who registered for the plus version and Netgate had their email addresses as registered. Had Netgate communicated just to the group via group email, no one would be caught by surprise and the reaction. I am for lessening the damage and everything in life is negotiable. If Proxmox's home user subscription cost $105...that's a similar open source model for Netgate to emulate and hopefully could implement.

      pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
      pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

      AmodinA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • AmodinA
        Amodin @NollipfSense
        last edited by

        @NollipfSense said in Would Netgate reconsider reinstating home+lab license but as a subscription model?:

        If Proxmox's home user subscription cost $105...that's a similar open source model for Netgate to emulate and hopefully could implement.

        Difference there is it's not mandatory to subscribe to use it, and you lose nothing - no functionality, no update, nothing. Your update repository is different, but it's updated just like the rest of the project. It's really more of a donation avenue, and no pressure if you don't.

        NollipfSenseN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • NollipfSenseN
          NollipfSense @Amodin
          last edited by

          @Amodin said in Would Netgate reconsider reinstating home+lab license but as a subscription model?:

          @NollipfSense said in Would Netgate reconsider reinstating home+lab license but as a subscription model?:

          If Proxmox's home user subscription cost $105...that's a similar open source model for Netgate to emulate and hopefully could implement.

          Difference there is it's not mandatory to subscribe to use it, and you lose nothing - no functionality, no update, nothing. Your update repository is different, but it's updated just like the rest of the project. It's really more of a donation avenue, and no pressure if you don't.

          Yes, I agree, and that's a model it could emulate without the pressure nonsense...

          pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
          pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            SteveITS Galactic Empire @gisuck
            last edited by

            @gisuck new blog post: https://www.netgate.com/blog/netgate-pfsense-plus-tac-lite-available-for-129-per-year

            Pre-2.7.2/23.09: Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
            When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to restart, or more depending on packages and device speed.
            Upvote 👍 helpful posts!

            G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • G
              gisuck @SteveITS
              last edited by

              @SteveITS Yep. Someone already tagged me on this post and I just bought my license now. Waiting on fulfillment then then I don't have to worry for a year.

              I'm happy Netgate went down this path.

              V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • V
                Viper_Rus @gisuck
                last edited by

                @gisuck said in Would Netgate reconsider reinstating home+lab license but as a subscription model?:

                @SteveITS Yep. Someone already tagged me on this post and I just bought my license now. Waiting on fulfillment then then I don't have to worry for a year.

                I'm happy Netgate went down this path.

                I hope you applied the 23% discount ;)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  jsylvia007
                  last edited by

                  So... How about like... a one-time cost? This seems to be OK if you buy their hardware, but not for our own hardware.

                  Literally the ONLY times I've had to reach out to TAC was due to the FUBAR-ing of their own "licensing" after switching to Plus. I'm all for Netgate getting their piece of the pie, but why can't I just pay once... And I KNOW that I can do that if I buy their hardware, but I already have my own hardware. I run Xeon-based hardware in my homelab for experimentation purposes with a TON of interfaces, and none of their hardware (for a reasonable cost) supports this configuration.

                  I don't want the support, I just want continued access to the software. I don't mind paying for the support SHOULD I need it, but, I've been running pfSense now for well over 15 years, and I've NEVER needed the support for my homelab.

                  It's disingenuous for me to have to pay "insurance" for something I never intend to use. I'd much rather pay ONCE, and then be done with it.

                  johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • johnpozJ
                    johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @jsylvia007
                    last edited by

                    @jsylvia007 why do you "need" plus - what is in plus that drives you there.. I have used pfsense pretty much since it came out - only reason I am on + is I have a netgate appliance. And when it dies at some point, I will more than likely just get another appliance..

                    But if I was running my own hardware or as VM (as I did for many years) I would just use the CE..

                    An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                    If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                    Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                    SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                    J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      jsylvia007 @johnpoz
                      last edited by

                      @johnpoz - I ran the 2.6 train of CE forever. Only recently switched when it was apparent that there were critical updates that only Plus was getting (in a timely manner).

                      Except for the update angle, I believe originally ZFS was only for Plus, and now it seems that ZFS is available for CE, but Boot Environments aren't. That's a really nice feature to have in a homelab. So except for reliable updates, and boot environments, not much.

                      I did see mention somewhere that there were enhancements in the network stack that were only coming to Plus, so, those would be (are) nice to have I assume (but honestly don't know if I am/am not taking advantage of them).

                      And honestly, especially with botched notifications like this, my confidence that CE will continue to be supported and updated is severely lacking. This stunt didn't help ANYONE's confidence in Netgate.

                      johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • johnpozJ
                        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @jsylvia007
                        last edited by

                        @jsylvia007 said in Would Netgate reconsider reinstating home+lab license but as a subscription model?:

                        but Boot Environments aren't

                        Ah - yeah that is a big feature, the other that comes to mind is mac filtering - I believe that is only +.. I personally don't have a need/want for the mac filtering but could see that being big reason for going wanting +

                        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                        J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • J
                          jsylvia007 @johnpoz
                          last edited by

                          @johnpoz - Yea... No need for MAC filtering.

                          And to be honest, I just pulled the trigger on 2yrs of TAC-Lite for $200 (use code TACLITE at checkout for 23% off), it is what it is, I suppose. Doesn't make me any happier about the extortion money at all.

                          I'd have gladly given $200 for a one-time cost, but I can definitely say that now, I will be looking at what else is out there when 2 years is up and it's time to renew my "support" contract (which I have no actual intent on using).

                          P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • P
                            Patch @jsylvia007
                            last edited by

                            @jsylvia007 said in Would Netgate reconsider reinstating home+lab license but as a subscription model?:

                            and it's time to renew my "support" contract (which I have no actual intent on using).

                            the support Netgate are providing is timely updates which I suspect you may use and appreciate.

                            J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • J
                              jsylvia007 @Patch
                              last edited by

                              @Patch - Disagree, because purchasing their cheapest hardware option would be a single, one-time payment for the life of the device...

                              P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • P
                                Patch @jsylvia007
                                last edited by

                                @jsylvia007 said in Would Netgate reconsider reinstating home+lab license but as a subscription model?:

                                single, one-time payment for the life of the device...

                                and electronic devices have a useful life of 3-5 years.
                                Home lab may last for 10-30 years with progressive hardware and software updates.

                                Imo a subscription is the appropriate model for a software maintenance service. A once off payment can only cover one version of the software.

                                What is more debatable is what price point in appropriate for each capability (or perhaps application) point.

                                AndyRHA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • AndyRHA
                                  AndyRH @Patch
                                  last edited by

                                  @Patch said in Would Netgate reconsider reinstating home+lab license but as a subscription model?:

                                  and electronic devices have a useful life of 3-5 years.

                                  I disagree, useful life is how long it will do its job. My firewall can easily pass 5 years because my internet connection is unlikely to be increased. I don't really use the 1Gb I have. Support of old HW is another issue, but I find there is a sweet spot for grabbing whole systems full of spare parts.
                                  Apple and others build in the life span so they can sell you another one. A FW should not be the same, I only upgrade/change when there is a need.

                                  o||||o
                                  7100-1u

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.